Earl
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #11,798 · #2,230 for boys in 2025, 63 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1894 · 896 births
- Debut · boys
- 335 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 75 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 289,174since 1880
Earl over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,230 | 63 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,156 | 68 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,244 | 63 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,965 | 78 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,667 | 99 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,069 | 68 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,658 | 97 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,648 | 98 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,478 | 114 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,522 | 110 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,353 | 129 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,526 | 105 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,578 | 98 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,367 | 123 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,429 | 115 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,438 | 115 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,257 | 140 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,090 | 170 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,080 | 170 | |
| 2006 | — | #985 | 188 | |
| 2005 | — | #953 | 183 | |
| 2004 | — | #945 | 178 | |
| 2003 | — | #867 | 199 | |
| 2002 | — | #826 | 202 | |
| 2001 | — | #749 | 231 | |
| 2000 | — | #712 | 245 | |
| 1999 | — | #643 | 271 | |
| 1998 | — | #600 | 309 | |
| 1997 | — | #622 | 278 | |
| 1996 | — | #570 | 319 | |
| 1995 | — | #570 | 321 | |
| 1994 | — | #518 | 381 | |
| 1993 | — | #470 | 447 | |
| 1992 | — | #458 | 474 | |
| 1991 | — | #420 | 539 | |
| 1990 | — | #407 | 569 | |
| 1989 | — | #371 | 603 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #338 | 635 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #332 | 622 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #311 | 651 |
| 1985 | — | #294 | 690 | |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #266 | 781 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #270 | 768 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #251 | 883 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #254 | 863 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #250 | 901 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | #245 | 893 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #227 | 926 |
| 1977 | #5,888 | 10 | #221 | 1,002 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #220 | 941 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #212 | 1,024 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #206 | 1,078 |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | #195 | 1,157 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | #188 | 1,251 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #178 | 1,502 |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | #173 | 1,630 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | #172 | 1,620 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #164 | 1,652 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #163 | 1,653 |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | #160 | 1,752 |
| 1965 | #3,549 | 13 | #156 | 1,949 |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | #149 | 2,196 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #154 | 2,159 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | #147 | 2,304 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #139 | 2,519 |
| 1960 | #3,095 | 16 | #139 | 2,565 |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #135 | 2,687 |
| 1958 | #2,755 | 18 | #130 | 2,800 |
| 1957 | #2,926 | 16 | #122 | 3,139 |
| 1956 | #2,929 | 16 | #110 | 3,304 |
| 1955 | #2,635 | 18 | #106 | 3,246 |
| 1954 | #2,295 | 22 | #98 | 3,424 |
| 1953 | #2,363 | 20 | #96 | 3,437 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #98 | 3,456 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #95 | 3,571 |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | #92 | 3,589 |
| 1949 | #2,514 | 16 | #91 | 3,652 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #83 | 3,977 |
| 1947 | #2,200 | 20 | #83 | 4,242 |
| 1946 | #2,392 | 16 | #82 | 3,830 |
| 1945 | #1,660 | 25 | #71 | 3,567 |
| 1944 | #1,609 | 26 | #65 | 3,874 |
| 1943 | #1,591 | 28 | #60 | 4,186 |
| 1942 | #1,413 | 33 | #62 | 4,050 |
| 1941 | #1,418 | 30 | #58 | 3,806 |
| 1940 | #1,635 | 23 | #52 | 3,944 |
| 1939 | #1,474 | 26 | #50 | 3,896 |
| 1938 | #1,437 | 27 | #50 | 4,007 |
| 1937 | #1,539 | 24 | #48 | 3,942 |
| 1936 | #1,321 | 30 | #47 | 4,106 |
| 1935 | #1,018 | 46 | #46 | 4,224 |
| 1934 | #1,035 | 45 | #41 | 4,628 |
| 1933 | #1,244 | 33 | #41 | 4,374 |
| 1932 | #1,097 | 42 | #41 | 4,822 |
| 1931 | #931 | 55 | #40 | 5,047 |
| 1930 | #831 | 73 | #38 | 5,567 |
| 1929 | #876 | 66 | #36 | 5,737 |
| 1928 | #862 | 71 | #37 | 5,966 |
| 1927 | #1,035 | 55 | #33 | 6,406 |
| 1926 | #990 | 57 | #32 | 6,441 |
| 1925 | #923 | 65 | #31 | 6,436 |
| 1924 | #1,031 | 56 | #33 | 6,529 |
| 1923 | #1,350 | 34 | #31 | 6,339 |
| 1922 | #1,044 | 52 | #31 | 6,461 |
| 1921 | #1,168 | 43 | #31 | 6,754 |
| 1920 | #1,030 | 52 | #31 | 6,533 |
| 1919 | #1,155 | 41 | #31 | 5,975 |
| 1918 | #1,126 | 43 | #31 | 6,321 |
| 1917 | #1,040 | 46 | #32 | 5,632 |
| 1916 | #1,332 | 30 | #32 | 5,553 |
| 1915 | #1,367 | 27 | #33 | 4,908 |
| 1914 | #1,034 | 33 | #33 | 3,842 |
| 1913 | #1,151 | 23 | #31 | 3,110 |
| 1912 | #1,143 | 21 | #34 | 2,518 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | #34 | 1,305 |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 | #33 | 1,109 |
| 1909 | #909 | 20 | #31 | 1,007 |
| 1908 | #1,084 | 14 | #32 | 999 |
| 1907 | #945 | 16 | #28 | 1,006 |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 | #29 | 912 |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | #29 | 904 |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | #29 | 854 |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | #27 | 837 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #27 | 877 |
| 1901 | #881 | 14 | #23 | 818 |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | #28 | 1,037 |
| 1899 | #1,394 | 6 | #23 | 821 |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 | #25 | 883 |
| 1897 | #982 | 11 | #24 | 829 |
| 1896 | #903 | 13 | #21 | 892 |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | #22 | 851 |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | #20 | 896 |
| 1893 | #865 | 12 | #21 | 819 |
| 1892 | #796 | 14 | #21 | 888 |
| 1891 | #893 | 10 | #25 | 674 |
| 1890 | — | #24 | 744 | |
| 1889 | — | #28 | 688 | |
| 1888 | — | #29 | 675 | |
| 1887 | — | #32 | 537 | |
| 1886 | #828 | 8 | #31 | 570 |
| 1885 | — | #36 | 481 | |
| 1884 | — | #40 | 464 | |
| 1883 | — | #42 | 389 | |
| 1882 | — | #49 | 377 | |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | #48 | 314 |
| 1880 | — | #52 | 335 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Earl was already there! It came in at #52, and was given to 335 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2022–2025, when fewer than 79 boys a year got the name.
Where Earl is popular in 1925
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Idaho#11 · 1 in 74
- Kentucky#13 · 1 in 94
- Vermont#21 · 1 in 86
- Oregon#22 · 1 in 101
- Maryland#22 · 1 in 104
Best ever in a state: #10 in Idaho, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #11 | 47 | 1 in 74 |
| Kentucky | #13 | 275 | 1 in 94 |
| Vermont | #21 | 29 | 1 in 86 |
| Louisiana | #22 | 164 | 1 in 118 |
| Maryland | #22 | 128 | 1 in 104 |
| Oregon | #22 | 59 | 1 in 101 |
| Wisconsin | #23 | 209 | 1 in 114 |
| Tennessee | #24 | 200 | 1 in 122 |
| Utah | #25 | 45 | 1 in 113 |
| Virginia | #25 | 181 | 1 in 129 |
| Arkansas | #26 | 132 | 1 in 137 |
| Indiana | #26 | 186 | 1 in 138 |
| West Virginia | #26 | 163 | 1 in 108 |
| Wyoming | #26 | 13 | 1 in 129 |
| Missouri | #27 | 231 | 1 in 128 |
| Ohio | #27 | 412 | 1 in 129 |
| Minnesota | #28 | 169 | 1 in 127 |
| South Dakota | #28 | 50 | 1 in 117 |
| Iowa | #29 | 142 | 1 in 145 |
| Michigan | #31 | 270 | 1 in 146 |
| Mississippi | #31 | 111 | 1 in 172 |
| Nebraska | #31 | 81 | 1 in 146 |
| North Dakota | #31 | 50 | 1 in 123 |
| Oklahoma | #31 | 159 | 1 in 144 |
| Florida | #32 | 89 | 1 in 148 |
| Illinois | #32 | 382 | 1 in 155 |
| Kansas | #33 | 116 | 1 in 136 |
| Delaware | #35 | 10 | 1 in 147 |
| New Hampshire | #35 | 27 | 1 in 122 |
| North Carolina | #35 | 195 | 1 in 175 |
| Pennsylvania | #35 | 545 | 1 in 162 |
| Texas | #35 | 288 | 1 in 192 |
| Washington | #35 | 65 | 1 in 151 |
| District of Columbia | #36 | 22 | 1 in 155 |
| Montana | #37 | 24 | 1 in 167 |
| California | #40 | 171 | 1 in 214 |
| Rhode Island | #40 | 33 | 1 in 163 |
| Maine | #41 | 41 | 1 in 157 |
| Alabama | #42 | 118 | 1 in 225 |
| South Carolina | #45 | 84 | 1 in 229 |
| Georgia | #46 | 112 | 1 in 253 |
| Colorado | #50 | 42 | 1 in 206 |
| Massachusetts | #52 | 130 | 1 in 263 |
| Connecticut | #59 | 40 | 1 in 304 |
| New Jersey | #60 | 88 | 1 in 338 |
| New York | #68 | 275 | 1 in 348 |
| Arizona | #76 | 13 | 1 in 290 |
| Hawaii | #115 | 7 | 1 in 458 |
| New Mexico | #119 | 8 | 1 in 487 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Earl
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 74 spots since 2024 (#2,156 → #2,230)
- 161 spots since 2020 (#2,069 → #2,230)
- 877 spots since 2015 (#1,353 → #2,230)
- Biggest jump: 22 spots in 1998 (#622 → #600)
- Biggest drop: 95 spots in 2007 (#985 → #1,080)
Rise & fade · boys
14 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1894 at #20 (896 births)
- Births halved by 1993, 99 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 75 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 75 yrs · run 1880–1954
- Top 1,000: 127 yrs · run 1880–2006
Share of babies · boys
1 in 129
- Highest: 1 in 129 boys born in 1894 were named Earl (0.77%)
- Latest: 1 in 27,112 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 22.0% of all boys named Earl (63,602) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,830 | #28 (1889) | #39 |
| 1890s | 8,297 | #20 (1894) | #23 |
| 1900s | 9,251 | #23 (1901) | #28 |
| 1910s | 40,273 | #31 (1918) | #32 |
| 1920s | 63,602 | #31 (1921) | #33 |
| 1930s | 44,613 | #38 (1930) | #44 |
| 1940s | 39,128 | #52 (1940) | #71 |
| 1950s | 32,653 | #92 (1950) | #108 |
| 1960s | 20,369 | #139 (1960) | #154 |
| 1970s | 11,404 | #173 (1970) | #207 |
| 1980s | 7,397 | #250 (1980) | #294 |
| 1990s | 3,908 | #407 (1990) | #528 |
| 2000s | 1,906 | #712 (2000) | #946 |
| 2010s | 1,104 | #1,353 (2015) | #1,500 |
| 2020s | 439 | #1,667 (2021) | #2,055 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Earl in 1925
girls
#923
65 births · 1 in 18,729 girls
boys
#31
6,436 births · 1 in 173 boys
Top girls' names in 1925
Top boys' names in 1925
More about 1925
girls
1,217,384 girls got a published name in 1925; 1 in 18,729 of them was named Earl, which outranked 84.0% of the 5,771 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,115,919 boys got a published name in 1925; 1 in 173 of them was named Earl, which outranked 99.4% of the 4,867 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Earl
Biggest movers since 1924
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.