Earlene

Last seen for girls in 2007 at #17,636 · Last seen for boys in 1931 at #3,763
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1938 · 388 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
14,165
since 1901

Earlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Earlene has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201965peak #314, 1938girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007#17,6365—
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999#12,6886—
1998#12,4266—
1997#9,0179—
1996#13,5185—
1995#6,64113—
1994#11,7786—
1993#9,5598—
1992#8,7349—
1991#7,43011—
1990#7,88010—
1989#4,12123—
1988#6,66611—
1987#3,74323—
1986#5,18814—
1985#4,86015—
1984#3,52723—
1983#3,34024—
1982#3,64722—
1981#3,43624—
1980#4,32717—
1979#4,05218—
1978#2,94227—
1977#3,26723—
1976#2,60230—
1975#2,56530—
1974#1,96143—
1973#2,09438—
1972#1,98940—
1971#1,68654—
1970#1,59959—
1969#1,21484—
1968#1,43562—
1967#1,25573—
1966#991106—
1965#1,013106—
1964#997115—
1963#912133—
1962#879143—
1961#918138—
1960#755183—
1959#762178—
1958#719188—
1957#662220—
1956#625236—
1955#555265—
1954#537273—
1953#491313—
1952#517265—
1951#447341—
1950#438336—
1949#424344—
1948#401396—
1947#401407—
1946#413349—
1945#381342—
1944#374356—
1943#359399—
1942#358383—
1941#351352—
1940#335361—
1939#349336—
1938#314388—
1937#353333—
1936#341335—
1935#351334—
1934#338348—
1933#345327—
1932#388283—
1931#372298#3,7635
1930#400282—
1929#394294—
1928#397285—
1927#425263—
1926#451225—
1925#464220—
1924#478212—
1923#524181—
1922#539172—
1921#576156—
1920#609136—
1919#689103—
1918#666114—
1917#72992—
1916#75082—
1915#78071—
1914#80252—
1913#1,15123—
1912#84635—
1911#85325—
1910#1,11016—
1909#1,4719—
1908#1,5478—
1907#1,20611—
1906#1,4168—
1905#1,23810—
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901#1,6795—
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1901

The first year at least five girls were named Earlene! It came in at #1,679, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1901–1904, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Earlene is popular in 1965

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMINew York: #1,266 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 25,620 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedINOhio: #914 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 17,607 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,075 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 16,168 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNEMissouri: #572 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,285 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedARTennessee: #557 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,401 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #671 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,685 girlsLAMississippi: #448 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,466 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedHITexas: #957 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 11,989 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Earlene, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#448 · 1 in 3,466
  2. Tennessee#557 · 1 in 6,401
  3. Missouri#572 · 1 in 7,285
  4. Louisiana#671 · 1 in 6,685
  5. Ohio#914 · 1 in 17,607

Best ever in a state: #124 in Arkansas, 1936.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#44861 in 3,466
Tennessee#55751 in 6,401
Missouri#57251 in 7,285
Louisiana#67151 in 6,685
Ohio#91451 in 17,607
Texas#95781 in 11,989
California#1,075101 in 16,168
New York#1,26661 in 25,620
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Earlene
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2007
  • Biggest jump: 349 spots in 1914 (#1,151 → #802)
  • Biggest drop: 305 spots in 1913 (#846 → #1,151)
Rise & fade · girls
37 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1901
  • Peaked 1938 at #314 (388 births)
  • Births halved by 1958, 20 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 54 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 54 yrs · run 1914–1964
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,844
  • Highest: 1 in 2,844 girls born in 1938 were named Earlene (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 384,523 girls born in 2007 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 26.0% of all girls named Earlene (3,689) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s51#1,206 (1907)#1,426
1910s613#666 (1918)#838
1920s2,144#394 (1929)#486
1930s3,264#314 (1938)#355
1940s3,689#335 (1940)#380
1950s2,615#438 (1950)#575
1960s1,143#755 (1960)#1,037
1970s362#1,599 (1970)#2,476
1980s196#3,340 (1983)#4,286
1990s83#6,641 (1995)#9,967
2000s5#17,636 (2007)#17,636

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Earlene in 1965

girls
#1,013
106 births · 1 in 16,652 girls

Top girls' names in 1965

  1. #1Lisa60,271
  2. #2Mary34,270
  3. #3Karen32,869
  4. #4Kimberly28,836
  5. #5Susan26,321
  6. #6Patricia23,552
  7. #7Donna19,700
  8. #8Linda19,345
  9. #9Cynthia19,239
  10. #10Angela18,754
  11. #1,013Earlene106
More about 1965

girls

1,765,164 girls got a published name in 1965; 1 in 16,652 of them was named Earlene, which outranked 86.6% of the 7,535 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Earlene
  1. #1,009Doretha107
  2. #1,009Jeanmarie107
  3. #1,009Lashawn107
  4. #1,013Earlene106
  5. #1,013Anjanette106
  6. #1,013Clarice106
  7. #1,013Estelle106
  8. #1,019Janel105
  9. #1,019Jannie105
  10. #1,019Lidia105

Tied with 5 names at #1,013; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1964
Risers
  1. ↑ 723Marni#1,610 → #887
  2. ↑ 654Dionne#1,281 → #627
  3. ↑ 432Marnie#1,016 → #584
  4. ↑ 426Keli#1,383 → #957
  5. ↑ 368Gia#1,334 → #966
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,326Djuna#738 → #2,064
  2. ↓ 470Djuana#756 → #1,226
  3. ↓ 383Shirl#714 → #1,097
  4. ↓ 297Beverley#955 → #1,252
  5. ↓ 275Dottie#912 → #1,187

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1965 →