Dima
- #7,885 for girls in 2025, 13 births
- Last seen for boys in 2024 at #10,938
- Given to girls 83.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2016 · 26 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 410since 1983
Dima over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,885 | 13 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,642 | 17 | #10,938 | 6 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | — | |
| 2021 | #6,174 | 19 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,325 | 18 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,342 | 15 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,010 | 20 | #8,819 | 8 |
| 2017 | #5,661 | 22 | — | |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,977 | 17 | — | |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | — | |
| 2013 | #7,372 | 16 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | — | |
| 2003 | #8,505 | 12 | — | |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #8,196 | 12 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 | — | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | — | #9,015 | 5 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1983
The first year at least five girls were named Dima! It came in at #10,275, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1983–1989, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Dima is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Dima in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Dima
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 1,243 spots since 2024 (#6,642 → #7,885)
- 1,560 spots since 2020 (#6,325 → #7,885)
- 908 spots since 2015 (#6,977 → #7,885)
Rise & fade · girls
33 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1983
- Peaked 2016 at #5,130 (26 births)
- Births halved by 2022, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 68,155
- Highest: 1 in 68,155 girls born in 2016 were named Dima (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 123,636 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 40.7% of all girls named Dima (167) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2008
- Mostly boys until 2007, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | #10,275 (1983) | #10,275 |
| 1990s | 62 | #5,445 (1994) | #8,893 |
| 2000s | 89 | #8,196 (2001) | #11,476 |
| 2010s | 167 | #5,130 (2016) | #7,433 |
| 2020s | 87 | #6,174 (2021) | #7,790 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Dima ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: