Diamond
- #2,017 for girls in 2025, 94 births
- #3,181 for boys in 2025, 37 births
- Given to girls 92.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 2,160 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 33,733since 1908
Diamond over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,017 | 94 | #3,181 | 37 |
| 2024 | #1,613 | 129 | #2,444 | 56 |
| 2023 | #1,603 | 130 | #2,895 | 43 |
| 2022 | #1,590 | 133 | #2,517 | 54 |
| 2021 | #1,410 | 154 | #2,918 | 42 |
| 2020 | #1,334 | 165 | #3,136 | 36 |
| 2019 | #1,218 | 192 | #3,347 | 34 |
| 2018 | #1,122 | 218 | #4,094 | 25 |
| 2017 | #1,108 | 227 | #3,586 | 30 |
| 2016 | #1,113 | 228 | #3,293 | 34 |
| 2015 | #1,014 | 264 | #3,231 | 35 |
| 2014 | #884 | 308 | #4,392 | 22 |
| 2013 | #707 | 395 | #4,463 | 21 |
| 2012 | #787 | 347 | #5,256 | 17 |
| 2011 | #759 | 363 | #3,695 | 28 |
| 2010 | #633 | 463 | #3,377 | 32 |
| 2009 | #495 | 618 | #4,748 | 20 |
| 2008 | #446 | 706 | #3,744 | 28 |
| 2007 | #356 | 912 | #3,591 | 29 |
| 2006 | #315 | 1,053 | #3,602 | 28 |
| 2005 | #301 | 1,057 | #3,528 | 27 |
| 2004 | #263 | 1,223 | #3,217 | 30 |
| 2003 | #235 | 1,400 | #2,392 | 44 |
| 2002 | #207 | 1,579 | #2,755 | 34 |
| 2001 | #167 | 1,945 | #1,935 | 56 |
| 2000 | #162 | 2,081 | #2,222 | 44 |
| 1999 | #150 | 2,160 | #1,932 | 50 |
| 1998 | #164 | 1,919 | #1,418 | 80 |
| 1997 | #181 | 1,676 | #1,402 | 78 |
| 1996 | #179 | 1,697 | #1,303 | 84 |
| 1995 | #179 | 1,682 | #1,244 | 87 |
| 1994 | #170 | 1,786 | #1,128 | 101 |
| 1993 | #192 | 1,522 | #1,185 | 89 |
| 1992 | #219 | 1,301 | #1,119 | 96 |
| 1991 | #324 | 826 | #1,147 | 92 |
| 1990 | #429 | 591 | #1,326 | 70 |
| 1989 | #516 | 455 | #1,308 | 70 |
| 1988 | #596 | 336 | #1,395 | 56 |
| 1987 | #702 | 260 | #1,506 | 47 |
| 1986 | #958 | 164 | #1,457 | 47 |
| 1985 | #1,060 | 139 | #1,416 | 48 |
| 1984 | #1,272 | 99 | #1,630 | 36 |
| 1983 | #1,379 | 86 | #2,085 | 25 |
| 1982 | #1,363 | 90 | #1,815 | 31 |
| 1981 | #1,912 | 56 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #1,833 | 59 | #1,910 | 29 |
| 1979 | #2,112 | 47 | #1,670 | 34 |
| 1978 | #1,824 | 55 | #2,375 | 19 |
| 1977 | #2,423 | 36 | #2,556 | 17 |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 | #2,601 | 16 |
| 1975 | #3,637 | 18 | #2,001 | 23 |
| 1974 | #3,426 | 19 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #2,418 | 15 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | — | #3,521 | 8 | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #3,356 | 7 |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,827 | 5 | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,373 | 6 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,770 | 8 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | — | #2,788 | 8 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | #3,525 | 5 | |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | #2,940 | 7 | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #2,854 | 7 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | #3,268 | 6 | |
| 1932 | #3,047 | 9 | — | |
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #2,703 | 10 |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | #2,904 | 9 |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #2,973 | 11 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #2,941 | 11 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #2,899 | 11 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #2,674 | 12 | #2,398 | 12 |
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 | #2,562 | 10 |
| 1916 | #2,833 | 10 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | — | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | #942 | 6 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1908
The first year at least five girls were named Diamond! It came in at #1,862, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1911, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Diamond is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Tennessee#888 · 1 in 4,582
- Michigan#1,061 · 1 in 5,955
- North Carolina#1,281 · 1 in 7,747
- New York#1,526 · 1 in 9,791
- Florida#1,887 · 1 in 14,460
Best ever in a state: #8 in District of Columbia, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee | #888 | 7 | 1 in 4,582 |
| Michigan | #1,061 | 6 | 1 in 5,955 |
| North Carolina | #1,281 | 6 | 1 in 7,747 |
| New York | #1,526 | 8 | 1 in 9,791 |
| Florida | #1,887 | 6 | 1 in 14,460 |
| Texas | #2,636 | 7 | 1 in 22,935 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Diamond
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 683 spots since 2020 (#1,334 → #2,017)
- Biggest jump: 256 spots in 1987
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014
Rise & fade · girls
91 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1908
- Peaked 1999 at #150 (2,160 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 29 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1986–2014
Share of babies · girls
1 in 821
- Highest: 1 in 821 girls born in 1999 were named Diamond (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,099 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
- 44.9% of all girls named Diamond (15,160) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1976
- Mostly boys until 1975, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 12 | #1,862 (1908) | #1,910 |
| 1910s | 65 | #1,935 (1910) | #2,909 |
| 1920s | 82 | #2,899 (1920) | #3,704 |
| 1930s | 9 | #3,047 (1932) | #3,047 |
| 1940s | 10 | #4,556 (1945) | #4,900 |
| 1950s | 14 | #4,837 (1956) | #4,934 |
| 1960s | 35 | #4,779 (1968) | #5,654 |
| 1970s | 218 | #1,824 (1978) | #3,941 |
| 1980s | 1,744 | #516 (1989) | #1,159 |
| 1990s | 15,160 | #150 (1999) | #219 |
| 2000s | 12,574 | #162 (2000) | #295 |
| 2010s | 3,005 | #633 (2010) | #935 |
| 2020s | 805 | #1,334 (2020) | #1,595 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Diamond ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: