Deondra
- Last seen for girls in 2016 at #16,215
- Last seen for boys in 2016 at #12,185
- Given to girls 76.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1985 · 73 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,354since 1957
Deondra over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | #11,257 | 9 | — | |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | — | |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | — | |
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | #7,742 | 16 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,592 | 19 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #5,800 | 21 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #4,906 | 24 | #4,703 | 16 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | #4,890 | 15 |
| 2000 | #3,169 | 43 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #5,661 | 18 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #2,889 | 45 | #4,650 | 14 |
| 1997 | #2,934 | 41 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #2,672 | 46 | #4,878 | 12 |
| 1995 | #2,623 | 47 | #4,280 | 14 |
| 1994 | #2,465 | 51 | #3,326 | 20 |
| 1993 | #2,176 | 61 | #3,819 | 16 |
| 1992 | #2,386 | 54 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #2,449 | 51 | #3,636 | 16 |
| 1990 | #2,201 | 58 | #2,952 | 21 |
| 1989 | #2,096 | 59 | #3,446 | 16 |
| 1988 | #1,952 | 62 | #2,961 | 18 |
| 1987 | #2,434 | 42 | #3,731 | 12 |
| 1986 | #2,228 | 46 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #1,621 | 73 | #3,070 | 15 |
| 1984 | #2,299 | 42 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,109 | 18 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 | #3,108 | 14 |
| 1981 | #3,625 | 22 | #2,898 | 15 |
| 1980 | #4,327 | 17 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #2,795 | 31 | #3,018 | 14 |
| 1978 | #4,459 | 15 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #3,761 | 19 | #3,606 | 10 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #3,724 | 9 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #3,659 | 9 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #4,523 | 12 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #3,166 | 21 | #3,370 | 9 |
| 1970 | #3,311 | 19 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | #3,935 | 6 |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1957
The first year at least five girls were named Deondra! It came in at #5,377, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958–1962, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Deondra is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Deondra in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Deondra
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2016
Rise & fade · girls
28 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1957
- Peaked 1985 at #1,621 (73 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 23,573
- Highest: 1 in 23,573 girls born in 1985 were named Deondra (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 354,404 girls born in 2016 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
- 34.9% of all girls named Deondra (472) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 6 | #5,377 (1957) | #5,377 |
| 1960s | 60 | #3,484 (1967) | #4,541 |
| 1970s | 167 | #2,795 (1979) | #4,074 |
| 1980s | 405 | #1,621 (1985) | #2,811 |
| 1990s | 472 | #2,176 (1993) | #2,846 |
| 2000s | 187 | #3,169 (2000) | #6,333 |
| 2010s | 57 | #9,150 (2011) | #12,685 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Deondra ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: