Earl
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #11,798 · #2,230 for boys in 2025, 63 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1894 · 896 births
- Debut · boys
- 335 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 75 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 289,174since 1880
Earl over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,230 | 63 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,156 | 68 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,244 | 63 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,965 | 78 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,667 | 99 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,069 | 68 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,658 | 97 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,648 | 98 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,478 | 114 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,522 | 110 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,353 | 129 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,526 | 105 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,578 | 98 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,367 | 123 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,429 | 115 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,438 | 115 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,257 | 140 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,090 | 170 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,080 | 170 | |
| 2006 | — | #985 | 188 | |
| 2005 | — | #953 | 183 | |
| 2004 | — | #945 | 178 | |
| 2003 | — | #867 | 199 | |
| 2002 | — | #826 | 202 | |
| 2001 | — | #749 | 231 | |
| 2000 | — | #712 | 245 | |
| 1999 | — | #643 | 271 | |
| 1998 | — | #600 | 309 | |
| 1997 | — | #622 | 278 | |
| 1996 | — | #570 | 319 | |
| 1995 | — | #570 | 321 | |
| 1994 | — | #518 | 381 | |
| 1993 | — | #470 | 447 | |
| 1992 | — | #458 | 474 | |
| 1991 | — | #420 | 539 | |
| 1990 | — | #407 | 569 | |
| 1989 | — | #371 | 603 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #338 | 635 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #332 | 622 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #311 | 651 |
| 1985 | — | #294 | 690 | |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #266 | 781 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #270 | 768 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #251 | 883 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #254 | 863 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #250 | 901 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | #245 | 893 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #227 | 926 |
| 1977 | #5,888 | 10 | #221 | 1,002 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #220 | 941 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #212 | 1,024 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #206 | 1,078 |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | #195 | 1,157 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | #188 | 1,251 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #178 | 1,502 |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | #173 | 1,630 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | #172 | 1,620 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #164 | 1,652 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #163 | 1,653 |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | #160 | 1,752 |
| 1965 | #3,549 | 13 | #156 | 1,949 |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | #149 | 2,196 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #154 | 2,159 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | #147 | 2,304 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #139 | 2,519 |
| 1960 | #3,095 | 16 | #139 | 2,565 |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #135 | 2,687 |
| 1958 | #2,755 | 18 | #130 | 2,800 |
| 1957 | #2,926 | 16 | #122 | 3,139 |
| 1956 | #2,929 | 16 | #110 | 3,304 |
| 1955 | #2,635 | 18 | #106 | 3,246 |
| 1954 | #2,295 | 22 | #98 | 3,424 |
| 1953 | #2,363 | 20 | #96 | 3,437 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #98 | 3,456 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #95 | 3,571 |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | #92 | 3,589 |
| 1949 | #2,514 | 16 | #91 | 3,652 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #83 | 3,977 |
| 1947 | #2,200 | 20 | #83 | 4,242 |
| 1946 | #2,392 | 16 | #82 | 3,830 |
| 1945 | #1,660 | 25 | #71 | 3,567 |
| 1944 | #1,609 | 26 | #65 | 3,874 |
| 1943 | #1,591 | 28 | #60 | 4,186 |
| 1942 | #1,413 | 33 | #62 | 4,050 |
| 1941 | #1,418 | 30 | #58 | 3,806 |
| 1940 | #1,635 | 23 | #52 | 3,944 |
| 1939 | #1,474 | 26 | #50 | 3,896 |
| 1938 | #1,437 | 27 | #50 | 4,007 |
| 1937 | #1,539 | 24 | #48 | 3,942 |
| 1936 | #1,321 | 30 | #47 | 4,106 |
| 1935 | #1,018 | 46 | #46 | 4,224 |
| 1934 | #1,035 | 45 | #41 | 4,628 |
| 1933 | #1,244 | 33 | #41 | 4,374 |
| 1932 | #1,097 | 42 | #41 | 4,822 |
| 1931 | #931 | 55 | #40 | 5,047 |
| 1930 | #831 | 73 | #38 | 5,567 |
| 1929 | #876 | 66 | #36 | 5,737 |
| 1928 | #862 | 71 | #37 | 5,966 |
| 1927 | #1,035 | 55 | #33 | 6,406 |
| 1926 | #990 | 57 | #32 | 6,441 |
| 1925 | #923 | 65 | #31 | 6,436 |
| 1924 | #1,031 | 56 | #33 | 6,529 |
| 1923 | #1,350 | 34 | #31 | 6,339 |
| 1922 | #1,044 | 52 | #31 | 6,461 |
| 1921 | #1,168 | 43 | #31 | 6,754 |
| 1920 | #1,030 | 52 | #31 | 6,533 |
| 1919 | #1,155 | 41 | #31 | 5,975 |
| 1918 | #1,126 | 43 | #31 | 6,321 |
| 1917 | #1,040 | 46 | #32 | 5,632 |
| 1916 | #1,332 | 30 | #32 | 5,553 |
| 1915 | #1,367 | 27 | #33 | 4,908 |
| 1914 | #1,034 | 33 | #33 | 3,842 |
| 1913 | #1,151 | 23 | #31 | 3,110 |
| 1912 | #1,143 | 21 | #34 | 2,518 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | #34 | 1,305 |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 | #33 | 1,109 |
| 1909 | #909 | 20 | #31 | 1,007 |
| 1908 | #1,084 | 14 | #32 | 999 |
| 1907 | #945 | 16 | #28 | 1,006 |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 | #29 | 912 |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | #29 | 904 |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | #29 | 854 |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | #27 | 837 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #27 | 877 |
| 1901 | #881 | 14 | #23 | 818 |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | #28 | 1,037 |
| 1899 | #1,394 | 6 | #23 | 821 |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 | #25 | 883 |
| 1897 | #982 | 11 | #24 | 829 |
| 1896 | #903 | 13 | #21 | 892 |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | #22 | 851 |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | #20 | 896 |
| 1893 | #865 | 12 | #21 | 819 |
| 1892 | #796 | 14 | #21 | 888 |
| 1891 | #893 | 10 | #25 | 674 |
| 1890 | — | #24 | 744 | |
| 1889 | — | #28 | 688 | |
| 1888 | — | #29 | 675 | |
| 1887 | — | #32 | 537 | |
| 1886 | #828 | 8 | #31 | 570 |
| 1885 | — | #36 | 481 | |
| 1884 | — | #40 | 464 | |
| 1883 | — | #42 | 389 | |
| 1882 | — | #49 | 377 | |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | #48 | 314 |
| 1880 | — | #52 | 335 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Earl was already there! It came in at #52, and was given to 335 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2022–2025, when fewer than 79 boys a year got the name.
Where Earl is popular in 1902
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Earl
- 74 spots since 2024 (#2,156 → #2,230)
- 161 spots since 2020 (#2,069 → #2,230)
- 877 spots since 2015 (#1,353 → #2,230)
- Biggest jump: 22 spots in 1998 (#622 → #600)
- Biggest drop: 95 spots in 2007 (#985 → #1,080)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1894 at #20 (896 births)
- Births halved by 1993, 99 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 75 yrs · run 1880–1954
- Top 1,000: 127 yrs · run 1880–2006
- Highest: 1 in 129 boys born in 1894 were named Earl (0.77%)
- Latest: 1 in 27,112 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 22.0% of all boys named Earl (63,602) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,830 | #28 (1889) | #39 |
| 1890s | 8,297 | #20 (1894) | #23 |
| 1900s | 9,251 | #23 (1901) | #28 |
| 1910s | 40,273 | #31 (1918) | #32 |
| 1920s | 63,602 | #31 (1921) | #33 |
| 1930s | 44,613 | #38 (1930) | #44 |
| 1940s | 39,128 | #52 (1940) | #71 |
| 1950s | 32,653 | #92 (1950) | #108 |
| 1960s | 20,369 | #139 (1960) | #154 |
| 1970s | 11,404 | #173 (1970) | #207 |
| 1980s | 7,397 | #250 (1980) | #294 |
| 1990s | 3,908 | #407 (1990) | #528 |
| 2000s | 1,906 | #712 (2000) | #946 |
| 2010s | 1,104 | #1,353 (2015) | #1,500 |
| 2020s | 439 | #1,667 (2021) | #2,055 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Earl in 1902
Top girls' names in 1902
Top boys' names in 1902
More about 1902
girls
264,073 girls got a published name in 1902; 1 in 24,007 of them was named Earl, which outranked 47.4% of the 2,042 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,024Vonnie12
- #1,024Walter12
- #1,024Wilhelmine12
- #1,075Earl11
- #1,075Agness11
- #1,075Albertina11
- #1,075Arvella11
- #1,133Adrienne10
- #1,133Afton10
- #1,133Alexandra10
Tied with 57 names at #1,075; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
122,660 boys got a published name in 1902; 1 in 140 of them was named Earl, which outranked 98.0% of the 1,320 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.