Deborah
#862 for girls in 2025, 313 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1955 · 52,318 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 742,820since 1880
Deborah over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #862 | 313 | — | |
| 2024 | #852 | 317 | — | |
| 2023 | #967 | 267 | — | |
| 2022 | #910 | 301 | — | |
| 2021 | #910 | 295 | — | |
| 2020 | #904 | 291 | — | |
| 2019 | #899 | 296 | — | |
| 2018 | #781 | 350 | — | |
| 2017 | #773 | 357 | — | |
| 2016 | #822 | 349 | — | |
| 2015 | #804 | 350 | — | |
| 2014 | #752 | 373 | — | |
| 2013 | #815 | 330 | — | |
| 2012 | #793 | 337 | — | |
| 2011 | #810 | 332 | — | |
| 2010 | #774 | 355 | — | |
| 2009 | #817 | 346 | — | |
| 2008 | #808 | 356 | — | |
| 2007 | #777 | 372 | — | |
| 2006 | #672 | 425 | — | |
| 2005 | #652 | 425 | — | |
| 2004 | #639 | 427 | — | |
| 2003 | #632 | 423 | — | |
| 2002 | #559 | 474 | — | |
| 2001 | #543 | 490 | — | |
| 2000 | #493 | 546 | — | |
| 1999 | #496 | 524 | — | |
| 1998 | #465 | 554 | — | |
| 1997 | #411 | 638 | — | |
| 1996 | #410 | 635 | — | |
| 1995 | #398 | 659 | — | |
| 1994 | #355 | 738 | — | |
| 1993 | #328 | 798 | — | |
| 1992 | #303 | 919 | — | |
| 1991 | #271 | 1,014 | — | |
| 1990 | #262 | 1,095 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #251 | 1,076 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #250 | 1,056 | — | |
| 1987 | #222 | 1,203 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #202 | 1,287 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #192 | 1,400 | #5,147 | 7 |
| 1984 | #187 | 1,468 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #171 | 1,609 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #160 | 1,840 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #148 | 1,907 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #146 | 1,937 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #132 | 2,180 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #118 | 2,479 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #109 | 2,676 | #2,202 | 21 |
| 1976 | #96 | 2,992 | #2,508 | 17 |
| 1975 | #86 | 3,414 | #2,637 | 15 |
| 1974 | #68 | 4,343 | #2,129 | 20 |
| 1973 | #56 | 4,980 | #1,586 | 30 |
| 1972 | #43 | 6,271 | #1,871 | 23 |
| 1971 | #33 | 8,675 | #1,415 | 36 |
| 1970 | #33 | 9,845 | #1,615 | 28 |
| 1969 | #27 | 11,187 | #1,414 | 32 |
| 1968 | #27 | 12,288 | #1,314 | 34 |
| 1967 | #22 | 14,012 | #1,030 | 50 |
| 1966 | #14 | 16,250 | #1,090 | 46 |
| 1965 | #13 | 17,081 | #1,129 | 44 |
| 1964 | #12 | 19,306 | #967 | 62 |
| 1963 | #13 | 21,053 | #1,037 | 53 |
| 1962 | #9 | 22,889 | #1,069 | 51 |
| 1961 | #10 | 24,107 | #1,042 | 56 |
| 1960 | #10 | 25,266 | #944 | 64 |
| 1959 | #9 | 29,546 | #919 | 69 |
| 1958 | #7 | 32,943 | #863 | 77 |
| 1957 | #6 | 40,096 | #823 | 84 |
| 1956 | #4 | 47,834 | #762 | 93 |
| 1955 | #2 | 52,318 | #728 | 100 |
| 1954 | #3 | 54,674 | #807 | 80 |
| 1953 | #3 | 52,199 | #786 | 82 |
| 1952 | #4 | 49,811 | #726 | 94 |
| 1951 | #4 | 42,053 | #892 | 62 |
| 1950 | #7 | 29,063 | #1,022 | 47 |
| 1949 | #15 | 19,209 | #1,380 | 28 |
| 1948 | #30 | 11,244 | #1,430 | 26 |
| 1947 | #62 | 5,837 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #119 | 2,471 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | #161 | 1,462 | — | |
| 1944 | #168 | 1,293 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #241 | 785 | #3,231 | 6 |
| 1942 | #265 | 676 | — | |
| 1941 | #259 | 607 | — | |
| 1940 | #290 | 470 | — | |
| 1939 | #293 | 443 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #308 | 410 | — | |
| 1937 | #358 | 322 | — | |
| 1936 | #366 | 300 | — | |
| 1935 | #378 | 281 | — | |
| 1934 | #383 | 280 | — | |
| 1933 | #409 | 242 | — | |
| 1932 | #455 | 207 | — | |
| 1931 | #524 | 158 | — | |
| 1930 | #529 | 165 | — | |
| 1929 | #534 | 161 | — | |
| 1928 | #618 | 130 | — | |
| 1927 | #757 | 91 | — | |
| 1926 | #673 | 116 | — | |
| 1925 | #819 | 82 | — | |
| 1924 | #663 | 125 | — | |
| 1923 | #683 | 118 | — | |
| 1922 | #866 | 71 | — | |
| 1921 | #753 | 94 | — | |
| 1920 | #797 | 82 | — | |
| 1919 | #833 | 70 | — | |
| 1918 | #743 | 92 | — | |
| 1917 | #746 | 89 | — | |
| 1916 | #718 | 90 | — | |
| 1915 | #644 | 105 | — | |
| 1914 | #726 | 62 | — | |
| 1913 | #810 | 42 | — | |
| 1912 | #890 | 32 | — | |
| 1911 | #722 | 36 | — | |
| 1910 | #737 | 33 | — | |
| 1909 | #791 | 26 | — | |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 | — | |
| 1907 | #819 | 21 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #872 | 18 | — | |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 | — | |
| 1903 | #734 | 21 | — | |
| 1902 | #756 | 21 | — | |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | — | |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | — | |
| 1899 | #983 | 11 | — | |
| 1898 | #719 | 21 | — | |
| 1897 | #644 | 23 | — | |
| 1896 | #754 | 18 | — | |
| 1895 | #893 | 13 | — | |
| 1894 | #697 | 18 | — | |
| 1893 | #571 | 24 | — | |
| 1892 | #726 | 16 | — | |
| 1891 | #695 | 15 | — | |
| 1890 | #538 | 24 | — | |
| 1889 | #757 | 12 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #586 | 15 | — | |
| 1886 | #731 | 10 | — | |
| 1885 | #695 | 10 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #480 | 16 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #447 | 14 | — | |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Deborah was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1887, when fewer than 16 girls a year got the name.
Where Deborah is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#6 · 1 in 61
- New Hampshire#7 · 1 in 54
- Hawaii#7 · 1 in 77
- Delaware#8 · 1 in 54
- Virginia#8 · 1 in 57
Best ever in a state: #1 in Rhode Island, 1953.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #6 | 214 | 1 in 61 |
| Hawaii | #7 | 83 | 1 in 77 |
| New Hampshire | #7 | 103 | 1 in 54 |
| Delaware | #8 | 81 | 1 in 54 |
| Florida | #8 | 752 | 1 in 65 |
| Maryland | #8 | 503 | 1 in 58 |
| Virginia | #8 | 705 | 1 in 57 |
| Alaska | #9 | 41 | 1 in 66 |
| Maine | #9 | 168 | 1 in 59 |
| Massachusetts | #9 | 879 | 1 in 58 |
| New York | #9 | 2,271 | 1 in 72 |
| Ohio | #9 | 1,298 | 1 in 76 |
| Pennsylvania | #9 | 1,511 | 1 in 69 |
| Vermont | #9 | 58 | 1 in 59 |
| California | #10 | 1,976 | 1 in 88 |
| Connecticut | #11 | 348 | 1 in 68 |
| Georgia | #11 | 661 | 1 in 66 |
| New Jersey | #11 | 783 | 1 in 73 |
| Rhode Island | #11 | 136 | 1 in 58 |
| Arizona | #12 | 158 | 1 in 98 |
| Michigan | #12 | 981 | 1 in 84 |
| Nevada | #12 | 39 | 1 in 70 |
| North Carolina | #13 | 696 | 1 in 69 |
| Kentucky | #14 | 410 | 1 in 75 |
| Mississippi | #14 | 273 | 1 in 91 |
| Illinois | #15 | 1,235 | 1 in 83 |
| Louisiana | #15 | 381 | 1 in 100 |
| Missouri | #15 | 504 | 1 in 85 |
| South Carolina | #15 | 346 | 1 in 73 |
| Tennessee | #15 | 486 | 1 in 73 |
| Alabama | #16 | 413 | 1 in 81 |
| Arkansas | #16 | 202 | 1 in 87 |
| Idaho | #16 | 63 | 1 in 96 |
| New Mexico | #16 | 113 | 1 in 102 |
| Colorado | #17 | 204 | 1 in 94 |
| Texas | #17 | 1,057 | 1 in 105 |
| West Virginia | #18 | 206 | 1 in 78 |
| Washington | #19 | 265 | 1 in 105 |
| Indiana | #20 | 503 | 1 in 96 |
| Kansas | #20 | 189 | 1 in 105 |
| Oklahoma | #20 | 213 | 1 in 97 |
| Wyoming | #21 | 29 | 1 in 88 |
| Montana | #25 | 60 | 1 in 104 |
| North Dakota | #25 | 53 | 1 in 117 |
| Nebraska | #26 | 131 | 1 in 109 |
| Iowa | #28 | 217 | 1 in 126 |
| Oregon | #28 | 130 | 1 in 118 |
| Wisconsin | #31 | 354 | 1 in 120 |
| Minnesota | #33 | 291 | 1 in 130 |
| South Dakota | #34 | 52 | 1 in 129 |
| Utah | #42 | 64 | 1 in 165 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deborah
- 10 spots since 2024 (#852 → #862)
- 42 spots since 2020 (#904 → #862)
- 58 spots since 2015 (#804 → #862)
- Biggest jump: 278 spots in 1900 (#983 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 271 spots in 1889 (#486 → #757)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1955 at #2 (52,318 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: 13 yrs · run 1950–1962
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1947–1976
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 36 girls born in 1954 were named Deborah (2.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,135 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #2 in 1955, was only 1 in 37 (2.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 58.0% of all girls named Deborah (430,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 143 | #447 (1881) | #573 |
| 1890s | 183 | #538 (1890) | #722 |
| 1900s | 226 | #699 (1901) | #761 |
| 1910s | 651 | #644 (1915) | #757 |
| 1920s | 1,070 | #534 (1929) | #716 |
| 1930s | 2,808 | #293 (1939) | #400 |
| 1940s | 44,054 | #15 (1949) | #161 |
| 1950s | 430,537 | #2 (1955) | #5 |
| 1960s | 183,439 | #9 (1962) | #16 |
| 1970s | 47,855 | #33 (1970) | #77 |
| 1980s | 14,783 | #146 (1980) | #193 |
| 1990s | 7,574 | #262 (1990) | #370 |
| 2000s | 4,284 | #493 (2000) | #659 |
| 2010s | 3,429 | #752 (2014) | #802 |
| 2020s | 1,784 | #852 (2024) | #901 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deborah in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 86 of them was named Deborah, which outranked 99.9% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 40,564 of them was named Deborah, which outranked 76.9% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,056Sharon52
- #1,056Sydney52
- #1,056Thor52
- #1,069Deborah51
- #1,069Abe51
- #1,069Alphonse51
- #1,069Asa51
- #1,082Antonia50
- #1,082Benjie50
- #1,082Delano50
Tied with 12 names at #1,069; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.