Elizah
- #3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births
- Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349
- Given to girls 58.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 48 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 815since 1991
Elizah over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,645 | 41 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,277 | 48 | #12,349 | 5 |
| 2023 | #3,585 | 43 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 | #9,823 | 7 |
| 2021 | #3,735 | 40 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #3,607 | 41 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,162 | 34 | #9,756 | 7 |
| 2018 | #4,144 | 34 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #3,305 | 48 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #4,083 | 36 | #7,605 | 10 |
| 2015 | #4,144 | 35 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #5,163 | 26 | — | |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,707 | 30 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #4,915 | 28 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #4,494 | 32 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #5,226 | 27 | #7,692 | 10 |
| 2008 | #7,408 | 17 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #7,394 | 17 | #5,210 | 17 |
| 2006 | #6,125 | 21 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #5,555 | 22 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #5,795 | 20 | #5,877 | 12 |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 | #5,395 | 13 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | #4,476 | 17 |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #3,986 | 18 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #4,668 | 13 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #5,124 | 11 |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | — | #8,435 | 5 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | #7,905 | 5 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #5,926 | 6 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | #6,385 | 5 | |
| 1981 | — | #5,468 | 6 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,495 | 8 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,810 | 10 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #3,646 | 6 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,640 | 6 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,097 | 8 | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,798 | 5 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #2,662 | 9 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,251 | 12 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,309 | 10 | |
| 1943 | — | #3,231 | 6 | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,478 | 9 | |
| 1939 | — | #3,480 | 5 | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,776 | 5 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,289 | 7 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,959 | 5 | |
| 1928 | — | #3,697 | 6 | |
| 1927 | — | #3,451 | 7 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #3,505 | 7 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,331 | 13 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,486 | 12 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,517 | 7 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,815 | 6 | |
| 1919 | — | #4,168 | 5 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,368 | 7 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #3,516 | 6 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #1,310 | 5 | |
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five girls were named Elizah! It came in at #13,147, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1991–1992, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Elizah is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #2,038 | 10 | 1 in 16,054 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elizah
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 38 spots since 2020 (#3,607 → #3,645)
- 499 spots since 2015 (#4,144 → #3,645)
Rise & fade · girls
33 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2024 at #3,277 (48 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 33,754
- Highest: 1 in 33,754 girls born in 2024 were named Elizah (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 39,202 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 38.9% of all girls named Elizah (317) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2002
- Mostly boys until 2001, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54 | #8,079 (1995) | #10,515 |
| 2000s | 187 | #5,226 (2009) | #6,506 |
| 2010s | 317 | #3,305 (2017) | #4,725 |
| 2020s | 257 | #3,277 (2024) | #3,564 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Elizah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: