Eliott

Peak · boys
1888 · 5 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
2,096
since 1888

Eliott over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Eliott has never cracked the top 1,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank18801900192019401960198020002020peak #1,031, 1888boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025#2,30460
2024#1,95780
2023#2,07871
2022#2,16867
2021#1,93178
2020#2,13965
2019#2,17065
2018#1,88679
2017#1,97772
2016#2,04769
2015#1,89577
2014#2,06368
2013#1,96470
2012#2,18560
2011#1,96870
2010#2,37553
2009#2,28757
2008#2,46751
2007#3,18835
2006#2,44950
2005#2,49345
2004#3,28529
2003#2,92233
2002#3,67023
2001#3,14328
2000#2,73633
1999#2,93928
1998#3,19124
1997#2,82327
1996#3,67818
1995#2,44431
1994#2,68527
1993#3,14121
1992#2,46729
1991#2,40629
1990#2,01237
1989#1,89139
1988#3,07917
1987#2,33324
1986#3,00516
1985#3,07015
1984#2,29222
1983#2,34121
1982#3,28213
1981#3,22113
1980#3,43012
1979#3,81010
1978#2,79915
1977#3,20312
1976#4,9356
1975#2,90213
1974#3,5589
1973#2,71613
1972#3,9637
1971#3,6588
1970#3,07110
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966#3,9485
1965—
1964#4,0395
1963#3,0448
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950#2,7708
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940#3,1306
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920#4,2865
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888#1,0315
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1888

The first year at least five boys were named Eliott! It came in at #1,031, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1888–1939, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Eliott is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,829 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 21,934 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedHITexas: #2,080 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 25,007 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Eliott, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. California#1,829 · 1 in 21,934
  2. Texas#2,080 · 1 in 25,007

Best ever in a state: #480 in Oregon, 2011.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
California#1,82981 in 21,934
Texas#2,08071 in 25,007
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Eliott
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 165 spots since 2020 (#2,139 → #2,304)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1888
  • Peaked 1888 at #1,031 (5 births)
  • Births halved by 1889, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 21,536
  • Highest: 1 in 21,536 boys born in 2024 were named Eliott (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 28,468 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #1,031 in 1888, was only 1 in 24,170 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 32.6% of all boys named Eliott (683) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5#1,031 (1888)#1,031
1890s0——
1900s0——
1910s0——
1920s5#4,286 (1920)#4,286
1930s0——
1940s6#3,130 (1940)#3,130
1950s8#2,770 (1950)#2,770
1960s18#3,044 (1963)#3,677
1970s103#2,716 (1973)#3,462
1980s192#1,891 (1989)#2,794
1990s271#2,012 (1990)#2,779
2000s384#2,287 (2009)#2,864
2010s683#1,886 (2018)#2,053
2020s421#1,931 (2021)#2,096

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Eliott ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: