Elma
#4,352 for girls in 2025, 32 births · Last seen for boys in 1957 at #3,024
Given to girls 97.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1901 · 189 births
- Debut · girls
- 28 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 21,703since 1880
Elma over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Elma has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,352 | 32 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,560 | 30 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,390 | 23 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,172 | 25 | — | |
| 2021 | #4,326 | 32 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,325 | 18 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,909 | 27 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,357 | 32 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,488 | 31 | — | |
| 2014 | #5,025 | 27 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,216 | 35 | — | |
| 2011 | #4,353 | 33 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,608 | 31 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,107 | 37 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,179 | 37 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,983 | 39 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,992 | 37 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,257 | 47 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,819 | 37 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,956 | 51 | — | |
| 2002 | #3,394 | 40 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,963 | 48 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,453 | 38 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,443 | 36 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | — | |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 | — | |
| 1996 | #4,883 | 20 | — | |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | — | |
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | — | |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,358 | 21 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,496 | 19 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,459 | 13 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,730 | 22 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,144 | 27 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,530 | 23 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,609 | 22 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,680 | 31 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,267 | 23 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,439 | 33 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,612 | 29 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,254 | 35 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,309 | 33 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,975 | 41 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,937 | 44 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,267 | 34 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,784 | 47 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,625 | 50 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,617 | 49 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,632 | 47 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,350 | 66 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,433 | 62 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,262 | 76 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,283 | 74 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,305 | 72 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,020 | 111 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,130 | 89 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,000 | 108 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,072 | 94 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #1,007 | 103 | — | |
| 1955 | #978 | 104 | — | |
| 1954 | #897 | 114 | — | |
| 1953 | #809 | 129 | — | |
| 1952 | #791 | 130 | — | |
| 1951 | #794 | 125 | #3,364 | 6 |
| 1950 | #717 | 143 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #683 | 150 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #661 | 159 | #3,010 | 7 |
| 1947 | #643 | 167 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #624 | 162 | — | |
| 1945 | #547 | 179 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #576 | 162 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #517 | 208 | — | |
| 1942 | #495 | 226 | #2,712 | 8 |
| 1941 | #501 | 193 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1940 | #470 | 204 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #469 | 204 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #428 | 244 | #2,185 | 11 |
| 1937 | #436 | 225 | #1,756 | 16 |
| 1936 | #396 | 258 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #393 | 267 | #2,529 | 9 |
| 1934 | #375 | 285 | #2,393 | 10 |
| 1933 | #369 | 297 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #373 | 299 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #339 | 352 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #345 | 362 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #341 | 360 | #2,317 | 12 |
| 1928 | #321 | 424 | #1,822 | 18 |
| 1927 | #308 | 465 | #1,796 | 19 |
| 1926 | #313 | 449 | #1,605 | 22 |
| 1925 | #301 | 487 | #1,935 | 17 |
| 1924 | #290 | 522 | #2,229 | 14 |
| 1923 | #289 | 494 | #1,874 | 18 |
| 1922 | #268 | 579 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #271 | 610 | #1,904 | 18 |
| 1920 | #266 | 600 | #1,747 | 20 |
| 1919 | #262 | 594 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #249 | 659 | #2,073 | 15 |
| 1917 | #256 | 580 | #2,732 | 9 |
| 1916 | #246 | 622 | #1,459 | 23 |
| 1915 | #245 | 575 | #2,184 | 12 |
| 1914 | #242 | 484 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #245 | 388 | #1,497 | 13 |
| 1912 | #233 | 375 | #1,527 | 11 |
| 1911 | #248 | 252 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #234 | 273 | — | |
| 1909 | #227 | 248 | — | |
| 1908 | #234 | 208 | — | |
| 1907 | #219 | 228 | — | |
| 1906 | #227 | 193 | — | |
| 1905 | #243 | 171 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #248 | 160 | — | |
| 1903 | #235 | 162 | — | |
| 1902 | #210 | 199 | — | |
| 1901 | #209 | 189 | — | |
| 1900 | #235 | 182 | — | |
| 1899 | #238 | 136 | — | |
| 1898 | #221 | 172 | — | |
| 1897 | #218 | 156 | — | |
| 1896 | #219 | 160 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #234 | 137 | — | |
| 1894 | #237 | 127 | — | |
| 1893 | #230 | 129 | — | |
| 1892 | #248 | 112 | — | |
| 1891 | #223 | 118 | — | |
| 1890 | #234 | 108 | — | |
| 1889 | #235 | 98 | — | |
| 1888 | #234 | 97 | — | |
| 1887 | #246 | 73 | — | |
| 1886 | #222 | 82 | — | |
| 1885 | #227 | 76 | — | |
| 1884 | #253 | 59 | — | |
| 1883 | #274 | 42 | — | |
| 1882 | #250 | 47 | — | |
| 1881 | #247 | 41 | — | |
| 1880 | #294 | 28 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Elma was already there! It came in at #294, and was given to 28 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1987, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Elma is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Idaho#47 · 1 in 126
- Utah#77 · 1 in 210
- Kansas#93 · 1 in 368
- South Carolina#157 · 1 in 780
- Ohio#160 · 1 in 936
Best ever in a state: #47 in Idaho, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #47 | 6 | 1 in 126 |
| Utah | #77 | 5 | 1 in 210 |
| Kansas | #93 | 13 | 1 in 368 |
| South Carolina | #157 | 12 | 1 in 780 |
| Ohio | #160 | 16 | 1 in 936 |
| Wisconsin | #168 | 7 | 1 in 972 |
| California | #170 | 7 | 1 in 850 |
| Michigan | #177 | 9 | 1 in 964 |
| North Carolina | #177 | 13 | 1 in 970 |
| Missouri | #185 | 11 | 1 in 994 |
| Louisiana | #197 | 10 | 1 in 971 |
| Arkansas | #201 | 8 | 1 in 942 |
| Iowa | #201 | 5 | 1 in 1,143 |
| Oklahoma | #208 | 7 | 1 in 1,039 |
| Georgia | #211 | 11 | 1 in 1,418 |
| Indiana | #211 | 5 | 1 in 1,478 |
| Mississippi | #226 | 9 | 1 in 1,163 |
| Pennsylvania | #234 | 13 | 1 in 2,431 |
| New York | #243 | 15 | 1 in 2,162 |
| Tennessee | #243 | 7 | 1 in 1,497 |
| Texas | #245 | 17 | 1 in 1,136 |
| Alabama | #255 | 8 | 1 in 1,638 |
| Illinois | #256 | 9 | 1 in 2,044 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elma
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 208 spots since 2024 (#4,560 → #4,352)
- 1,973 spots since 2020 (#6,325 → #4,352)
- 136 spots since 2015 (#4,488 → #4,352)
- Biggest jump: 72 spots in 1958 (#1,072 → #1,000)
- Biggest drop: 130 spots in 1959 (#1,000 → #1,130)
Rise & fade · girls
21 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1901 at #209 (189 births)
- Births halved by 1957, 56 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 77 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 77 yrs · run 1880–1955
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,266
- Highest: 1 in 1,266 girls born in 1901 were named Elma (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 50,227 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 23.0% of all girls named Elma (4,990) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 643 | #222 (1886) | #248 |
| 1890s | 1,355 | #218 (1897) | #230 |
| 1900s | 1,940 | #209 (1901) | #229 |
| 1910s | 4,802 | #233 (1912) | #246 |
| 1920s | 4,990 | #266 (1920) | #297 |
| 1930s | 2,793 | #339 (1931) | #392 |
| 1940s | 1,810 | #470 (1940) | #572 |
| 1950s | 1,139 | #717 (1950) | #920 |
| 1960s | 654 | #1,020 (1960) | #1,431 |
| 1970s | 329 | #1,937 (1971) | #2,489 |
| 1980s | 196 | #3,144 (1984) | #4,292 |
| 1990s | 183 | #3,443 (1999) | #5,523 |
| 2000s | 411 | #2,956 (2003) | #3,610 |
| 2010s | 298 | #4,216 (2012) | #4,697 |
| 2020s | 160 | #4,326 (2021) | #5,021 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Elma in 1910
girls
#234
273 births · 1 in 1,452 girls
Top girls' names in 1910
More about 1910
girls
396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 1,452 of them was named Elma, which outranked 91.6% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).