Eliana
- #10 for girls in 2025, 8,191 births
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 8,191 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 10 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 76,104since 1961
Eliana over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10 | 8,191 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #18 | 6,447 | — | |
| 2023 | #34 | 5,357 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #41 | 4,814 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #47 | 4,460 | — | |
| 2020 | #53 | 4,090 | — | |
| 2019 | #62 | 3,891 | — | |
| 2018 | #84 | 3,405 | — | |
| 2017 | #88 | 3,283 | — | |
| 2016 | #93 | 3,207 | — | |
| 2015 | #102 | 2,992 | #12,086 | 5 |
| 2014 | #117 | 2,744 | — | |
| 2013 | #125 | 2,612 | — | |
| 2012 | #144 | 2,249 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #155 | 2,015 | — | |
| 2010 | #168 | 1,835 | — | |
| 2009 | #193 | 1,699 | — | |
| 2008 | #201 | 1,666 | — | |
| 2007 | #248 | 1,399 | — | |
| 2006 | #278 | 1,203 | — | |
| 2005 | #304 | 1,052 | — | |
| 2004 | #314 | 1,013 | — | |
| 2003 | #347 | 890 | — | |
| 2002 | #393 | 746 | — | |
| 2001 | #493 | 564 | — | |
| 2000 | #537 | 483 | — | |
| 1999 | #624 | 381 | — | |
| 1998 | #708 | 313 | — | |
| 1997 | #780 | 267 | — | |
| 1996 | #885 | 223 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,049 | 171 | — | |
| 1994 | #994 | 186 | — | |
| 1993 | #989 | 187 | — | |
| 1992 | #917 | 213 | — | |
| 1991 | #745 | 279 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,163 | 148 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,118 | 148 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,140 | 134 | — | |
| 1987 | #826 | 211 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #450 | 481 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #2,484 | 39 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,192 | 45 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,552 | 35 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,581 | 36 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,488 | 38 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,342 | 41 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,903 | 19 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,512 | 21 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,612 | 20 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,614 | 13 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,787 | 16 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,311 | 13 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1961
The first year at least five girls were named Eliana! It came in at #6,567, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1961–1962, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Eliana is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#6 · 1 in 82
- Maryland#6 · 1 in 97
- Arizona#8 · 1 in 117
- North Carolina#8 · 1 in 145
- California#9 · 1 in 122
Best ever in a state: #6 in Maryland, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #6 | 206 | 1 in 97 |
| New Mexico | #6 | 57 | 1 in 82 |
| Arizona | #8 | 242 | 1 in 117 |
| North Carolina | #8 | 321 | 1 in 145 |
| California | #9 | 1,323 | 1 in 122 |
| Texas | #9 | 1,275 | 1 in 126 |
| Florida | #10 | 515 | 1 in 168 |
| Georgia | #11 | 259 | 1 in 175 |
| Hawaii | #11 | 27 | 1 in 79 |
| Illinois | #11 | 281 | 1 in 158 |
| New York | #11 | 466 | 1 in 168 |
| Nevada | #12 | 77 | 1 in 119 |
| Virginia | #12 | 218 | 1 in 155 |
| Washington | #12 | 182 | 1 in 159 |
| Oklahoma | #13 | 96 | 1 in 154 |
| Connecticut | #15 | 81 | 1 in 142 |
| New Jersey | #15 | 240 | 1 in 148 |
| District of Columbia | #16 | 21 | 1 in 96 |
| Delaware | #18 | 20 | 1 in 113 |
| Rhode Island | #18 | 25 | 1 in 98 |
| Colorado | #20 | 131 | 1 in 178 |
| Nebraska | #20 | 47 | 1 in 151 |
| Indiana | #21 | 146 | 1 in 191 |
| Kansas | #22 | 69 | 1 in 171 |
| Oregon | #23 | 71 | 1 in 184 |
| Tennessee | #23 | 170 | 1 in 189 |
| Michigan | #24 | 172 | 1 in 208 |
| South Carolina | #24 | 89 | 1 in 206 |
| Wyoming | #24 | 9 | 1 in 90 |
| Iowa | #26 | 67 | 1 in 176 |
| Louisiana | #27 | 75 | 1 in 218 |
| Pennsylvania | #30 | 202 | 1 in 231 |
| Arkansas | #31 | 50 | 1 in 212 |
| Kentucky | #32 | 81 | 1 in 213 |
| Minnesota | #32 | 96 | 1 in 224 |
| West Virginia | #32 | 31 | 1 in 164 |
| Idaho | #35 | 37 | 1 in 194 |
| Massachusetts | #35 | 118 | 1 in 204 |
| Ohio | #35 | 185 | 1 in 256 |
| Alaska | #38 | 11 | 1 in 150 |
| Missouri | #39 | 100 | 1 in 243 |
| Wisconsin | #40 | 83 | 1 in 244 |
| Alabama | #46 | 67 | 1 in 273 |
| New Hampshire | #57 | 18 | 1 in 211 |
| North Dakota | #58 | 13 | 1 in 208 |
| South Dakota | #62 | 14 | 1 in 218 |
| Utah | #63 | 58 | 1 in 294 |
| Mississippi | #77 | 27 | 1 in 330 |
| Maine | #96 | 10 | 1 in 312 |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eliana
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 43 spots since 2020 (#53 → #10)
- Biggest jump: 2,034 spots in 1986
- Biggest drop: 376 spots in 1987
Rise & fade · girls
64 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1961
- Peaked 2025 at #10 (8,191 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
- Top 10: 1 yr · 2025
- Top 100: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Top 1,000: 36 yrs · run 1996–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 196
- Highest: 1 in 196 girls born in 2025 were named Eliana (0.51%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 43.8% of all girls named Eliana (33,359) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71 | #3,635 (1963) | #4,496 |
| 1970s | 150 | #3,512 (1978) | #4,318 |
| 1980s | 1,208 | #450 (1986) | #1,817 |
| 1990s | 2,368 | #624 (1999) | #885 |
| 2000s | 10,715 | #193 (2009) | #331 |
| 2010s | 28,233 | #62 (2019) | #114 |
| 2020s | 33,359 | #10 (2025) | #34 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Eliana ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: