Eisley
#2,276 for girls in 2025, 80 births · Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
Given to girls 99.2% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 196 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,361since 2003
Eisley over time
Rank among girls' names. Eisley has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,276 | 80 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,067 | 93 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,762 | 116 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,638 | 129 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,577 | 133 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,571 | 134 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,608 | 132 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,425 | 155 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,224 | 196 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #1,294 | 185 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,258 | 194 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,281 | 187 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,408 | 162 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,566 | 139 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #2,043 | 95 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,313 | 82 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,361 | 49 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,779 | 42 | — | |
| 2007 | #5,377 | 26 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | #5,840 | 10 | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Eisley! It came in at #15,784, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2003–2004, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Eisley is popular in 2014
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nebraska#367 · 1 in 1,334
- Wisconsin#542 · 1 in 2,566
- Kansas#610 · 1 in 2,593
- Indiana#732 · 1 in 3,817
- Minnesota#753 · 1 in 4,115
Best ever in a state: #359 in Iowa, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #367 | 6 | 1 in 1,334 |
| Wisconsin | #542 | 9 | 1 in 2,566 |
| Kansas | #610 | 5 | 1 in 2,593 |
| Indiana | #732 | 8 | 1 in 3,817 |
| Minnesota | #753 | 6 | 1 in 4,115 |
| Ohio | #822 | 11 | 1 in 4,813 |
| Washington | #859 | 7 | 1 in 4,486 |
| Virginia | #908 | 7 | 1 in 5,331 |
| Colorado | #924 | 5 | 1 in 4,648 |
| Texas | #983 | 28 | 1 in 5,956 |
| Tennessee | #1,066 | 5 | 1 in 6,223 |
| Arizona | #1,102 | 5 | 1 in 6,341 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,222 | 6 | 1 in 8,868 |
| Illinois | #1,264 | 7 | 1 in 8,424 |
| Michigan | #1,265 | 5 | 1 in 8,435 |
| California | #1,673 | 15 | 1 in 13,977 |
| Florida | #1,753 | 6 | 1 in 13,955 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eisley
- 209 spots since 2024 (#2,067 → #2,276)
- 705 spots since 2020 (#1,571 → #2,276)
- 1,018 spots since 2015 (#1,258 → #2,276)
- Debuted 2003
- Peaked 2017 at #1,224 (196 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 8,808 girls born in 2017 were named Eisley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,091 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 64.7% of all girls named Eisley (1,527) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149 | #3,361 (2009) | #7,539 |
| 2010s | 1,527 | #1,224 (2017) | #1,542 |
| 2020s | 685 | #1,571 (2020) | #1,815 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eisley in 2014
Top girls' names in 2014
More about 2014
girls
1,786,355 girls got a published name in 2014; 1 in 9,553 of them was named Eisley, which outranked 93.3% of the 19,232 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,275Kenzi188
- #1,275Kiersten188
- #1,275Naima188
- #1,281Eisley187
- #1,281Katarina187
- #1,281Violette187
- #1,284Jacey186
- #1,284Kaila186
- #1,284Paisleigh186
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 3,632Aranza#4,243 → #611
- ↑ 576Montserrat#1,148 → #572
- ↑ 573Monserrat#1,165 → #592
- ↑ 463Maisie#1,116 → #653
- ↑ 419Ariadne#1,220 → #801
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.