Dior
- #1,125 for girls in 2025, 208 births
- #1,585 for boys in 2025, 107 births
- Given to girls 71.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 613 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,260since 1977
Dior over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,125 | 208 | #1,585 | 107 |
| 2024 | #978 | 265 | #1,321 | 146 |
| 2023 | #730 | 385 | #1,226 | 161 |
| 2022 | #642 | 458 | #842 | 289 |
| 2021 | #542 | 564 | #879 | 263 |
| 2020 | #499 | 613 | #866 | 261 |
| 2019 | #605 | 500 | #1,303 | 141 |
| 2018 | #793 | 344 | #1,994 | 73 |
| 2017 | #1,360 | 170 | #3,889 | 27 |
| 2016 | #1,456 | 158 | #3,111 | 37 |
| 2015 | #1,437 | 160 | #3,299 | 34 |
| 2014 | #1,534 | 142 | #2,622 | 46 |
| 2013 | #1,660 | 128 | #3,265 | 33 |
| 2012 | #1,680 | 126 | #3,371 | 32 |
| 2011 | #1,619 | 133 | #3,605 | 29 |
| 2010 | #1,769 | 116 | #2,579 | 47 |
| 2009 | #1,650 | 135 | #3,399 | 32 |
| 2008 | #2,137 | 94 | #2,879 | 41 |
| 2007 | #2,328 | 82 | #4,493 | 21 |
| 2006 | #2,375 | 79 | #2,832 | 40 |
| 2005 | #2,902 | 56 | #3,389 | 29 |
| 2004 | #2,808 | 57 | #4,793 | 17 |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | #4,114 | 20 |
| 2002 | #5,444 | 21 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #8,196 | 12 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #5,896 | 17 | #4,341 | 16 |
| 1998 | #8,584 | 10 | #6,314 | 9 |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #4,878 | 12 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #6,407 | 8 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #7,067 | 12 | #4,114 | 14 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #3,636 | 16 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #4,407 | 12 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | #3,915 | 12 |
| 1987 | — | #4,239 | 10 | |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #3,530 | 23 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1977
The first year at least five girls were named Dior! It came in at #8,444, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1978, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Dior is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #427 | 12 | 1 in 1,665 |
| Michigan | #457 | 18 | 1 in 1,985 |
| Nevada | #508 | 5 | 1 in 1,840 |
| Ohio | #531 | 19 | 1 in 2,488 |
| Alabama | #574 | 8 | 1 in 2,290 |
| Louisiana | #597 | 7 | 1 in 2,339 |
| Georgia | #676 | 15 | 1 in 3,014 |
| Missouri | #728 | 7 | 1 in 3,471 |
| Virginia | #758 | 9 | 1 in 3,749 |
| Wisconsin | #791 | 5 | 1 in 4,052 |
| Illinois | #927 | 9 | 1 in 4,925 |
| North Carolina | #1,138 | 7 | 1 in 6,640 |
| Florida | #1,170 | 12 | 1 in 7,230 |
| California | #1,228 | 20 | 1 in 8,086 |
| New York | #1,654 | 7 | 1 in 11,190 |
| Texas | #1,902 | 11 | 1 in 14,595 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dior
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 626 spots since 2020 (#499 → #1,125)
- 312 spots since 2015 (#1,437 → #1,125)
- Biggest jump: 567 spots in 2018
- Biggest drop: 248 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
43 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1977
- Peaked 2020 at #499 (613 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 2018–2024
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,637
- Highest: 1 in 2,637 girls born in 2020 were named Dior (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,727 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 47.4% of all girls named Dior (2,493) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1993
- Mostly boys until 1992, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13 | #8,061 (1979) | #8,253 |
| 1980s | 86 | #3,530 (1982) | #6,866 |
| 1990s | 114 | #5,896 (1999) | #7,633 |
| 2000s | 577 | #1,650 (2009) | #4,029 |
| 2010s | 1,977 | #605 (2019) | #1,391 |
| 2020s | 2,493 | #499 (2020) | #753 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Dior ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: