Deborah

#862 for girls in 2025, 313 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1955 · 52,318 births
Debut · girls
12 births
In top 100 · girls
30 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
742,820
since 1880

Deborah over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202015peak #2, 1955girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#862313—
2024#852317—
2023#967267—
2022#910301—
2021#910295—
2020#904291—
2019#899296—
2018#781350—
2017#773357—
2016#822349—
2015#804350—
2014#752373—
2013#815330—
2012#793337—
2011#810332—
2010#774355—
2009#817346—
2008#808356—
2007#777372—
2006#672425—
2005#652425—
2004#639427—
2003#632423—
2002#559474—
2001#543490—
2000#493546—
1999#496524—
1998#465554—
1997#411638—
1996#410635—
1995#398659—
1994#355738—
1993#328798—
1992#303919—
1991#2711,014—
1990#2621,095#8,1175
1989#2511,076#4,81110
1988#2501,056—
1987#2221,203#5,4597
1986#2021,287#5,3327
1985#1921,400#5,1477
1984#1871,468#5,5616
1983#1711,609#5,4846
1982#1601,840#4,2349
1981#1481,907#4,9617
1980#1461,937#4,9407
1979#1322,180#3,16813
1978#1182,479#3,21512
1977#1092,676#2,20221
1976#962,992#2,50817
1975#863,414#2,63715
1974#684,343#2,12920
1973#564,980#1,58630
1972#436,271#1,87123
1971#338,675#1,41536
1970#339,845#1,61528
1969#2711,187#1,41432
1968#2712,288#1,31434
1967#2214,012#1,03050
1966#1416,250#1,09046
1965#1317,081#1,12944
1964#1219,306#96762
1963#1321,053#1,03753
1962#922,889#1,06951
1961#1024,107#1,04256
1960#1025,266#94464
1959#929,546#91969
1958#732,943#86377
1957#640,096#82384
1956#447,834#76293
1955#252,318#728100
1954#354,674#80780
1953#352,199#78682
1952#449,811#72694
1951#442,053#89262
1950#729,063#1,02247
1949#1519,209#1,38028
1948#3011,244#1,43026
1947#625,837#2,35611
1946#1192,471#2,40310
1945#1611,462—
1944#1681,293#3,4305
1943#241785#3,2316
1942#265676—
1941#259607—
1940#290470—
1939#293443#3,1136
1938#308410—
1937#358322—
1936#366300—
1935#378281—
1934#383280—
1933#409242—
1932#455207—
1931#524158—
1930#529165—
1929#534161—
1928#618130—
1927#75791—
1926#673116—
1925#81982—
1924#663125—
1923#683118—
1922#86671—
1921#75394—
1920#79782—
1919#83370—
1918#74392—
1917#74689—
1916#71890—
1915#644105—
1914#72662—
1913#81042—
1912#89032—
1911#72236—
1910#73733—
1909#79126—
1908#76825—
1907#81921—
1906#74224—
1905#87218—
1904#72723—
1903#73421—
1902#75621—
1901#69921—
1900#70526—
1899#98311—
1898#71921—
1897#64423—
1896#75418—
1895#89313—
1894#69718—
1893#57124—
1892#72616—
1891#69515—
1890#53824—
1889#75712—
1888#48626—
1887#58615—
1886#73110—
1885#69510—
1884#58313—
1883#48016—
1882#47515—
1881#44714—
1880#49212—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Deborah was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1884–1887, when fewer than 16 girls a year got the name.

Where Deborah is popular in 2015

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedNHWashington: #833 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,478 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedWIMichigan: #833 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,688 girlsMINew York: #683 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 3,653 girlsNYMassachusetts: #513 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,528 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedORNevada: #451 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,826 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedSDIowa: #592 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,580 girlsIAIndiana: #618 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,063 girlsINOhio: #655 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,519 girlsOHPennsylvania: #941 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,866 girlsPANew Jersey: #616 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,097 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #827 for girls · 42 births · 1 in 4,889 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedUTColorado: #692 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,342 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedWVVirginia: #672 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,407 girlsVAMaryland: #528 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,410 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedARTennessee: #1,061 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,231 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #984 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,676 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #207 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 594 girlsDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #884 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,258 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedALGeorgia: #776 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,058 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Deborah, so not publishedHITexas: #689 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 3,689 girlsTXFlorida: #367 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 1,791 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#207 · 1 in 594
  2. Florida#367 · 1 in 1,791
  3. Nevada#451 · 1 in 1,826
  4. Massachusetts#513 · 1 in 2,528
  5. Maryland#528 · 1 in 2,410

Best ever in a state: #1 in Rhode Island, 1953.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#20761 in 594
Florida#367481 in 1,791
Nevada#45161 in 1,826
Massachusetts#513101 in 2,528
Maryland#528101 in 2,410
Iowa#59251 in 2,580
New Jersey#616121 in 3,097
Indiana#618101 in 3,063
Ohio#655151 in 3,519
Virginia#672111 in 3,407
New York#683251 in 3,653
Texas#689461 in 3,689
Colorado#69271 in 3,342
Georgia#776121 in 4,058
California#827421 in 4,889
Michigan#83391 in 4,688
Washington#83371 in 4,478
Louisiana#88451 in 4,258
Pennsylvania#94191 in 5,866
North Carolina#98481 in 5,676
Tennessee#1,06151 in 6,231
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Deborah
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 10 spots since 2024 (#852 → #862)
  • 42 spots since 2020 (#904 → #862)
  • 58 spots since 2015 (#804 → #862)
  • Biggest jump: 278 spots in 1900 (#983 → #705)
  • Biggest drop: 271 spots in 1889 (#486 → #757)
Rise & fade · girls
75 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1955 at #2 (52,318 births)
  • Births halved by 1960, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: 13 yrs · run 1950–1962
  • Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1947–1976
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 36
  • Highest: 1 in 36 girls born in 1954 were named Deborah (2.8%)
  • Latest: 1 in 5,135 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #2 in 1955, was only 1 in 37 (2.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 58.0% of all girls named Deborah (430,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s143#447 (1881)#573
1890s183#538 (1890)#722
1900s226#699 (1901)#761
1910s651#644 (1915)#757
1920s1,070#534 (1929)#716
1930s2,808#293 (1939)#400
1940s44,054#15 (1949)#161
1950s430,537#2 (1955)#5
1960s183,439#9 (1962)#16
1970s47,855#33 (1970)#77
1980s14,783#146 (1980)#193
1990s7,574#262 (1990)#370
2000s4,284#493 (2000)#659
2010s3,429#752 (2014)#802
2020s1,784#852 (2024)#901

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Deborah in 2015

girls
#804
350 births · 1 in 5,100 girls

Top girls' names in 2015

  1. #1Emma20,487
  2. #2Olivia19,729
  3. #3Sophia17,454
  4. #4Ava16,416
  5. #5Isabella15,667
  6. #6Mia14,943
  7. #7Abigail12,422
  8. #8Emily11,808
  9. #9Charlotte11,415
  10. #10Harper10,311
  11. #804Deborah350
More about 2015

girls

1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 5,100 of them was named Deborah, which outranked 95.8% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Deborah
  1. #801Milania352
  2. #802Patricia351
  3. #802Salma351
  4. #804Deborah350
  5. #805Brenda349
  6. #805Desiree349
  7. #805Julieta349
Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,984Alaia#2,648 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,835Meilani#2,781 → #946
  3. ↑ 1,733Aitana#2,648 → #915
  4. ↑ 1,387Aislinn#2,351 → #964
  5. ↑ 1,072Taya#2,049 → #977
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,075Isis#703 → #1,778
  2. ↓ 502Annabell#923 → #1,425
  3. ↓ 500Anabel#911 → #1,411
  4. ↓ 344Cindy#711 → #1,055
  5. ↓ 334Anabella#529 → #863

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2015 →