Elizebeth
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 18 births
- Debut · girls
- 18 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,603since 1880
Elizebeth over time
Rank among girls' names. Elizebeth has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 |
| 2011 | #8,614 | 13 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 |
| 2008 | #9,476 | 12 |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 |
| 2006 | #5,709 | 23 |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 |
| 2001 | #4,447 | 27 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 |
| 1999 | #3,970 | 29 |
| 1998 | #4,366 | 25 |
| 1997 | #5,228 | 19 |
| 1996 | #4,306 | 24 |
| 1995 | #4,217 | 24 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 |
| 1992 | #4,849 | 20 |
| 1991 | #4,808 | 20 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 |
| 1988 | #4,840 | 17 |
| 1987 | #2,972 | 32 |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 |
| 1985 | #3,008 | 30 |
| 1984 | #3,329 | 25 |
| 1983 | #3,340 | 24 |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 |
| 1981 | #3,066 | 28 |
| 1980 | #3,411 | 24 |
| 1979 | #3,078 | 27 |
| 1978 | #2,516 | 34 |
| 1977 | #2,216 | 41 |
| 1976 | #3,002 | 24 |
| 1975 | #2,680 | 28 |
| 1974 | #2,835 | 25 |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 |
| 1972 | #2,680 | 26 |
| 1971 | #2,212 | 36 |
| 1970 | #1,952 | 43 |
| 1969 | #1,980 | 40 |
| 1968 | #1,940 | 38 |
| 1967 | #2,117 | 31 |
| 1966 | #1,621 | 48 |
| 1965 | #1,622 | 48 |
| 1964 | #1,635 | 49 |
| 1963 | #1,672 | 47 |
| 1962 | #1,429 | 60 |
| 1961 | #1,465 | 58 |
| 1960 | #1,454 | 57 |
| 1959 | #1,499 | 52 |
| 1958 | #1,512 | 50 |
| 1957 | #1,928 | 32 |
| 1956 | #2,194 | 25 |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 |
| 1954 | #1,602 | 40 |
| 1953 | #1,671 | 35 |
| 1952 | #1,487 | 42 |
| 1951 | #1,772 | 30 |
| 1950 | #1,474 | 39 |
| 1949 | #1,353 | 46 |
| 1948 | #1,576 | 35 |
| 1947 | #1,545 | 37 |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 |
| 1945 | #1,543 | 28 |
| 1944 | #1,272 | 39 |
| 1943 | #1,395 | 35 |
| 1942 | #1,300 | 38 |
| 1941 | #1,310 | 34 |
| 1940 | #1,242 | 35 |
| 1939 | #1,066 | 45 |
| 1938 | #1,182 | 38 |
| 1937 | #950 | 53 |
| 1936 | #1,039 | 45 |
| 1935 | #984 | 49 |
| 1934 | #1,098 | 41 |
| 1933 | #923 | 54 |
| 1932 | #1,004 | 49 |
| 1931 | #887 | 60 |
| 1930 | #926 | 62 |
| 1929 | #731 | 91 |
| 1928 | #724 | 95 |
| 1927 | #786 | 85 |
| 1926 | #757 | 91 |
| 1925 | #833 | 80 |
| 1924 | #797 | 87 |
| 1923 | #845 | 75 |
| 1922 | #939 | 62 |
| 1921 | #892 | 68 |
| 1920 | #797 | 82 |
| 1919 | #814 | 74 |
| 1918 | #900 | 63 |
| 1917 | #800 | 74 |
| 1916 | #867 | 62 |
| 1915 | #856 | 58 |
| 1914 | #817 | 51 |
| 1913 | #946 | 32 |
| 1912 | #781 | 41 |
| 1911 | #1,113 | 16 |
| 1910 | #812 | 28 |
| 1909 | #669 | 35 |
| 1908 | #829 | 22 |
| 1907 | #871 | 19 |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 |
| 1905 | #848 | 19 |
| 1904 | #1,170 | 10 |
| 1903 | #836 | 17 |
| 1902 | #716 | 23 |
| 1901 | #684 | 22 |
| 1900 | #742 | 24 |
| 1899 | #644 | 23 |
| 1898 | #886 | 15 |
| 1897 | #735 | 18 |
| 1896 | #621 | 25 |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 |
| 1894 | #682 | 19 |
| 1893 | #614 | 22 |
| 1892 | #565 | 24 |
| 1891 | #669 | 16 |
| 1890 | #642 | 17 |
| 1889 | #555 | 21 |
| 1888 | #525 | 23 |
| 1887 | #537 | 17 |
| 1886 | #459 | 22 |
| 1885 | #446 | 22 |
| 1884 | #501 | 17 |
| 1883 | #499 | 15 |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 |
| 1880 | #388 | 18 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Elizebeth was already there! It came in at #388, and was given to 18 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2013–2017, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Elizebeth is popular in 1912
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#325 · 1 in 2,828
Best ever in a state: #273 in South Carolina, 1929.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #325 | 7 | 1 in 2,828 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elizebeth
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Biggest jump: 358 spots in 1907 (#1,229 → #871)
- Biggest drop: 381 spots in 1906 (#848 → #1,229)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #388 (18 births)
- Births halved by 1881, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 52 yrs · run 1880–1903
- Highest: 1 in 5,055 girls born in 1880 were named Elizebeth (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 324,038 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- 17.7% of all girls named Elizebeth (816) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 175 | #388 (1880) | #506 |
| 1890s | 199 | #565 (1892) | #676 |
| 1900s | 201 | #669 (1909) | #859 |
| 1910s | 499 | #781 (1912) | #871 |
| 1920s | 816 | #724 (1928) | #810 |
| 1930s | 496 | #887 (1931) | #1,006 |
| 1940s | 354 | #1,242 (1940) | #1,426 |
| 1950s | 382 | #1,474 (1950) | #1,683 |
| 1960s | 476 | #1,429 (1962) | #1,694 |
| 1970s | 310 | #1,952 (1970) | #2,586 |
| 1980s | 238 | #2,972 (1987) | #3,767 |
| 1990s | 210 | #3,970 (1999) | #4,887 |
| 2000s | 177 | #4,447 (2001) | #7,026 |
| 2010s | 65 | #8,614 (2011) | #13,696 |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,293 (2024) | #15,293 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Elizebeth in 1912
Top girls' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 13,613 of them was named Elizebeth, which outranked 77.3% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).