Elanor
- #1,631 for girls in 2025, 127 births
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 129 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,930since 1913
Elanor over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Elanor has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,631 | 127 |
| 2024 | #1,779 | 113 |
| 2023 | #1,614 | 129 |
| 2022 | #1,974 | 99 |
| 2021 | #2,103 | 90 |
| 2020 | #2,100 | 87 |
| 2019 | #2,681 | 64 |
| 2018 | #3,050 | 53 |
| 2017 | #3,014 | 54 |
| 2016 | #2,966 | 56 |
| 2015 | #2,846 | 61 |
| 2014 | #4,455 | 32 |
| 2013 | #3,465 | 45 |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 |
| 2011 | #3,603 | 43 |
| 2010 | #4,397 | 33 |
| 2009 | #5,226 | 27 |
| 2008 | #4,268 | 36 |
| 2007 | #3,786 | 42 |
| 2006 | #4,576 | 31 |
| 2005 | #4,581 | 29 |
| 2004 | #4,093 | 34 |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 |
| 2002 | #5,673 | 20 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 |
| 1995 | — | |
| 1994 | — | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 |
| 1991 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 |
| 1988 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 |
| 1985 | — | |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 |
| 1982 | — | |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,892 | 8 |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 |
| 1943 | #4,196 | 6 |
| 1942 | #2,817 | 11 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 |
| 1940 | #2,572 | 11 |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 |
| 1937 | #1,914 | 17 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 |
| 1935 | #2,731 | 10 |
| 1934 | #2,567 | 11 |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 |
| 1926 | #2,076 | 18 |
| 1925 | #2,778 | 12 |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 |
| 1922 | #3,655 | 8 |
| 1921 | #2,941 | 11 |
| 1920 | #1,952 | 20 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 |
| 1917 | #2,100 | 16 |
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
First appearance
1913
The first year at least five girls were named Elanor! It came in at #2,331, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1947–1948, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Elanor is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Idaho#402 · 1 in 1,433
- Missouri#640 · 1 in 3,037
- Washington#679 · 1 in 3,207
- Indiana#815 · 1 in 3,987
- Virginia#1,180 · 1 in 6,748
Best ever in a state: #402 in Idaho, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #402 | 5 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Missouri | #640 | 8 | 1 in 3,037 |
| Washington | #679 | 9 | 1 in 3,207 |
| Indiana | #815 | 7 | 1 in 3,987 |
| Virginia | #1,180 | 5 | 1 in 6,748 |
| Michigan | #1,210 | 5 | 1 in 7,146 |
| Ohio | #1,438 | 5 | 1 in 9,454 |
| Florida | #1,685 | 7 | 1 in 12,395 |
| Texas | #2,210 | 9 | 1 in 17,838 |
| California | #3,095 | 5 | 1 in 32,345 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elanor
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 469 spots since 2020 (#2,100 → #1,631)
Rise & fade · girls
110 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 2023 at #1,614 (129 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 12,439
- Highest: 1 in 12,439 girls born in 2023 were named Elanor (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,656 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 33.4% of all girls named Elanor (645) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 71 | #2,100 (1917) | #2,786 |
| 1920s | 129 | #1,952 (1920) | #2,703 |
| 1930s | 109 | #1,914 (1937) | #2,750 |
| 1940s | 69 | #2,572 (1940) | #3,750 |
| 1950s | 13 | #5,031 (1959) | #5,120 |
| 1960s | 5 | #6,767 (1964) | #6,767 |
| 1970s | 46 | #5,776 (1974) | #7,544 |
| 1980s | 37 | #6,804 (1981) | #8,598 |
| 1990s | 56 | #7,303 (1990) | #10,166 |
| 2000s | 273 | #3,786 (2007) | #5,237 |
| 2010s | 477 | #2,681 (2019) | #3,460 |
| 2020s | 645 | #1,614 (2023) | #1,867 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Elanor ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: