Easton
- #5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births
- #110 for boys in 2025, 3,198 births
- Given to boys 98.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2016 · 5,643 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 12 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 79,440since 1907
Easton over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,917 | 20 | #110 | 3,198 |
| 2024 | #4,772 | 28 | #103 | 3,349 |
| 2023 | #4,565 | 30 | #98 | 3,647 |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 | #80 | 4,161 |
| 2021 | #3,069 | 53 | #72 | 4,625 |
| 2020 | #3,607 | 41 | #73 | 4,654 |
| 2019 | #3,085 | 52 | #74 | 4,897 |
| 2018 | #3,158 | 51 | #66 | 5,463 |
| 2017 | #3,145 | 51 | #66 | 5,520 |
| 2016 | #2,798 | 61 | #66 | 5,643 |
| 2015 | #2,501 | 72 | #78 | 5,230 |
| 2014 | #2,648 | 66 | #83 | 4,988 |
| 2013 | #3,005 | 55 | #88 | 4,649 |
| 2012 | #3,169 | 52 | #96 | 3,943 |
| 2011 | #3,603 | 43 | #103 | 3,762 |
| 2010 | #4,023 | 37 | #145 | 2,710 |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | #254 | 1,369 |
| 2008 | #4,882 | 30 | #300 | 1,105 |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #352 | 904 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #357 | 844 |
| 2005 | #6,528 | 18 | #390 | 735 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 | #420 | 619 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #490 | 504 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #540 | 413 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #578 | 355 |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | #580 | 344 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #644 | 269 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #670 | 254 |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | #767 | 194 |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 | #841 | 168 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #921 | 144 |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #1,013 | 120 |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #1,228 | 85 |
| 1992 | — | #1,510 | 59 | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #1,573 | 54 |
| 1990 | — | #1,464 | 59 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,705 | 45 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,367 | 25 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,468 | 22 | |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #1,873 | 32 |
| 1985 | — | #2,504 | 20 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,979 | 27 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,577 | 18 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,966 | 10 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,582 | 7 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,318 | 7 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,864 | 8 | |
| 1930 | — | #4,001 | 5 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #3,505 | 7 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,467 | 7 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,252 | 8 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,869 | 6 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,967 | 9 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,115 | 8 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,392 | 6 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,651 | 7 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1907
The first year at least five boys were named Easton! It came in at #1,345, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1913, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Easton is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- West Virginia#20 · 1 in 134
- Vermont#27 · 1 in 101
- Kentucky#36 · 1 in 207
- Maine#42 · 1 in 160
- North Dakota#53 · 1 in 186
Best ever in a state: #3 in North Dakota, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #20 | 46 | 1 in 134 |
| Vermont | #27 | 12 | 1 in 101 |
| Kentucky | #36 | 99 | 1 in 207 |
| Maine | #42 | 24 | 1 in 160 |
| North Dakota | #53 | 18 | 1 in 186 |
| Mississippi | #54 | 40 | 1 in 271 |
| Oklahoma | #56 | 66 | 1 in 268 |
| Kansas | #59 | 54 | 1 in 260 |
| Idaho | #60 | 32 | 1 in 270 |
| Montana | #62 | 17 | 1 in 221 |
| Missouri | #65 | 90 | 1 in 309 |
| Louisiana | #66 | 63 | 1 in 304 |
| South Dakota | #69 | 16 | 1 in 240 |
| Alabama | #70 | 67 | 1 in 321 |
| Tennessee | #71 | 119 | 1 in 309 |
| Ohio | #72 | 154 | 1 in 341 |
| South Carolina | #72 | 67 | 1 in 316 |
| Wisconsin | #75 | 73 | 1 in 321 |
| Indiana | #79 | 93 | 1 in 340 |
| Delaware | #82 | 12 | 1 in 246 |
| New Hampshire | #84 | 18 | 1 in 250 |
| Alaska | #85 | 9 | 1 in 252 |
| Minnesota | #85 | 70 | 1 in 350 |
| North Carolina | #85 | 143 | 1 in 360 |
| Georgia | #92 | 121 | 1 in 415 |
| Nebraska | #93 | 26 | 1 in 339 |
| Pennsylvania | #97 | 132 | 1 in 396 |
| Rhode Island | #97 | 11 | 1 in 284 |
| Michigan | #98 | 95 | 1 in 423 |
| Virginia | #101 | 84 | 1 in 443 |
| Hawaii | #104 | 9 | 1 in 324 |
| Iowa | #106 | 36 | 1 in 384 |
| Arkansas | #120 | 29 | 1 in 434 |
| Texas | #120 | 328 | 1 in 534 |
| New Mexico | #121 | 16 | 1 in 406 |
| Florida | #127 | 169 | 1 in 565 |
| Colorado | #128 | 55 | 1 in 488 |
| Arizona | #129 | 68 | 1 in 481 |
| Utah | #134 | 39 | 1 in 504 |
| Washington | #143 | 57 | 1 in 575 |
| Maryland | #149 | 39 | 1 in 587 |
| Oregon | #154 | 27 | 1 in 558 |
| Illinois | #162 | 72 | 1 in 688 |
| Connecticut | #165 | 21 | 1 in 629 |
| Nevada | #201 | 15 | 1 in 753 |
| California | #206 | 181 | 1 in 969 |
| Massachusetts | #215 | 28 | 1 in 965 |
| New York | #221 | 89 | 1 in 949 |
| New Jersey | #231 | 41 | 1 in 970 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Easton
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 37 spots since 2020 (#73 → #110)
- Biggest jump: 109 spots in 2010
- Biggest drop: 18 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · boys
109 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1907
- Peaked 2016 at #66 (5,643 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 12 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 12 yrs · run 2012–2023
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1995–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 332
- Highest: 1 in 332 boys born in 2018 were named Easton (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 534 boys born in 2025 (0.19%)
- Its best rank, #66 in 2016, was only 1 in 336 (0.30%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 58.9% of all boys named Easton (46,805) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,345 (1907) | #1,345 |
| 1910s | 41 | #2,543 (1916) | #3,038 |
| 1920s | 37 | #2,967 (1920) | #3,412 |
| 1930s | 36 | #2,864 (1931) | #3,401 |
| 1940s | 27 | #3,010 (1948) | #3,427 |
| 1950s | 6 | #3,505 (1955) | #3,505 |
| 1960s | 18 | #3,318 (1963) | #3,622 |
| 1970s | 25 | #4,054 (1973) | #4,801 |
| 1980s | 208 | #1,705 (1989) | #2,621 |
| 1990s | 1,406 | #644 (1999) | #1,063 |
| 2000s | 7,192 | #254 (2009) | #426 |
| 2010s | 46,805 | #66 (2016) | #87 |
| 2020s | 23,634 | #72 (2021) | #89 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Easton ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: