Eathel
- Last seen for girls in 1953 at #5,040
- Last seen for boys in 1924 at #4,347
- Given to girls 97.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1909 · 22 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 763since 1884
Eathel over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Eathel has never cracked the top 800 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | — | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | — | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,030 | 9 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,572 | 11 | — | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | — | |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,206 | 14 | — | |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,235 | 14 | — | |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,587 | 12 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,768 | 11 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,859 | 11 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,700 | 25 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #2,091 | 18 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,374 | 34 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,952 | 20 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,377 | 29 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,189 | 36 | #3,897 | 5 |
| 1915 | #1,285 | 30 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,665 | 16 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,308 | 19 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,055 | 24 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,071 | 17 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,267 | 13 | — | |
| 1909 | #868 | 22 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,203 | 12 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,037 | 14 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,043 | 13 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 | — | |
| 1902 | #972 | 13 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,319 | 9 | — | |
| 1899 | #906 | 13 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,009 | 12 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,167 | 8 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,292 | 7 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,085 | 8 | — | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1884
The first year at least five girls were named Eathel! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1888, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Eathel is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Eathel in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Eathel
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1953
- Biggest jump: 733 spots in 1905
- Biggest drop: 413 spots in 1900
Rise & fade · girls
25 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1884
- Peaked 1909 at #868 (22 births)
- Births halved by 1926, 17 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 4 yrs · 1899–1909
Share of babies · girls
1 in 15,783
- Highest: 1 in 15,783 girls born in 1909 were named Eathel (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 313,550 girls born in 1953 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
- 31.2% of all girls named Eathel (238) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | #1,024 (1884) | #1,073 |
| 1890s | 63 | #906 (1899) | #1,123 |
| 1900s | 120 | #868 (1909) | #1,168 |
| 1910s | 238 | #1,055 (1912) | #1,330 |
| 1920s | 183 | #1,374 (1921) | #2,262 |
| 1930s | 82 | #2,206 (1935) | #3,155 |
| 1940s | 55 | #2,572 (1940) | #3,712 |
| 1950s | 6 | #5,040 (1953) | #5,040 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Eathel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: