Dominick
- Last seen for girls in 2012 at #14,962
- #622 for boys in 2025, 448 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1914 · 424 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 67,180since 1881
Dominick over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Dominick has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #622 | 448 | |
| 2024 | — | #550 | 541 | |
| 2023 | — | #553 | 529 | |
| 2022 | — | #523 | 567 | |
| 2021 | — | #484 | 616 | |
| 2020 | — | #446 | 670 | |
| 2019 | — | #430 | 714 | |
| 2018 | — | #410 | 779 | |
| 2017 | — | #362 | 908 | |
| 2016 | — | #337 | 1,033 | |
| 2015 | — | #318 | 1,113 | |
| 2014 | — | #309 | 1,129 | |
| 2013 | — | #275 | 1,286 | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #262 | 1,364 |
| 2011 | — | #268 | 1,296 | |
| 2010 | — | #261 | 1,325 | |
| 2009 | — | #246 | 1,440 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #239 | 1,542 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #226 | 1,631 |
| 2006 | — | #215 | 1,734 | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #214 | 1,689 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #217 | 1,605 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #205 | 1,780 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #224 | 1,556 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #276 | 1,110 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #271 | 1,190 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #265 | 1,134 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #264 | 1,096 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #258 | 1,097 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #289 | 933 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #302 | 882 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 | #303 | 884 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #302 | 905 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #317 | 821 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #366 | 643 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #393 | 590 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #395 | 551 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #412 | 480 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #427 | 423 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #419 | 419 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #413 | 423 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #430 | 376 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #478 | 311 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #461 | 342 |
| 1981 | — | #459 | 326 | |
| 1980 | — | #467 | 322 | |
| 1979 | — | #451 | 322 | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #443 | 320 |
| 1977 | — | #448 | 319 | |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #477 | 275 |
| 1975 | — | #472 | 291 | |
| 1974 | — | #499 | 253 | |
| 1973 | — | #483 | 266 | |
| 1972 | — | #472 | 277 | |
| 1971 | — | #513 | 253 | |
| 1970 | — | #467 | 301 | |
| 1969 | — | #432 | 335 | |
| 1968 | — | #456 | 282 | |
| 1967 | — | #472 | 256 | |
| 1966 | — | #430 | 315 | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #439 | 307 |
| 1964 | — | #451 | 313 | |
| 1963 | — | #434 | 337 | |
| 1962 | — | #461 | 299 | |
| 1961 | — | #455 | 313 | |
| 1960 | — | #431 | 346 | |
| 1959 | — | #439 | 329 | |
| 1958 | — | #426 | 340 | |
| 1957 | — | #436 | 313 | |
| 1956 | — | #415 | 337 | |
| 1955 | — | #398 | 332 | |
| 1954 | — | #403 | 315 | |
| 1953 | — | #389 | 324 | |
| 1952 | — | #376 | 329 | |
| 1951 | — | #385 | 311 | |
| 1950 | — | #419 | 257 | |
| 1949 | — | #425 | 256 | |
| 1948 | — | #413 | 267 | |
| 1947 | — | #404 | 288 | |
| 1946 | — | #409 | 242 | |
| 1945 | — | #390 | 235 | |
| 1944 | — | #373 | 257 | |
| 1943 | — | #365 | 282 | |
| 1942 | — | #340 | 320 | |
| 1941 | — | #353 | 273 | |
| 1940 | — | #372 | 236 | |
| 1939 | — | #375 | 231 | |
| 1938 | — | #367 | 234 | |
| 1937 | — | #342 | 250 | |
| 1936 | — | #351 | 237 | |
| 1935 | — | #331 | 271 | |
| 1934 | — | #343 | 254 | |
| 1933 | — | #306 | 308 | |
| 1932 | — | #284 | 366 | |
| 1931 | — | #280 | 390 | |
| 1930 | — | #277 | 423 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #259 | 465 |
| 1928 | — | #260 | 474 | |
| 1927 | — | #255 | 501 | |
| 1926 | — | #261 | 465 | |
| 1925 | — | #244 | 538 | |
| 1924 | — | #235 | 579 | |
| 1923 | — | #227 | 580 | |
| 1922 | — | #239 | 548 | |
| 1921 | — | #232 | 575 | |
| 1920 | — | #225 | 564 | |
| 1919 | — | #238 | 489 | |
| 1918 | — | #210 | 594 | |
| 1917 | — | #218 | 508 | |
| 1916 | — | #201 | 567 | |
| 1915 | — | #208 | 521 | |
| 1914 | — | #197 | 424 | |
| 1913 | — | #204 | 325 | |
| 1912 | — | #203 | 275 | |
| 1911 | — | #235 | 119 | |
| 1910 | — | #249 | 93 | |
| 1909 | — | #226 | 91 | |
| 1908 | — | #272 | 62 | |
| 1907 | — | #266 | 62 | |
| 1906 | — | #309 | 44 | |
| 1905 | — | #370 | 31 | |
| 1904 | — | #390 | 28 | |
| 1903 | — | #322 | 34 | |
| 1902 | — | #490 | 19 | |
| 1901 | — | #334 | 29 | |
| 1900 | — | #455 | 25 | |
| 1899 | — | #315 | 31 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #534 | 15 | |
| 1895 | — | #529 | 15 | |
| 1894 | — | #464 | 18 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #635 | 9 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #498 | 14 | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #752 | 7 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | #836 | 6 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five boys were named Dominick! It came in at #781, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Dominick is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Jersey#272 · 1 in 1,205
- New York#282 · 1 in 1,279
- Maryland#389 · 1 in 1,761
- Florida#466 · 1 in 2,450
- Illinois#470 · 1 in 2,252
Best ever in a state: #44 in New Jersey, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #272 | 33 | 1 in 1,205 |
| New York | #282 | 66 | 1 in 1,279 |
| Maryland | #389 | 13 | 1 in 1,761 |
| Florida | #466 | 39 | 1 in 2,450 |
| Illinois | #470 | 22 | 1 in 2,252 |
| Connecticut | #498 | 5 | 1 in 2,641 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 9 | 1 in 3,002 |
| Pennsylvania | #546 | 17 | 1 in 3,074 |
| California | #551 | 55 | 1 in 3,190 |
| Arizona | #559 | 12 | 1 in 2,727 |
| Missouri | #559 | 10 | 1 in 2,781 |
| Utah | #561 | 7 | 1 in 2,809 |
| Colorado | #571 | 9 | 1 in 2,983 |
| Oregon | #604 | 5 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Michigan | #641 | 12 | 1 in 3,350 |
| Indiana | #668 | 9 | 1 in 3,518 |
| South Carolina | #743 | 5 | 1 in 4,240 |
| Georgia | #756 | 12 | 1 in 4,185 |
| Louisiana | #775 | 5 | 1 in 3,826 |
| North Carolina | #775 | 11 | 1 in 4,679 |
| Minnesota | #807 | 5 | 1 in 4,900 |
| Virginia | #875 | 7 | 1 in 5,322 |
| Texas | #892 | 28 | 1 in 6,252 |
| Washington | #898 | 6 | 1 in 5,466 |
| Ohio | #1,015 | 7 | 1 in 7,505 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dominick
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 176 spots since 2020 (#446 → #622)
- Biggest jump: 223 spots in 1883
- Biggest drop: 162 spots in 1882
Rise & fade · boys
33 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1914 at #197 (424 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 142 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 142 yrs · run 1889–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,110
- Highest: 1 in 1,110 boys born in 2003 were named Dominick (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,813 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #197 in 1914, was only 1 in 1,544 (0.06%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 22.7% of all boys named Dominick (15,277) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | #498 (1889) | #755 |
| 1890s | 166 | #315 (1899) | #506 |
| 1900s | 425 | #226 (1909) | #343 |
| 1910s | 3,915 | #197 (1914) | #216 |
| 1920s | 5,289 | #225 (1920) | #244 |
| 1930s | 2,964 | #277 (1930) | #326 |
| 1940s | 2,656 | #340 (1942) | #384 |
| 1950s | 3,187 | #376 (1952) | #409 |
| 1960s | 3,103 | #430 (1966) | #446 |
| 1970s | 2,877 | #443 (1978) | #473 |
| 1980s | 3,973 | #395 (1989) | #436 |
| 1990s | 8,985 | #258 (1997) | #306 |
| 2000s | 15,277 | #205 (2003) | #233 |
| 2010s | 10,947 | #261 (2010) | #323 |
| 2020s | 3,371 | #446 (2020) | #530 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Dominick ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: