Eileen

#654 for girls in 2025, 437 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1943 · 4,092 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
20 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
189,614
since 1882

Eileen over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202014peak #68, 1943girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#654437—
2024#592511—
2023#663444—
2022#621476—
2021#671440—
2020#701401—
2019#701413—
2018#669439—
2017#692421—
2016#727390—
2015#697408—
2014#716391—
2013#752360—
2012#829324—
2011#745369—
2010#837321—
2009#814347—
2008#762386—
2007#734396—
2006#777355—
2005#717381—
2004#737358—
2003#677389—
2002#667380—
2001#619407—
2000#624402—
1999#593414—
1998#552450—
1997#600377—
1996#614373—
1995#603372—
1994#608368—
1993#588401—
1992#579403—
1991#554422—
1990#461529—
1989#466524#6,2297
1988#440515—
1987#464471—
1986#412534—
1985#403560—
1984#373614—
1983#332689—
1982#394584—
1981#386585—
1980#377613—
1979#386570#6,0565
1978#345629—
1977#350630#5,8455
1976#369564—
1975#336662—
1974#308759—
1973#283865—
1972#278918—
1971#2771,036#3,9637
1970#2451,282—
1969#2121,475—
1968#1971,578#3,1078
1967#1801,793#3,2317
1966#1682,039—
1965#1572,418#3,2447
1964#1532,585#2,8549
1963#1412,937#2,41412
1962#1393,057#4,0335
1961#1313,490—
1960#1303,496#2,68510
1959#1263,629#3,2907
1958#1253,526#3,0338
1957#1203,710#2,37512
1956#1233,452#3,5356
1955#1203,503#2,43511
1954#1153,680#3,8275
1953#1083,629#2,9058
1952#1003,742#3,7345
1951#953,816#2,8448
1950#913,883#2,7708
1949#953,722#2,45310
1948#913,838#3,6685
1947#914,251#1,91616
1946#804,168#2,27111
1945#703,637#2,9966
1944#733,649#2,4679
1943#684,092#1,76417
1942#883,108#2,14512
1941#1212,196#2,08312
1940#1252,034#2,32210
1939#1152,158#2,15911
1938#1132,282#3,5345
1937#1072,345#2,4799
1936#1032,320#1,87214
1935#1082,199#2,7198
1934#1092,227#2,9737
1933#1152,004#3,0047
1932#1142,121#2,8498
1931#1062,224#2,10113
1930#1102,378#2,7819
1929#982,558#3,9595
1928#1022,644#3,0768
1927#912,929#3,7806
1926#922,928—
1925#962,964#4,1975
1924#933,070—
1923#952,976—
1922#962,939#4,3075
1921#1002,862#3,8696
1920#1002,718—
1919#1032,346#3,7366
1918#1102,264—
1917#1062,147#3,5456
1916#1181,858—
1915#1321,493—
1914#159920—
1913#184614—
1912#203470—
1911#211336—
1910#240258—
1909#240216—
1908#242199—
1907#266168—
1906#258161—
1905#301124—
1904#294120—
1903#310101—
1902#32491—
1901#32686—
1900#36585—
1899#33977—
1898#34581—
1897#37659—
1896#42446—
1895#42644—
1894#46336—
1893#47332—
1892#46035—
1891#75013—
1890#69315—
1889#56720—
1888#69014—
1887#58615—
1886#57215—
1885#9216—
1884——
1883#9205—
1882#8136—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Eileen! It came in at #813, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Eileen is popular in 2014

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNHWashington: #766 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,925 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #530 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,469 girlsMNIllinois: #551 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,808 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMINew York: #347 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 1,712 girlsNYMassachusetts: #580 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,174 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedORNevada: #455 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,797 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedIAIndiana: #1,027 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,108 girlsINOhio: #1,033 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,618 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,114 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,601 girlsPANew Jersey: #594 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,092 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #432 for girls · 94 births · 1 in 2,230 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedUTColorado: #614 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,905 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNEMissouri: #730 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,873 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWVVirginia: #602 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,110 girlsVAMaryland: #877 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,862 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedDEArizona: #987 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,284 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #882 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,014 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedALGeorgia: #874 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,820 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedHITexas: #607 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 3,147 girlsTXFlorida: #1,014 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 6,441 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New York#347 · 1 in 1,712
  2. California#432 · 1 in 2,230
  3. Nevada#455 · 1 in 1,797
  4. Minnesota#530 · 1 in 2,469
  5. Illinois#551 · 1 in 2,808

Best ever in a state: #19 in New Jersey, 1943.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New York#347541 in 1,712
California#432941 in 2,230
Nevada#45561 in 1,797
Minnesota#530101 in 2,469
Illinois#551211 in 2,808
Massachusetts#58081 in 3,174
New Jersey#594121 in 3,092
Virginia#602121 in 3,110
Texas#607531 in 3,147
Colorado#61481 in 2,905
Missouri#73071 in 3,873
Washington#76681 in 3,925
Georgia#874101 in 4,820
Maryland#87751 in 4,862
North Carolina#88291 in 5,014
Arizona#98761 in 5,284
Florida#1,014131 in 6,441
Indiana#1,02751 in 6,108
Ohio#1,03381 in 6,618
Pennsylvania#1,11471 in 7,601
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Eileen
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 62 spots since 2024 (#592 → #654)
  • 47 spots since 2020 (#701 → #654)
  • 43 spots since 2015 (#697 → #654)
  • Biggest jump: 349 spots in 1886 (#921 → #572)
  • Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1890 (#567 → #693)
Rise & fade · girls
61 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1943 at #68 (4,092 births)
  • Births halved by 1966, 23 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 20 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 20 yrs · run 1942–1952
  • Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1885–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 341
  • Highest: 1 in 341 girls born in 1943 were named Eileen (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,678 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 19.3% of all girls named Eileen (36,570) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s81#567 (1889)#724
1890s438#339 (1899)#475
1900s1,351#240 (1909)#293
1910s12,706#103 (1919)#157
1920s28,588#91 (1927)#96
1930s22,258#103 (1936)#110
1940s34,695#68 (1943)#90
1950s36,570#91 (1950)#112
1960s24,868#130 (1960)#161
1970s7,915#245 (1970)#318
1980s5,689#332 (1983)#405
1990s4,109#461 (1990)#575
2000s3,801#619 (2001)#713
2010s3,836#669 (2018)#737
2020s2,709#592 (2024)#650

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Eileen in 2014

girls
#716
391 births · 1 in 4,569 girls

Top girls' names in 2014

  1. #1Emma20,970
  2. #2Olivia19,840
  3. #3Sophia18,644
  4. #4Isabella17,136
  5. #5Ava15,727
  6. #6Mia13,534
  7. #7Emily12,670
  8. #8Abigail12,114
  9. #9Madison10,333
  10. #10Charlotte10,123
  11. #716Eileen391
More about 2014

girls

1,786,355 girls got a published name in 2014; 1 in 4,569 of them was named Eileen, which outranked 96.3% of the 19,232 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Eileen
  1. #713Kayden394
  2. #714Reyna393
  3. #715Aryana392
  4. #716Eileen391
  5. #716Celine391
  6. #716Teresa391
  7. #719Myah390
  8. #719Simone390
  9. #721Isabela389

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2013
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,632Aranza#4,243 → #611
  2. ↑ 576Montserrat#1,148 → #572
  3. ↑ 573Monserrat#1,165 → #592
  4. ↑ 463Maisie#1,116 → #653
  5. ↑ 419Ariadne#1,220 → #801
Fallers
  1. ↓ 401Miley#386 → #787
  2. ↓ 345Karly#988 → #1,333
  3. ↓ 318Britney#838 → #1,156
  4. ↓ 239Kaya#761 → #1,000
  5. ↓ 235Rihanna#938 → #1,173

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2014 →