Dolores
- #2,564 for girls in 2025, 68 births
- Last seen for boys in 1992 at #8,435
- Given to girls 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1930 · 12,842 births
- Debut · girls
- 13 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 22 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 211,440since 1880
Dolores over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,564 | 68 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,176 | 50 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,588 | 68 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,364 | 78 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,958 | 56 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,931 | 55 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,665 | 41 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,853 | 38 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,247 | 49 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,229 | 50 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,295 | 33 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,652 | 42 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,918 | 38 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,047 | 37 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,781 | 40 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,397 | 33 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,870 | 40 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,855 | 62 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,930 | 61 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,206 | 87 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,257 | 47 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,589 | 64 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,577 | 62 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,046 | 84 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,887 | 92 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,923 | 88 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,828 | 87 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,567 | 105 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,552 | 104 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,296 | 133 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,330 | 124 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,337 | 126 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,120 | 160 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,207 | 144 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #1,248 | 135 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,036 | 173 | — | |
| 1989 | #958 | 182 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #1,073 | 147 | — | |
| 1987 | #882 | 192 | — | |
| 1986 | #922 | 174 | — | |
| 1985 | #819 | 199 | — | |
| 1984 | #862 | 177 | — | |
| 1983 | #748 | 218 | — | |
| 1982 | #639 | 280 | — | |
| 1981 | #632 | 282 | — | |
| 1980 | #655 | 279 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #610 | 290 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #608 | 281 | — | |
| 1977 | #586 | 295 | — | |
| 1976 | #540 | 324 | — | |
| 1975 | #572 | 289 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #550 | 305 | — | |
| 1973 | #481 | 372 | #3,694 | 8 |
| 1972 | #466 | 397 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #438 | 478 | — | |
| 1970 | #407 | 563 | #3,071 | 10 |
| 1969 | #388 | 586 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #373 | 594 | #3,673 | 6 |
| 1967 | #339 | 678 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #319 | 771 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #312 | 828 | #2,780 | 9 |
| 1964 | #274 | 1,082 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #268 | 1,111 | #2,673 | 10 |
| 1962 | #249 | 1,274 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #235 | 1,340 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #232 | 1,366 | #2,423 | 12 |
| 1959 | #222 | 1,418 | #2,111 | 15 |
| 1958 | #210 | 1,524 | #2,642 | 10 |
| 1957 | #212 | 1,572 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #198 | 1,660 | #2,969 | 8 |
| 1955 | #190 | 1,778 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #174 | 1,963 | #2,449 | 11 |
| 1953 | #165 | 1,978 | #1,836 | 18 |
| 1952 | #160 | 2,044 | #2,376 | 11 |
| 1951 | #149 | 2,141 | #1,774 | 18 |
| 1950 | #139 | 2,226 | #1,538 | 23 |
| 1949 | #130 | 2,464 | #1,616 | 21 |
| 1948 | #119 | 2,762 | #1,881 | 16 |
| 1947 | #111 | 3,071 | #1,646 | 21 |
| 1946 | #104 | 3,064 | #1,557 | 21 |
| 1945 | #103 | 2,704 | #1,633 | 17 |
| 1944 | #92 | 3,081 | #1,235 | 29 |
| 1943 | #74 | 3,698 | #1,699 | 18 |
| 1942 | #63 | 4,267 | #1,244 | 31 |
| 1941 | #57 | 4,384 | #1,129 | 34 |
| 1940 | #67 | 3,604 | #1,397 | 23 |
| 1939 | #58 | 3,980 | #1,194 | 30 |
| 1938 | #43 | 4,809 | #1,125 | 33 |
| 1937 | #37 | 5,568 | #1,016 | 39 |
| 1936 | #30 | 6,417 | #1,068 | 36 |
| 1935 | #26 | 7,375 | #834 | 56 |
| 1934 | #26 | 7,689 | #956 | 44 |
| 1933 | #21 | 8,022 | #980 | 42 |
| 1932 | #18 | 9,630 | #874 | 53 |
| 1931 | #14 | 10,807 | #959 | 47 |
| 1930 | #13 | 12,842 | #710 | 77 |
| 1929 | #14 | 11,508 | #914 | 54 |
| 1928 | #20 | 9,615 | #992 | 48 |
| 1927 | #34 | 6,769 | #1,178 | 37 |
| 1926 | #49 | 5,218 | #1,296 | 31 |
| 1925 | #64 | 4,145 | #1,304 | 31 |
| 1924 | #75 | 3,729 | #1,263 | 33 |
| 1923 | #83 | 3,369 | #1,589 | 23 |
| 1922 | #104 | 2,714 | #1,827 | 19 |
| 1921 | #111 | 2,558 | #2,059 | 16 |
| 1920 | #110 | 2,365 | #1,885 | 18 |
| 1919 | #124 | 1,911 | #2,511 | 11 |
| 1918 | #127 | 1,835 | #1,998 | 16 |
| 1917 | #139 | 1,562 | #1,755 | 18 |
| 1916 | #146 | 1,374 | #2,259 | 12 |
| 1915 | #147 | 1,280 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #155 | 934 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #165 | 706 | — | |
| 1912 | #185 | 522 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #196 | 363 | — | |
| 1910 | #220 | 294 | — | |
| 1909 | #238 | 220 | — | |
| 1908 | #233 | 212 | — | |
| 1907 | #244 | 192 | — | |
| 1906 | #237 | 183 | — | |
| 1905 | #277 | 142 | — | |
| 1904 | #268 | 138 | — | |
| 1903 | #292 | 114 | — | |
| 1902 | #304 | 108 | — | |
| 1901 | #364 | 68 | — | |
| 1900 | #352 | 91 | — | |
| 1899 | #366 | 64 | — | |
| 1898 | #411 | 56 | — | |
| 1897 | #420 | 48 | — | |
| 1896 | #462 | 39 | — | |
| 1895 | #440 | 41 | — | |
| 1894 | #382 | 54 | — | |
| 1893 | #487 | 31 | — | |
| 1892 | #510 | 28 | — | |
| 1891 | #514 | 25 | — | |
| 1890 | #570 | 21 | — | |
| 1889 | #600 | 18 | — | |
| 1888 | #451 | 30 | — | |
| 1887 | #608 | 14 | — | |
| 1886 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #517 | 14 | — | |
| 1882 | #596 | 10 | — | |
| 1881 | #539 | 10 | — | |
| 1880 | #466 | 13 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Dolores was already there! It came in at #466, and was given to 13 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 15 girls a year got the name.
Where Dolores is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#1,651 · 1 in 12,440
- Texas#1,714 · 1 in 12,349
- Florida#2,151 · 1 in 17,352
Best ever in a state: #4 in Illinois, 1928.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,651 | 13 | 1 in 12,440 |
| Texas | #1,714 | 13 | 1 in 12,349 |
| Florida | #2,151 | 5 | 1 in 17,352 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dolores
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 367 spots since 2020 (#2,931 → #2,564)
- Biggest jump: 157 spots in 1888
- Biggest drop: 191 spots in 1988
Rise & fade · girls
50 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1930 at #13 (12,842 births)
- Births halved by 1936, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 22 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 22 yrs · run 1923–1944
- Top 1,000: 109 yrs · run 1880–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 88
- Highest: 1 in 88 girls born in 1930 were named Dolores (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 23,636 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
- 36.5% of all girls named Dolores (77,139) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 144 | #451 (1888) | #571 |
| 1890s | 407 | #366 (1899) | #456 |
| 1900s | 1,468 | #233 (1908) | #281 |
| 1910s | 10,781 | #124 (1919) | #160 |
| 1920s | 51,990 | #14 (1929) | #66 |
| 1930s | 77,139 | #13 (1930) | #29 |
| 1940s | 33,099 | #57 (1941) | #92 |
| 1950s | 18,304 | #139 (1950) | #182 |
| 1960s | 9,630 | #232 (1960) | #299 |
| 1970s | 3,594 | #407 (1970) | #526 |
| 1980s | 2,130 | #632 (1981) | #819 |
| 1990s | 1,291 | #1,036 (1990) | #1,352 |
| 2000s | 687 | #1,887 (2001) | #2,614 |
| 2010s | 401 | #3,229 (2016) | #3,808 |
| 2020s | 375 | #2,364 (2022) | #2,764 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Dolores ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: