Eliezer
- #14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births
- #893 for boys in 2025, 266 births
- Given to boys 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1982 · 115 births
- Debut · boys
- 11 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,164since 1947
Eliezer over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Eliezer has never cracked the top 800 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #893 | 266 |
| 2024 | — | #1,013 | 220 | |
| 2023 | — | #992 | 222 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,044 | 211 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,016 | 216 | |
| 2020 | — | #975 | 220 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,028 | 202 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,045 | 194 | |
| 2017 | — | #990 | 206 | |
| 2016 | — | #973 | 211 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,023 | 198 | |
| 2014 | — | #868 | 254 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,020 | 191 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,017 | 192 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,108 | 166 | |
| 2010 | — | #997 | 196 | |
| 2009 | — | #978 | 203 | |
| 2008 | — | #954 | 210 | |
| 2007 | — | #949 | 208 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,043 | 174 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,004 | 170 | |
| 2004 | — | #995 | 166 | |
| 2003 | — | #959 | 170 | |
| 2002 | — | #988 | 159 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,068 | 135 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,096 | 128 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,077 | 125 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,044 | 129 | |
| 1997 | — | #988 | 131 | |
| 1996 | — | #945 | 137 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,144 | 100 | |
| 1994 | — | #963 | 131 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,042 | 112 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,010 | 116 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,124 | 95 | |
| 1990 | — | #995 | 112 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,064 | 96 | |
| 1988 | — | #897 | 114 | |
| 1987 | — | #931 | 103 | |
| 1986 | — | #983 | 88 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,094 | 72 | |
| 1984 | — | #884 | 97 | |
| 1983 | — | #867 | 102 | |
| 1982 | — | #827 | 115 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,044 | 76 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,010 | 80 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,011 | 77 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,121 | 61 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,127 | 59 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,304 | 46 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,181 | 51 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,082 | 58 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,354 | 38 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,210 | 46 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,235 | 45 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,260 | 43 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,767 | 22 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,282 | 35 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,540 | 25 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,580 | 24 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,669 | 22 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,729 | 21 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,585 | 25 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,403 | 31 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,686 | 23 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,728 | 22 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,467 | 29 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,838 | 19 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,952 | 17 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,511 | 27 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,048 | 15 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,449 | 11 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,709 | 9 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,251 | 12 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,662 | 9 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,019 | 7 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #2,356 | 11 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1947
The first year at least five boys were named Eliezer! It came in at #2,356, and was given to 11 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1948, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Eliezer is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Jersey#183 · 1 in 736
- New York#252 · 1 in 1,111
- Connecticut#498 · 1 in 2,641
- Massachusetts#555 · 1 in 3,378
- Pennsylvania#742 · 1 in 4,751
Best ever in a state: #183 in New Jersey, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #183 | 54 | 1 in 736 |
| New York | #252 | 76 | 1 in 1,111 |
| Connecticut | #498 | 5 | 1 in 2,641 |
| Massachusetts | #555 | 8 | 1 in 3,378 |
| Pennsylvania | #742 | 11 | 1 in 4,751 |
| Indiana | #844 | 6 | 1 in 5,277 |
| Florida | #1,009 | 13 | 1 in 7,349 |
| Texas | #1,070 | 21 | 1 in 8,336 |
| Georgia | #1,096 | 7 | 1 in 7,174 |
| Ohio | #1,111 | 6 | 1 in 8,756 |
| California | #1,299 | 14 | 1 in 12,534 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eliezer
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 82 spots since 2020 (#975 → #893)
- Biggest jump: 217 spots in 1982
- Biggest drop: 210 spots in 1985
Rise & fade · boys
35 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 1982 at #827 (115 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 23 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 2007–2010
Share of babies · boys
1 in 6,421
- Highest: 1 in 6,421 boys born in 2025 were named Eliezer (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #827 in 1982, was only 1 in 15,778 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 24.6% of all boys named Eliezer (2,010) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 18 | #2,356 (1947) | #2,688 |
| 1950s | 153 | #1,467 (1959) | #2,257 |
| 1960s | 250 | #1,282 (1968) | #1,597 |
| 1970s | 524 | #1,011 (1979) | #1,189 |
| 1980s | 943 | #827 (1982) | #960 |
| 1990s | 1,188 | #945 (1996) | #1,033 |
| 2000s | 1,723 | #949 (2007) | #1,003 |
| 2010s | 2,010 | #868 (2014) | #1,007 |
| 2020s | 1,355 | #893 (2025) | #989 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Eliezer ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: