Eduardo
Last seen for girls in 2010 at #13,448 · #410 for boys in 2025, 778 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2001 · 3,418 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 110,257since 1890
Eduardo over time
Rank among boys' names. Eduardo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #410 | 778 | |
| 2024 | — | #377 | 869 | |
| 2023 | — | #357 | 921 | |
| 2022 | — | #341 | 981 | |
| 2021 | — | #334 | 975 | |
| 2020 | — | #328 | 1,001 | |
| 2019 | — | #315 | 1,065 | |
| 2018 | — | #316 | 1,071 | |
| 2017 | — | #291 | 1,229 | |
| 2016 | — | #275 | 1,324 | |
| 2015 | — | #251 | 1,448 | |
| 2014 | — | #262 | 1,431 | |
| 2013 | — | #221 | 1,691 | |
| 2012 | — | #205 | 1,860 | |
| 2011 | — | #185 | 2,083 | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #154 | 2,546 |
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #128 | 3,336 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #142 | 2,871 |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #143 | 2,846 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #126 | 3,317 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #129 | 3,180 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #126 | 3,202 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #129 | 3,121 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #133 | 2,957 |
| 2001 | #6,322 | 17 | #112 | 3,418 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #124 | 3,161 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #145 | 2,630 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #145 | 2,487 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #140 | 2,624 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #123 | 3,017 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | #117 | 3,151 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 | #113 | 3,276 |
| 1993 | #4,671 | 21 | #125 | 2,794 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #132 | 2,561 |
| 1991 | #4,497 | 22 | #129 | 2,522 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 | #149 | 2,159 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | #156 | 1,938 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #198 | 1,385 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | #220 | 1,079 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #229 | 1,022 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #223 | 1,051 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #224 | 1,003 |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | #230 | 973 |
| 1982 | #4,945 | 14 | #234 | 996 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #238 | 946 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #227 | 1,050 |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #232 | 967 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #216 | 1,002 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #225 | 960 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #211 | 996 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #243 | 846 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #247 | 811 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #238 | 891 |
| 1972 | — | #273 | 711 | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #281 | 736 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #277 | 759 |
| 1969 | — | #291 | 669 | |
| 1968 | — | #310 | 594 | |
| 1967 | — | #326 | 527 | |
| 1966 | — | #326 | 526 | |
| 1965 | — | #330 | 523 | |
| 1964 | — | #361 | 470 | |
| 1963 | — | #378 | 447 | |
| 1962 | — | #369 | 474 | |
| 1961 | — | #411 | 371 | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #414 | 368 |
| 1959 | — | #449 | 318 | |
| 1958 | — | #444 | 314 | |
| 1957 | — | #482 | 261 | |
| 1956 | — | #494 | 234 | |
| 1955 | — | #473 | 242 | |
| 1954 | — | #516 | 197 | |
| 1953 | — | #527 | 182 | |
| 1952 | — | #532 | 174 | |
| 1951 | — | #519 | 173 | |
| 1950 | — | #555 | 148 | |
| 1949 | — | #569 | 139 | |
| 1948 | — | #602 | 126 | |
| 1947 | — | #647 | 113 | |
| 1946 | — | #581 | 121 | |
| 1945 | — | #624 | 94 | |
| 1944 | — | #651 | 91 | |
| 1943 | — | #673 | 91 | |
| 1942 | — | #812 | 63 | |
| 1941 | — | #708 | 76 | |
| 1940 | — | #770 | 64 | |
| 1939 | — | #715 | 70 | |
| 1938 | — | #710 | 74 | |
| 1937 | — | #675 | 78 | |
| 1936 | — | #679 | 76 | |
| 1935 | — | #693 | 76 | |
| 1934 | — | #623 | 92 | |
| 1933 | — | #762 | 64 | |
| 1932 | — | #677 | 81 | |
| 1931 | — | #624 | 91 | |
| 1930 | — | #610 | 101 | |
| 1929 | — | #620 | 96 | |
| 1928 | — | #533 | 129 | |
| 1927 | — | #702 | 85 | |
| 1926 | — | #737 | 75 | |
| 1925 | — | #786 | 70 | |
| 1924 | — | #778 | 75 | |
| 1923 | — | #711 | 83 | |
| 1922 | — | #648 | 98 | |
| 1921 | — | #913 | 59 | |
| 1920 | — | #929 | 55 | |
| 1919 | — | #927 | 52 | |
| 1918 | — | #986 | 46 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,132 | 35 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,072 | 36 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1914 | — | #967 | 33 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,049 | 23 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #856 | 15 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,193 | 8 | |
| 1909 | — | #840 | 12 | |
| 1908 | — | #825 | 11 | |
| 1907 | — | #930 | 9 | |
| 1906 | — | #927 | 8 | |
| 1905 | — | #1,091 | 6 | |
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | #683 | 10 | |
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #900 | 7 | |
| 1895 | — | #978 | 6 | |
| 1894 | — | #567 | 13 | |
| 1893 | — | #836 | 7 | |
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | #629 | 10 | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Eduardo! It came in at #629, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1891–1892, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Eduardo is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#54 · 1 in 251
- Texas#60 · 1 in 260
- Nevada#71 · 1 in 261
- Arizona#73 · 1 in 296
- New Mexico#79 · 1 in 286
Best ever in a state: #38 in California, 1994.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #54 | 965 | 1 in 251 |
| Texas | #60 | 718 | 1 in 260 |
| Nevada | #71 | 55 | 1 in 261 |
| Arizona | #73 | 135 | 1 in 296 |
| New Mexico | #79 | 37 | 1 in 286 |
| Illinois | #91 | 189 | 1 in 384 |
| Oregon | #106 | 48 | 1 in 402 |
| Colorado | #127 | 59 | 1 in 487 |
| Oklahoma | #130 | 45 | 1 in 477 |
| Florida | #131 | 163 | 1 in 585 |
| Washington | #132 | 70 | 1 in 528 |
| North Carolina | #136 | 89 | 1 in 605 |
| Delaware | #143 | 7 | 1 in 539 |
| Georgia | #154 | 84 | 1 in 703 |
| Kansas | #155 | 29 | 1 in 577 |
| District of Columbia | #159 | 8 | 1 in 531 |
| Connecticut | #173 | 17 | 1 in 900 |
| Arkansas | #175 | 21 | 1 in 715 |
| Idaho | #176 | 14 | 1 in 626 |
| Nebraska | #180 | 16 | 1 in 648 |
| Utah | #182 | 34 | 1 in 676 |
| New York | #187 | 105 | 1 in 1,026 |
| South Carolina | #191 | 25 | 1 in 868 |
| Iowa | #205 | 20 | 1 in 791 |
| Virginia | #206 | 41 | 1 in 1,028 |
| New Jersey | #223 | 36 | 1 in 1,239 |
| Tennessee | #229 | 31 | 1 in 1,172 |
| Massachusetts | #236 | 24 | 1 in 1,294 |
| Indiana | #237 | 32 | 1 in 1,168 |
| Maryland | #279 | 19 | 1 in 1,513 |
| Wisconsin | #279 | 20 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Michigan | #280 | 32 | 1 in 1,542 |
| Louisiana | #295 | 18 | 1 in 1,391 |
| Missouri | #302 | 21 | 1 in 1,593 |
| Kentucky | #315 | 12 | 1 in 1,952 |
| Alabama | #322 | 14 | 1 in 1,726 |
| Minnesota | #338 | 16 | 1 in 1,825 |
| Mississippi | #367 | 8 | 1 in 1,863 |
| Ohio | #377 | 25 | 1 in 2,506 |
| Pennsylvania | #413 | 21 | 1 in 2,958 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eduardo
- 33 spots since 2024 (#377 → #410)
- 82 spots since 2020 (#328 → #410)
- 159 spots since 2015 (#251 → #410)
- Biggest jump: 337 spots in 1911 (#1,193 → #856)
- Biggest drop: 411 spots in 1895 (#567 → #978)
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 2001 at #112 (3,418 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 121 yrs · run 1918–2025
- Highest: 1 in 568 boys born in 2001 were named Eduardo (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,195 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
- 28.5% of all boys named Eduardo (31,409) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 43 | #567 (1894) | #782 |
| 1900s | 67 | #683 (1901) | #869 |
| 1910s | 304 | #856 (1911) | #1,033 |
| 1920s | 825 | #533 (1928) | #736 |
| 1930s | 803 | #610 (1930) | #677 |
| 1940s | 978 | #569 (1949) | #664 |
| 1950s | 2,243 | #444 (1958) | #499 |
| 1960s | 4,969 | #291 (1969) | #352 |
| 1970s | 8,679 | #211 (1976) | #244 |
| 1980s | 11,443 | #156 (1989) | #218 |
| 1990s | 27,221 | #113 (1994) | #132 |
| 2000s | 31,409 | #112 (2001) | #129 |
| 2010s | 15,748 | #154 (2010) | #248 |
| 2020s | 5,525 | #328 (2020) | #358 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eduardo in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 229,639 of them was named Eduardo, which outranked 38.5% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #11,459Zyair9
- #11,459Zynasia9
- #11,459Zyrihanna9
- #12,429Eduardo8
- #12,429Aaleeyah8
- #12,429Aalina8
- #12,429Aamiya8
- #13,704Aadyn7
- #13,704Aahna7
- #13,704Aairah7
Tied with 1,274 names at #12,429; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 595 of them was named Eduardo, which outranked 99.1% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.