Dyamond
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462 · Last seen for boys in 1998 at #9,631
Given to girls 99.2% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 94 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,207since 1985
Dyamond over time
Rank among girls' names. Dyamond has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | — | |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | — | |
| 2013 | #7,748 | 15 | — | |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | — | |
| 2011 | #7,436 | 16 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,108 | 27 | — | |
| 2009 | #5,891 | 23 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,013 | 29 | — | |
| 2007 | #4,213 | 36 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,224 | 51 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,902 | 56 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,601 | 29 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,413 | 68 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,709 | 56 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,833 | 96 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,776 | 98 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,719 | 94 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,307 | 61 | #9,631 | 5 |
| 1997 | #2,450 | 53 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,177 | 62 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,650 | 46 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,255 | 58 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,725 | 44 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #3,343 | 33 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,722 | 28 | — | |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | — | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Dyamond! It came in at #10,677, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1987, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Dyamond is popular in 2001
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#370 · 1 in 1,658
- Maryland#765 · 1 in 4,804
- Ohio#816 · 1 in 6,619
- Michigan#1,034 · 1 in 8,320
- New Jersey#1,073 · 1 in 8,280
Best ever in a state: #370 in Mississippi, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #370 | 7 | 1 in 1,658 |
| Maryland | #765 | 5 | 1 in 4,804 |
| Ohio | #816 | 9 | 1 in 6,619 |
| Michigan | #1,034 | 6 | 1 in 8,320 |
| New Jersey | #1,073 | 5 | 1 in 8,280 |
| Georgia | #1,321 | 5 | 1 in 9,647 |
| Florida | #1,356 | 7 | 1 in 11,048 |
| Texas | #1,799 | 9 | 1 in 17,024 |
| California | #2,882 | 6 | 1 in 37,046 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dyamond
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Debuted 1985
- Peaked 1999 at #1,719 (94 births)
- Births halved by 2004, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 18,531 girls born in 2000 were named Dyamond (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,430 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,719 in 1999, was only 1 in 18,870 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 44.9% of all girls named Dyamond (542) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30 | #6,955 (1989) | #9,162 |
| 1990s | 496 | #1,719 (1999) | #2,863 |
| 2000s | 542 | #1,776 (2000) | #3,458 |
| 2010s | 121 | #5,108 (2010) | #9,850 |
| 2020s | 18 | #12,142 (2020) | #13,618 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dyamond in 2001
Top girls' names in 2001
More about 2001
girls
1,800,624 girls got a published name in 2001; 1 in 18,757 of them was named Dyamond, which outranked 89.8% of the 17,978 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,819Mona97
- #1,819Samya97
- #1,819Soleil97
- #1,833Dyamond96
- #1,833Adelina96
- #1,833Arabella96
- #1,833Caylin96
- #1,851Amethyst95
- #1,851Dani95
- #1,851Ida95
Tied with 17 names at #1,833; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.