Dona
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · Last seen for boys in 1982 at #6,385
Given to girls 99.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1933 · 411 births
- Debut · girls
- 18 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 18,857since 1880
Dona over time
Rank among girls' names. Dona has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | — | |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | — | |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | — | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | — | |
| 2013 | #10,235 | 10 | — | |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | — | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | — | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | — | |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | — | |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | — | |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | — | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | — | |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,619 | 16 | — | |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | — | |
| 1999 | #5,896 | 17 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,417 | 18 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | — | |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | — | |
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | — | |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,866 | 27 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,722 | 28 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,714 | 28 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,402 | 30 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,306 | 29 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,524 | 25 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,645 | 23 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,939 | 31 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,144 | 27 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,721 | 32 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,451 | 39 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #2,847 | 31 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,904 | 56 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,218 | 44 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,987 | 48 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,857 | 54 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,840 | 50 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,625 | 60 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,386 | 74 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,169 | 93 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,105 | 101 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,039 | 117 | — | |
| 1970 | #880 | 151 | — | |
| 1969 | #836 | 153 | — | |
| 1968 | #826 | 151 | — | |
| 1967 | #748 | 173 | — | |
| 1966 | #690 | 201 | — | |
| 1965 | #703 | 197 | — | |
| 1964 | #648 | 248 | — | |
| 1963 | #647 | 243 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #593 | 281 | — | |
| 1961 | #591 | 290 | — | |
| 1960 | #555 | 310 | — | |
| 1959 | #524 | 343 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #532 | 331 | — | |
| 1957 | #515 | 342 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #448 | 420 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | #437 | 418 | — | |
| 1954 | #391 | 487 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #437 | 404 | — | |
| 1952 | #447 | 369 | — | |
| 1951 | #404 | 418 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #411 | 378 | — | |
| 1949 | #424 | 344 | — | |
| 1948 | #412 | 370 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #409 | 389 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #402 | 359 | — | |
| 1945 | #419 | 289 | — | |
| 1944 | #375 | 354 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #361 | 397 | — | |
| 1942 | #379 | 354 | — | |
| 1941 | #398 | 297 | — | |
| 1940 | #419 | 267 | — | |
| 1939 | #422 | 259 | — | |
| 1938 | #395 | 287 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #382 | 286 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1936 | #362 | 303 | — | |
| 1935 | #373 | 287 | — | |
| 1934 | #338 | 348 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #301 | 411 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #306 | 425 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #316 | 411 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #329 | 401 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #340 | 363 | — | |
| 1928 | #346 | 381 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | #345 | 376 | #2,703 | 10 |
| 1926 | #403 | 288 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #480 | 212 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #541 | 179 | — | |
| 1923 | #524 | 181 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #563 | 161 | — | |
| 1921 | #636 | 135 | #2,986 | 9 |
| 1920 | #680 | 114 | — | |
| 1919 | #695 | 102 | #3,115 | 8 |
| 1918 | #661 | 115 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #657 | 107 | — | |
| 1916 | #667 | 104 | — | |
| 1915 | #747 | 79 | — | |
| 1914 | #726 | 62 | — | |
| 1913 | #748 | 49 | — | |
| 1912 | #704 | 51 | — | |
| 1911 | #624 | 47 | — | |
| 1910 | #663 | 41 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #614 | 40 | — | |
| 1908 | #678 | 32 | — | |
| 1907 | #545 | 44 | — | |
| 1906 | #570 | 38 | — | |
| 1905 | #476 | 51 | — | |
| 1904 | #463 | 50 | — | |
| 1903 | #527 | 37 | — | |
| 1902 | #400 | 60 | — | |
| 1901 | #441 | 45 | — | |
| 1900 | #499 | 46 | — | |
| 1899 | #443 | 43 | — | |
| 1898 | #401 | 59 | — | |
| 1897 | #432 | 46 | — | |
| 1896 | #499 | 35 | — | |
| 1895 | #426 | 44 | — | |
| 1894 | #414 | 45 | — | |
| 1893 | #439 | 36 | — | |
| 1892 | #371 | 52 | — | |
| 1891 | #362 | 47 | — | |
| 1890 | #354 | 52 | — | |
| 1889 | #362 | 44 | — | |
| 1888 | #349 | 46 | — | |
| 1887 | #332 | 41 | — | |
| 1886 | #387 | 31 | — | |
| 1885 | #306 | 43 | — | |
| 1884 | #337 | 34 | — | |
| 1883 | #324 | 30 | — | |
| 1882 | #336 | 28 | — | |
| 1881 | #325 | 24 | — | |
| 1880 | #388 | 18 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Dona was already there! It came in at #388, and was given to 18 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2011, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Dona is popular in 1912
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#265 · 1 in 1,683
- Kentucky#280 · 1 in 1,947
- Missouri#327 · 1 in 2,539
Best ever in a state: #50 in Wyoming, 1932.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #265 | 6 | 1 in 1,683 |
| Kentucky | #280 | 7 | 1 in 1,947 |
| Missouri | #327 | 6 | 1 in 2,539 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dona
- 1,465 spots since 2024 (#13,477 → #14,942)
- Biggest jump: 80 spots in 1916 (#747 → #667)
- Biggest drop: 159 spots in 1971 (#880 → #1,039)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1933 at #301 (411 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 32 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 91 yrs · run 1880–1970
- Highest: 1 in 2,452 girls born in 1933 were named Dona (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.7% of all girls named Dona (3,910) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 339 | #306 (1885) | #345 |
| 1890s | 459 | #354 (1890) | #414 |
| 1900s | 443 | #400 (1902) | #521 |
| 1910s | 757 | #624 (1911) | #689 |
| 1920s | 2,390 | #340 (1929) | #486 |
| 1930s | 3,418 | #301 (1933) | #352 |
| 1940s | 3,420 | #361 (1943) | #400 |
| 1950s | 3,910 | #391 (1954) | #455 |
| 1960s | 2,247 | #555 (1960) | #684 |
| 1970s | 792 | #880 (1970) | #1,511 |
| 1980s | 323 | #1,904 (1980) | #2,988 |
| 1990s | 187 | #3,714 (1990) | #5,517 |
| 2000s | 97 | #6,619 (2001) | #10,789 |
| 2010s | 57 | #8,701 (2010) | #10,802 |
| 2020s | 18 | #12,197 (2023) | #13,539 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dona in 1912
Top girls' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 10,944 of them was named Dona, which outranked 79.6% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).