Deanna

#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1969 · 4,068 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
3 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
134,477
since 1899

Deanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #88, 1969girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,17385—
2024#2,30380—
2023#2,05095—
2022#2,00697—
2021#1,910103—
2020#1,769112—
2019#1,668126—
2018#1,488147—
2017#1,400164—
2016#1,286187—
2015#1,193210—
2014#1,092233—
2013#915279—
2012#917281—
2011#817325—
2010#712396—
2009#604499—
2008#594525—
2007#549557—
2006#529573—
2005#478639—
2004#451674#11,3565
2003#421714—
2002#348855—
2001#353842—
2000#3031,051—
1999#2771,132—
1998#2441,246—
1997#2221,344—
1996#2101,390—
1995#1871,586—
1994#1651,875—
1993#1611,938#6,8167
1992#1551,976—
1991#1581,879—
1990#1591,854#6,4157
1989#1621,757#5,6158
1988#1631,738#5,7517
1987#1701,638#4,5739
1986#1641,664#6,7215
1985#1561,817#6,5235
1984#1511,916—
1983#1491,923#4,4998
1982#1561,894#3,48212
1981#1461,940—
1980#1491,868—
1979#1451,950—
1978#1362,033#3,40011
1977#1382,093—
1976#1282,116—
1975#1262,276#3,9418
1974#1152,558#2,94612
1973#1112,796#3,01311
1972#1073,039#2,81912
1971#953,791#2,12619
1970#904,331#2,62113
1969#884,068#3,3148
1968#1043,414#2,9079
1967#1043,348#3,2317
1966#1053,298#2,62710
1965#1103,406—
1964#1153,575#3,2827
1963#1333,122#2,53911
1962#1383,060#2,50411
1961#1562,683—
1960#1732,295#4,0385
1959#1941,828—
1958#2201,381—
1957#2361,287—
1956#2381,207—
1955#2541,072—
1954#268980—
1953#279886—
1952#284818—
1951#256910—
1950#253891—
1949#240968—
1948#2281,063—
1947#2101,263—
1946#1931,276—
1945#1751,187—
1944#1671,304#3,1096
1943#1601,573—
1942#1601,447—
1941#1371,856#2,8727
1940#1361,802#2,8717
1939#1331,805#3,1136
1938#1152,254#3,1756
1937#1391,624#2,9057
1936#76877—
1935#1,35629—
1934#2,08715—
1933#2,27513—
1932#3,9016—
1931#2,75010—
1930#3,6587—
1929#2,73711—
1928#3,4368—
1927#2,25616—
1926#2,25716—
1925#3,11610—
1924#1,99220—
1923#2,02119—
1922#2,18617—
1921#5,0995—
1920#4,9755—
1919#3,4528—
1918#4,8095—
1917——
1916#4,4175—
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910#1,9357—
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899#1,5965—
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1899

The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Deanna is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,182 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 7,203 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWIMichigan: #712 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,824 girlsMINew York: #873 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,991 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedINOhio: #1,049 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,508 girlsOHPennsylvania: #940 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,761 girlsPANew Jersey: #838 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,572 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,221 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 8,488 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,200 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,428 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDEArizona: #959 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,157 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,096 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,473 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #660 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,976 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedLAMississippi: #483 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,849 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedALGeorgia: #912 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,805 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedHITexas: #2,350 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 20,912 girlsTXFlorida: #1,345 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 9,634 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#483 · 1 in 1,849
  2. South Carolina#660 · 1 in 2,976
  3. Michigan#712 · 1 in 3,824
  4. New Jersey#838 · 1 in 4,572
  5. New York#873 · 1 in 4,991

Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#48361 in 1,849
South Carolina#66061 in 2,976
Michigan#712111 in 3,824
New Jersey#83881 in 4,572
New York#873181 in 4,991
Georgia#912101 in 4,805
Pennsylvania#94091 in 5,761
Arizona#95961 in 5,157
Ohio#1,04981 in 6,508
North Carolina#1,09671 in 6,473
Illinois#1,18281 in 7,203
Virginia#1,20051 in 7,428
California#1,221241 in 8,488
Florida#1,34591 in 9,634
Texas#2,35081 in 20,912
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Deanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
  • 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
  • 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
  • Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
  • Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
Rise & fade · girls
70 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1899
  • Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
  • Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
  • Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
Share of babies · girls
1 in 404
  • Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
  • Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s5#1,596 (1899)#1,596
1900s0——
1910s30#1,935 (1910)#3,777
1920s127#1,992 (1924)#3,008
1930s5,840#115 (1938)#1,718
1940s13,739#136 (1940)#181
1950s11,260#194 (1959)#248
1960s32,269#88 (1969)#123
1970s26,983#90 (1970)#119
1980s18,155#146 (1981)#157
1990s16,220#155 (1992)#194
2000s6,929#303 (2000)#463
2010s2,348#712 (2010)#1,149
2020s572#1,769 (2020)#2,035

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Deanna in 2016

girls
#1,286
187 births · 1 in 9,476 girls

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #1,286Deanna187
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 9,476 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 93.2% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Deanna
  1. #1,278Zayla189
  2. #1,284Roxanne188
  3. #1,284Salem188
  4. #1,286Deanna187
  5. #1,286Annaleigh187
  6. #1,286Asha187
  7. #1,286Colbie187
  8. #1,291Carson186
  9. #1,291Mireya186
  10. #1,291Zola186

Tied with 4 names at #1,286; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →