Edgar
- Last seen for girls in 2011 at #16,764
- #486 for boys in 2025, 617 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1881 · 312 births
- Debut · boys
- 283 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 46 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 157,214since 1880
Edgar over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #486 | 617 | |
| 2024 | — | #458 | 682 | |
| 2023 | — | #436 | 714 | |
| 2022 | — | #417 | 775 | |
| 2021 | — | #412 | 758 | |
| 2020 | — | #391 | 789 | |
| 2019 | — | #386 | 812 | |
| 2018 | — | #357 | 925 | |
| 2017 | — | #356 | 940 | |
| 2016 | — | #342 | 1,013 | |
| 2015 | — | #317 | 1,114 | |
| 2014 | — | #302 | 1,180 | |
| 2013 | — | #286 | 1,210 | |
| 2012 | — | #269 | 1,317 | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #243 | 1,468 |
| 2010 | — | #217 | 1,644 | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #201 | 1,908 |
| 2008 | — | #195 | 2,064 | |
| 2007 | — | #168 | 2,420 | |
| 2006 | — | #171 | 2,392 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #168 | 2,454 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | #171 | 2,385 |
| 2003 | — | #172 | 2,320 | |
| 2002 | — | #175 | 2,195 | |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | #160 | 2,376 |
| 2000 | — | #177 | 2,072 | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #173 | 2,036 |
| 1998 | #8,584 | 10 | #167 | 2,047 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #161 | 2,115 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #148 | 2,359 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | #152 | 2,321 |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | #147 | 2,393 |
| 1993 | #4,998 | 19 | #148 | 2,263 |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 | #148 | 2,207 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #142 | 2,267 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 | #143 | 2,207 |
| 1989 | #4,670 | 19 | #147 | 2,106 |
| 1988 | #4,172 | 21 | #173 | 1,616 |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 | #169 | 1,603 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #230 | 1,020 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #257 | 880 |
| 1984 | #4,737 | 15 | #258 | 834 |
| 1983 | #5,824 | 11 | #245 | 896 |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | #262 | 832 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #240 | 933 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #252 | 888 |
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | #262 | 803 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #281 | 689 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #275 | 711 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #283 | 665 |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 | #271 | 717 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #285 | 652 |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #299 | 594 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #291 | 634 |
| 1971 | — | #296 | 674 | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #303 | 666 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #301 | 637 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #308 | 596 |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | #303 | 590 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | #309 | 581 |
| 1965 | — | #308 | 603 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #292 | 721 |
| 1963 | #4,896 | 8 | #305 | 653 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #295 | 693 |
| 1961 | — | #293 | 695 | |
| 1960 | — | #294 | 716 | |
| 1959 | — | #287 | 752 | |
| 1958 | — | #280 | 751 | |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #272 | 773 |
| 1956 | — | #247 | 851 | |
| 1955 | — | #233 | 933 | |
| 1954 | — | #234 | 913 | |
| 1953 | — | #224 | 897 | |
| 1952 | — | #224 | 889 | |
| 1951 | — | #212 | 938 | |
| 1950 | — | #209 | 937 | |
| 1949 | — | #211 | 914 | |
| 1948 | — | #201 | 975 | |
| 1947 | — | #193 | 1,056 | |
| 1946 | — | #193 | 909 | |
| 1945 | — | #180 | 869 | |
| 1944 | — | #172 | 976 | |
| 1943 | — | #168 | 1,082 | |
| 1942 | — | #164 | 1,049 | |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #167 | 989 |
| 1940 | — | #164 | 985 | |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | #158 | 1,008 |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #157 | 1,030 |
| 1937 | — | #145 | 1,068 | |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #143 | 1,068 |
| 1935 | #3,431 | 7 | #138 | 1,145 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #137 | 1,148 |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #135 | 1,183 |
| 1932 | #3,047 | 9 | #135 | 1,307 |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | #122 | 1,377 |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | #119 | 1,526 |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | #116 | 1,487 |
| 1928 | #2,094 | 17 | #114 | 1,600 |
| 1927 | #2,859 | 11 | #107 | 1,723 |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 | #109 | 1,677 |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | #96 | 1,809 |
| 1924 | #2,809 | 12 | #96 | 1,878 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 | #94 | 1,897 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | #93 | 1,923 |
| 1921 | #2,633 | 13 | #90 | 2,014 |
| 1920 | #2,590 | 13 | #89 | 2,029 |
| 1919 | #2,640 | 12 | #89 | 1,986 |
| 1918 | #2,822 | 11 | #89 | 2,085 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #88 | 1,920 |
| 1916 | #2,658 | 11 | #88 | 1,874 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | #85 | 1,895 |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | #87 | 1,361 |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | #87 | 1,087 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #85 | 945 |
| 1911 | — | #83 | 486 | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | #80 | 441 |
| 1909 | — | #86 | 347 | |
| 1908 | — | #76 | 360 | |
| 1907 | — | #81 | 321 | |
| 1906 | — | #79 | 301 | |
| 1905 | — | #78 | 315 | |
| 1904 | — | #80 | 299 | |
| 1903 | — | #81 | 259 | |
| 1902 | — | #76 | 307 | |
| 1901 | — | #71 | 271 | |
| 1900 | — | #71 | 374 | |
| 1899 | — | #80 | 249 | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | #72 | 285 |
| 1897 | — | #69 | 278 | |
| 1896 | — | #68 | 306 | |
| 1895 | — | #64 | 323 | |
| 1894 | — | #64 | 313 | |
| 1893 | — | #63 | 310 | |
| 1892 | — | #67 | 303 | |
| 1891 | — | #64 | 277 | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #61 | 338 |
| 1889 | — | #60 | 322 | |
| 1888 | — | #65 | 321 | |
| 1887 | — | #64 | 266 | |
| 1886 | — | #61 | 309 | |
| 1885 | — | #60 | 303 | |
| 1884 | — | #63 | 290 | |
| 1883 | — | #58 | 292 | |
| 1882 | — | #58 | 308 | |
| 1881 | — | #50 | 312 | |
| 1880 | #836 | 5 | #61 | 283 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Edgar was already there! It came in at #61, and was given to 283 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1899, when fewer than 340 boys a year got the name.
Where Edgar is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- California#248 · 1 in 1,170
- Arizona#250 · 1 in 1,023
- New Mexico#311 · 1 in 1,083
- Texas#337 · 1 in 1,563
- Kansas#352 · 1 in 1,405
Best ever in a state: #28 in Delaware, 1915.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #248 | 150 | 1 in 1,170 |
| Arizona | #250 | 32 | 1 in 1,023 |
| New Mexico | #311 | 6 | 1 in 1,083 |
| Texas | #337 | 112 | 1 in 1,563 |
| Kansas | #352 | 10 | 1 in 1,405 |
| Connecticut | #382 | 7 | 1 in 1,887 |
| Massachusetts | #413 | 12 | 1 in 2,252 |
| Nebraska | #432 | 5 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Washington | #446 | 16 | 1 in 2,050 |
| Colorado | #468 | 12 | 1 in 2,238 |
| Oregon | #474 | 7 | 1 in 2,151 |
| New Jersey | #488 | 15 | 1 in 2,651 |
| Illinois | #513 | 19 | 1 in 2,608 |
| Georgia | #541 | 19 | 1 in 2,643 |
| Oklahoma | #552 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Tennessee | #592 | 12 | 1 in 3,064 |
| Wisconsin | #618 | 7 | 1 in 3,347 |
| Indiana | #621 | 10 | 1 in 3,166 |
| New York | #639 | 23 | 1 in 3,671 |
| South Carolina | #668 | 6 | 1 in 3,533 |
| Virginia | #670 | 10 | 1 in 3,725 |
| North Carolina | #678 | 13 | 1 in 3,959 |
| Florida | #704 | 22 | 1 in 4,342 |
| Kentucky | #708 | 5 | 1 in 4,107 |
| Minnesota | #718 | 6 | 1 in 4,083 |
| Maryland | #809 | 5 | 1 in 4,579 |
| Missouri | #869 | 5 | 1 in 5,562 |
| Michigan | #905 | 7 | 1 in 5,742 |
| Ohio | #940 | 8 | 1 in 6,567 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,004 | 7 | 1 in 7,466 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Edgar
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 95 spots since 2020 (#391 → #486)
- Biggest jump: 61 spots in 1987
- Biggest drop: 29 spots in 2019
Rise & fade · boys
1 yr to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1881 at #50 (312 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 46 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 46 yrs · run 1880–1925
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 323
- Highest: 1 in 323 boys born in 1881 were named Edgar (0.31%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,768 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 14.4% of all boys named Edgar (22,586) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,006 | #50 (1881) | #60 |
| 1890s | 2,982 | #61 (1890) | #67 |
| 1900s | 3,154 | #71 (1900) | #78 |
| 1910s | 14,080 | #80 (1910) | #86 |
| 1920s | 18,037 | #89 (1920) | #100 |
| 1930s | 11,860 | #119 (1930) | #139 |
| 1940s | 9,804 | #164 (1942) | #181 |
| 1950s | 8,634 | #209 (1950) | #242 |
| 1960s | 6,485 | #292 (1964) | #301 |
| 1970s | 6,805 | #262 (1979) | #285 |
| 1980s | 11,608 | #147 (1989) | #223 |
| 1990s | 22,215 | #142 (1991) | #153 |
| 2000s | 22,586 | #160 (2001) | #176 |
| 2010s | 11,623 | #217 (2010) | #308 |
| 2020s | 4,335 | #391 (2020) | #433 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Edgar ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: