Elisha
- #2,859 for girls in 2025, 59 births
- #788 for boys in 2025, 322 births
- Given to boys 52.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1883 · 42 births
- Debut · boys
- 32 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 15,668since 1880
Elisha over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,859 | 59 | #788 | 322 |
| 2024 | #2,040 | 95 | #846 | 287 |
| 2023 | #2,352 | 77 | #853 | 283 |
| 2022 | #2,277 | 82 | #820 | 302 |
| 2021 | #2,266 | 81 | #869 | 266 |
| 2020 | #2,078 | 88 | #841 | 271 |
| 2019 | #1,745 | 118 | #748 | 319 |
| 2018 | #1,391 | 161 | #827 | 270 |
| 2017 | #1,580 | 138 | #798 | 286 |
| 2016 | #1,719 | 123 | #782 | 304 |
| 2015 | #1,743 | 120 | #776 | 305 |
| 2014 | #1,569 | 138 | #732 | 327 |
| 2013 | #1,420 | 160 | #688 | 348 |
| 2012 | #1,559 | 140 | #733 | 317 |
| 2011 | #1,571 | 139 | #730 | 311 |
| 2010 | #1,584 | 138 | #659 | 364 |
| 2009 | #1,538 | 147 | #703 | 342 |
| 2008 | #1,562 | 147 | #630 | 392 |
| 2007 | #1,298 | 188 | #656 | 365 |
| 2006 | #1,371 | 167 | #627 | 376 |
| 2005 | #1,362 | 159 | #600 | 377 |
| 2004 | #1,135 | 201 | #599 | 359 |
| 2003 | #1,242 | 169 | #616 | 337 |
| 2002 | #1,213 | 166 | #602 | 336 |
| 2001 | #1,177 | 174 | #631 | 300 |
| 2000 | #1,088 | 190 | #653 | 277 |
| 1999 | #1,066 | 189 | #631 | 284 |
| 1998 | #941 | 219 | #670 | 254 |
| 1997 | #982 | 199 | #687 | 234 |
| 1996 | #879 | 224 | #698 | 230 |
| 1995 | #870 | 221 | #750 | 204 |
| 1994 | #812 | 247 | #792 | 178 |
| 1993 | #786 | 260 | #901 | 142 |
| 1992 | #722 | 296 | #902 | 137 |
| 1991 | #711 | 297 | #893 | 139 |
| 1990 | #645 | 348 | #960 | 118 |
| 1989 | #599 | 358 | #1,009 | 103 |
| 1988 | #543 | 402 | #1,041 | 90 |
| 1987 | #479 | 450 | #1,009 | 88 |
| 1986 | #499 | 428 | #1,041 | 80 |
| 1985 | #452 | 481 | #901 | 101 |
| 1984 | #443 | 468 | #815 | 115 |
| 1983 | #409 | 525 | #908 | 94 |
| 1982 | #416 | 540 | #853 | 108 |
| 1981 | #400 | 565 | #875 | 103 |
| 1980 | #373 | 624 | #832 | 112 |
| 1979 | #398 | 546 | #906 | 93 |
| 1978 | #446 | 444 | #927 | 87 |
| 1977 | #465 | 421 | #937 | 82 |
| 1976 | #560 | 300 | #1,042 | 64 |
| 1975 | #660 | 230 | #984 | 69 |
| 1974 | #759 | 184 | #1,198 | 48 |
| 1973 | #830 | 158 | #1,376 | 37 |
| 1972 | #767 | 181 | #1,230 | 45 |
| 1971 | #882 | 151 | #1,400 | 37 |
| 1970 | #985 | 127 | #1,337 | 39 |
| 1969 | #1,139 | 95 | #1,642 | 25 |
| 1968 | #1,324 | 70 | #1,695 | 22 |
| 1967 | #1,219 | 76 | #2,139 | 14 |
| 1966 | #1,515 | 54 | #1,580 | 24 |
| 1965 | #1,263 | 72 | #1,405 | 30 |
| 1964 | #1,497 | 57 | #1,408 | 31 |
| 1963 | #1,522 | 54 | #1,426 | 30 |
| 1962 | #1,807 | 40 | #1,341 | 34 |
| 1961 | #2,036 | 33 | #1,686 | 23 |
| 1960 | #1,597 | 49 | #1,486 | 29 |
| 1959 | #2,289 | 25 | #1,337 | 34 |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | #1,370 | 32 |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | #1,300 | 36 |
| 1956 | #3,910 | 10 | #1,285 | 36 |
| 1955 | — | #1,114 | 44 | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #1,122 | 44 |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | #1,170 | 40 |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #1,152 | 41 |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #1,070 | 45 |
| 1950 | — | #989 | 49 | |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #958 | 52 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | #1,079 | 43 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #1,064 | 46 |
| 1946 | — | #1,019 | 45 | |
| 1945 | — | #954 | 46 | |
| 1944 | — | #964 | 45 | |
| 1943 | — | #969 | 48 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,007 | 44 | |
| 1941 | — | #925 | 47 | |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | #841 | 56 |
| 1939 | — | #904 | 47 | |
| 1938 | — | #992 | 41 | |
| 1937 | — | #896 | 48 | |
| 1936 | — | #882 | 48 | |
| 1935 | — | #858 | 53 | |
| 1934 | — | #798 | 60 | |
| 1933 | — | #937 | 45 | |
| 1932 | — | #812 | 62 | |
| 1931 | — | #787 | 63 | |
| 1930 | — | #755 | 71 | |
| 1929 | — | #844 | 60 | |
| 1928 | — | #796 | 67 | |
| 1927 | — | #726 | 80 | |
| 1926 | — | #759 | 72 | |
| 1925 | — | #766 | 74 | |
| 1924 | — | #793 | 72 | |
| 1923 | — | #682 | 89 | |
| 1922 | — | #653 | 96 | |
| 1921 | — | #647 | 99 | |
| 1920 | — | #792 | 71 | |
| 1919 | — | #704 | 79 | |
| 1918 | — | #782 | 69 | |
| 1917 | — | #674 | 79 | |
| 1916 | — | #650 | 81 | |
| 1915 | — | #791 | 58 | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #819 | 42 |
| 1913 | — | #667 | 45 | |
| 1912 | — | #622 | 44 | |
| 1911 | — | #584 | 27 | |
| 1910 | — | #569 | 25 | |
| 1909 | — | #530 | 24 | |
| 1908 | — | #825 | 11 | |
| 1907 | — | #511 | 21 | |
| 1906 | — | #613 | 15 | |
| 1905 | — | #592 | 16 | |
| 1904 | — | #417 | 25 | |
| 1903 | — | #393 | 25 | |
| 1902 | — | #426 | 23 | |
| 1901 | — | #433 | 19 | |
| 1900 | — | #357 | 37 | |
| 1899 | — | #355 | 26 | |
| 1898 | — | #339 | 32 | |
| 1897 | — | #459 | 18 | |
| 1896 | — | #407 | 23 | |
| 1895 | — | #316 | 33 | |
| 1894 | — | #349 | 27 | |
| 1893 | — | #448 | 17 | |
| 1892 | — | #357 | 28 | |
| 1891 | — | #318 | 28 | |
| 1890 | — | #358 | 24 | |
| 1889 | — | #322 | 29 | |
| 1888 | — | #289 | 37 | |
| 1887 | — | #366 | 20 | |
| 1886 | — | #288 | 35 | |
| 1885 | — | #268 | 38 | |
| 1884 | — | #271 | 39 | |
| 1883 | — | #253 | 42 | |
| 1882 | — | #288 | 35 | |
| 1881 | — | #296 | 29 | |
| 1880 | — | #291 | 32 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Elisha was already there! It came in at #291, and was given to 32 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1908, when fewer than 12 boys a year got the name.
Where Elisha is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- South Carolina#438 · 1 in 1,927
- Alabama#450 · 1 in 1,956
- Kansas#468 · 1 in 2,007
- Kentucky#485 · 1 in 2,282
- Tennessee#499 · 1 in 2,451
Best ever in a state: #179 in North Carolina, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #438 | 11 | 1 in 1,927 |
| Alabama | #450 | 11 | 1 in 1,956 |
| Kansas | #468 | 7 | 1 in 2,007 |
| Kentucky | #485 | 9 | 1 in 2,282 |
| Tennessee | #499 | 15 | 1 in 2,451 |
| Minnesota | #552 | 9 | 1 in 2,722 |
| Oregon | #604 | 5 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Oklahoma | #621 | 6 | 1 in 2,947 |
| Missouri | #648 | 8 | 1 in 3,476 |
| Louisiana | #672 | 6 | 1 in 3,188 |
| Florida | #681 | 23 | 1 in 4,154 |
| Maryland | #702 | 6 | 1 in 3,816 |
| Pennsylvania | #704 | 12 | 1 in 4,355 |
| Indiana | #711 | 8 | 1 in 3,958 |
| Texas | #723 | 38 | 1 in 4,607 |
| Virginia | #727 | 9 | 1 in 4,139 |
| Colorado | #756 | 6 | 1 in 4,475 |
| Michigan | #768 | 9 | 1 in 4,466 |
| Georgia | #792 | 11 | 1 in 4,566 |
| Washington | #801 | 7 | 1 in 4,685 |
| New Jersey | #829 | 7 | 1 in 5,681 |
| Arizona | #844 | 6 | 1 in 5,454 |
| New York | #844 | 16 | 1 in 5,276 |
| North Carolina | #873 | 9 | 1 in 5,719 |
| Ohio | #940 | 8 | 1 in 6,567 |
| California | #1,085 | 19 | 1 in 9,235 |
| Illinois | #1,133 | 6 | 1 in 8,259 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elisha
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 53 spots since 2020 (#841 → #788)
- 12 spots since 2015 (#776 → #788)
- Biggest jump: 295 spots in 1909
- Biggest drop: 314 spots in 1908
Rise & fade · boys
3 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #253 (42 births)
- Births halved by 1887, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 113 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1941
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,491
- Highest: 1 in 2,491 boys born in 1883 were named Elisha (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,305 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 22.1% of all boys named Elisha (3,461) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1996
- Mostly girls until 1995, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 336 | #253 (1883) | #293 |
| 1890s | 256 | #316 (1895) | #371 |
| 1900s | 216 | #357 (1900) | #510 |
| 1910s | 549 | #569 (1910) | #686 |
| 1920s | 780 | #647 (1921) | #746 |
| 1930s | 538 | #755 (1930) | #862 |
| 1940s | 472 | #841 (1940) | #978 |
| 1950s | 401 | #989 (1950) | #1,191 |
| 1960s | 262 | #1,341 (1962) | #1,581 |
| 1970s | 601 | #906 (1979) | #1,134 |
| 1980s | 994 | #815 (1984) | #928 |
| 1990s | 1,920 | #631 (1999) | #788 |
| 2000s | 3,461 | #599 (2004) | #632 |
| 2010s | 3,151 | #659 (2010) | #747 |
| 2020s | 1,731 | #788 (2025) | #836 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Elisha ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: