Eleanora
#862 for girls in 2025, 313 births
- Peak · girls
- 1885 · 19 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,322since 1880
Eleanora over time
Rank among girls' names. Eleanora has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #862 | 313 |
| 2024 | #887 | 304 |
| 2023 | #944 | 278 |
| 2022 | #1,026 | 250 |
| 2021 | #1,000 | 256 |
| 2020 | #1,067 | 232 |
| 2019 | #1,103 | 222 |
| 2018 | #1,035 | 249 |
| 2017 | #1,030 | 251 |
| 2016 | #1,149 | 219 |
| 2015 | #1,470 | 156 |
| 2014 | #1,590 | 135 |
| 2013 | #2,020 | 96 |
| 2012 | #2,597 | 69 |
| 2011 | #2,483 | 73 |
| 2010 | #2,976 | 57 |
| 2009 | #4,571 | 32 |
| 2008 | #3,859 | 41 |
| 2007 | #4,213 | 36 |
| 2006 | #4,811 | 29 |
| 2005 | #4,487 | 30 |
| 2004 | #4,949 | 26 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 |
| 1970 | #4,038 | 14 |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 |
| 1963 | #2,780 | 20 |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 |
| 1961 | #2,474 | 24 |
| 1960 | #2,820 | 19 |
| 1959 | #2,517 | 21 |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 |
| 1957 | #2,168 | 26 |
| 1956 | #2,005 | 29 |
| 1955 | #2,725 | 17 |
| 1954 | #2,450 | 20 |
| 1953 | #1,783 | 31 |
| 1952 | #1,746 | 32 |
| 1951 | #1,805 | 29 |
| 1950 | #1,626 | 33 |
| 1949 | #1,469 | 39 |
| 1948 | #2,008 | 23 |
| 1947 | #1,545 | 37 |
| 1946 | #1,559 | 32 |
| 1945 | #1,356 | 35 |
| 1944 | #1,742 | 23 |
| 1943 | #1,275 | 41 |
| 1942 | #1,153 | 47 |
| 1941 | #1,065 | 47 |
| 1940 | #1,404 | 29 |
| 1939 | #974 | 53 |
| 1938 | #931 | 58 |
| 1937 | #910 | 57 |
| 1936 | #876 | 60 |
| 1935 | #849 | 66 |
| 1934 | #815 | 68 |
| 1933 | #782 | 71 |
| 1932 | #775 | 76 |
| 1931 | #758 | 78 |
| 1930 | #669 | 105 |
| 1929 | #695 | 101 |
| 1928 | #666 | 110 |
| 1927 | #659 | 118 |
| 1926 | #637 | 127 |
| 1925 | #644 | 129 |
| 1924 | #604 | 152 |
| 1923 | #654 | 128 |
| 1922 | #631 | 136 |
| 1921 | #557 | 164 |
| 1920 | #590 | 148 |
| 1919 | #556 | 153 |
| 1918 | #538 | 170 |
| 1917 | #605 | 127 |
| 1916 | #486 | 174 |
| 1915 | #499 | 153 |
| 1914 | #497 | 126 |
| 1913 | #544 | 87 |
| 1912 | #673 | 55 |
| 1911 | #558 | 58 |
| 1910 | #564 | 53 |
| 1909 | #559 | 47 |
| 1908 | #535 | 47 |
| 1907 | #702 | 29 |
| 1906 | #562 | 39 |
| 1905 | #528 | 42 |
| 1904 | #511 | 41 |
| 1903 | #558 | 34 |
| 1902 | #518 | 38 |
| 1901 | #659 | 23 |
| 1900 | #524 | 41 |
| 1899 | #550 | 30 |
| 1898 | #544 | 34 |
| 1897 | #509 | 33 |
| 1896 | #514 | 33 |
| 1895 | #622 | 24 |
| 1894 | #527 | 30 |
| 1893 | #487 | 31 |
| 1892 | #526 | 27 |
| 1891 | #624 | 18 |
| 1890 | #578 | 20 |
| 1889 | #532 | 23 |
| 1888 | #612 | 17 |
| 1887 | #633 | 13 |
| 1886 | #606 | 14 |
| 1885 | #484 | 19 |
| 1884 | #556 | 14 |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 |
| 1882 | #560 | 11 |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Eleanora was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1975–1976, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Eleanora is popular in 1926
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#164 · 1 in 1,042
- New Jersey#276 · 1 in 3,387
- Massachusetts#333 · 1 in 5,784
- West Virginia#365 · 1 in 3,326
- Pennsylvania#382 · 1 in 6,100
Best ever in a state: #132 in District of Columbia, 1923.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #164 | 13 | 1 in 1,042 |
| New Jersey | #276 | 9 | 1 in 3,387 |
| Massachusetts | #333 | 6 | 1 in 5,784 |
| West Virginia | #365 | 6 | 1 in 3,326 |
| Pennsylvania | #382 | 15 | 1 in 6,100 |
| New York | #412 | 16 | 1 in 6,160 |
| Illinois | #464 | 9 | 1 in 6,616 |
| Missouri | #484 | 5 | 1 in 6,051 |
| Texas | #855 | 6 | 1 in 9,965 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eleanora
- 25 spots since 2024 (#887 → #862)
- 205 spots since 2020 (#1,067 → #862)
- 608 spots since 2015 (#1,470 → #862)
- Biggest jump: 167 spots in 1908 (#702 → #535)
- Biggest drop: 430 spots in 1940 (#974 → #1,404)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1885 at #484 (19 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 81 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 64 yrs · run 1880–1939
- Highest: 1 in 5,135 girls born in 2025 were named Eleanora (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #484 in 1885, was only 1 in 7,003 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 19.6% of all girls named Eleanora (1,633) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 133 | #484 (1885) | #605 |
| 1890s | 280 | #487 (1893) | #548 |
| 1900s | 381 | #511 (1904) | #566 |
| 1910s | 1,156 | #486 (1916) | #552 |
| 1920s | 1,313 | #557 (1921) | #634 |
| 1930s | 692 | #669 (1930) | #834 |
| 1940s | 353 | #1,065 (1941) | #1,458 |
| 1950s | 261 | #1,626 (1950) | #2,120 |
| 1960s | 142 | #2,474 (1961) | #3,883 |
| 1970s | 63 | #4,038 (1970) | #6,779 |
| 1980s | 57 | #5,912 (1980) | #8,892 |
| 1990s | 82 | #7,532 (1998) | #9,751 |
| 2000s | 249 | #3,859 (2008) | #5,730 |
| 2010s | 1,527 | #1,030 (2017) | #1,745 |
| 2020s | 1,633 | #862 (2025) | #964 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eleanora in 1926
Top girls' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 9,334 of them was named Eleanora, which outranked 88.7% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #631Floy129
- #631Katheryn129
- #631Nan129
- #637Eleanora127
- #637Kitty127
- #639Albertha126
- #639Alpha126
- #639Dorcas126
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.