Eloise
#49 for girls in 2025, 4,251 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 4,251 births
- Debut · girls
- 11 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 72,699since 1880
Eloise over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #49 | 4,251 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #64 | 3,443 | — | |
| 2023 | #81 | 2,924 | — | |
| 2022 | #86 | 2,905 | — | |
| 2021 | #109 | 2,547 | — | |
| 2020 | #137 | 1,970 | — | |
| 2019 | #149 | 1,902 | — | |
| 2018 | #167 | 1,743 | — | |
| 2017 | #190 | 1,630 | — | |
| 2016 | #208 | 1,567 | — | |
| 2015 | #254 | 1,265 | — | |
| 2014 | #302 | 1,081 | — | |
| 2013 | #337 | 955 | — | |
| 2012 | #363 | 860 | — | |
| 2011 | #449 | 679 | — | |
| 2010 | #527 | 553 | — | |
| 2009 | #911 | 297 | — | |
| 2008 | #998 | 265 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,283 | 191 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,307 | 179 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,328 | 165 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,404 | 148 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,813 | 103 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,984 | 88 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,115 | 78 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,545 | 59 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,610 | 54 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,570 | 53 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,224 | 36 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,723 | 29 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,977 | 39 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,752 | 44 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,100 | 25 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,866 | 27 | — | |
| 1991 | #4,208 | 24 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,714 | 28 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,477 | 29 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,393 | 28 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,101 | 30 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,084 | 29 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,423 | 24 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,595 | 34 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,369 | 41 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,119 | 48 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,002 | 29 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,387 | 39 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,942 | 27 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,366 | 22 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,255 | 37 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,196 | 38 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,556 | 29 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,647 | 55 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,749 | 50 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,546 | 63 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,464 | 69 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,546 | 59 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,177 | 84 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,147 | 85 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,017 | 103 | — | |
| 1965 | #854 | 138 | — | |
| 1964 | #940 | 126 | — | |
| 1963 | #811 | 163 | — | |
| 1962 | #767 | 183 | — | |
| 1961 | #788 | 177 | — | |
| 1960 | #747 | 187 | — | |
| 1959 | #677 | 218 | — | |
| 1958 | #647 | 232 | — | |
| 1957 | #544 | 310 | — | |
| 1956 | #503 | 348 | — | |
| 1955 | #508 | 331 | — | |
| 1954 | #469 | 355 | — | |
| 1953 | #408 | 438 | — | |
| 1952 | #400 | 432 | — | |
| 1951 | #365 | 488 | — | |
| 1950 | #341 | 524 | — | |
| 1949 | #359 | 483 | — | |
| 1948 | #343 | 512 | — | |
| 1947 | #327 | 580 | — | |
| 1946 | #296 | 608 | — | |
| 1945 | #292 | 546 | — | |
| 1944 | #281 | 597 | — | |
| 1943 | #259 | 715 | — | |
| 1942 | #250 | 746 | — | |
| 1941 | #266 | 584 | — | |
| 1940 | #277 | 512 | — | |
| 1939 | #269 | 531 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #256 | 608 | — | |
| 1937 | #250 | 636 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #250 | 611 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #230 | 729 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #235 | 719 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1933 | #210 | 819 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #208 | 867 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #197 | 926 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #189 | 1,023 | — | |
| 1929 | #194 | 1,013 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #190 | 1,082 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #180 | 1,162 | #2,703 | 10 |
| 1926 | #175 | 1,208 | #3,708 | 6 |
| 1925 | #180 | 1,212 | — | |
| 1924 | #185 | 1,212 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #181 | 1,193 | — | |
| 1922 | #179 | 1,222 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #164 | 1,379 | — | |
| 1920 | #178 | 1,239 | #2,967 | 9 |
| 1919 | #188 | 1,030 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #189 | 1,063 | — | |
| 1917 | #191 | 964 | — | |
| 1916 | #187 | 953 | — | |
| 1915 | #207 | 798 | — | |
| 1914 | #198 | 663 | — | |
| 1913 | #202 | 529 | — | |
| 1912 | #202 | 474 | — | |
| 1911 | #219 | 324 | — | |
| 1910 | #234 | 273 | — | |
| 1909 | #230 | 243 | — | |
| 1908 | #239 | 201 | — | |
| 1907 | #239 | 196 | — | |
| 1906 | #244 | 176 | — | |
| 1905 | #267 | 151 | — | |
| 1904 | #294 | 120 | — | |
| 1903 | #264 | 134 | — | |
| 1902 | #280 | 124 | — | |
| 1901 | #320 | 88 | — | |
| 1900 | #327 | 107 | — | |
| 1899 | #312 | 92 | — | |
| 1898 | #328 | 91 | — | |
| 1897 | #354 | 68 | — | |
| 1896 | #332 | 77 | — | |
| 1895 | #372 | 57 | — | |
| 1894 | #372 | 56 | — | |
| 1893 | #374 | 52 | — | |
| 1892 | #351 | 56 | — | |
| 1891 | #365 | 46 | — | |
| 1890 | #369 | 46 | — | |
| 1889 | #410 | 35 | — | |
| 1888 | #425 | 34 | — | |
| 1887 | #390 | 31 | — | |
| 1886 | #346 | 38 | — | |
| 1885 | #373 | 30 | — | |
| 1884 | #463 | 19 | — | |
| 1883 | #451 | 18 | — | |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | — | |
| 1881 | #447 | 14 | — | |
| 1880 | #518 | 11 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Eloise was already there! It came in at #518, and was given to 11 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 15 girls a year got the name.
Where Eloise is popular in 1918
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- District of Columbia#66 · 1 in 269
- South Carolina#78 · 1 in 294
- Florida#86 · 1 in 305
- Georgia#104 · 1 in 429
- Louisiana#107 · 1 in 441
Best ever in a state: #17 in Vermont, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #66 | 11 | 1 in 269 |
| South Carolina | #78 | 74 | 1 in 294 |
| Florida | #86 | 32 | 1 in 305 |
| Georgia | #104 | 80 | 1 in 429 |
| Louisiana | #107 | 47 | 1 in 441 |
| Alabama | #109 | 63 | 1 in 425 |
| West Virginia | #110 | 38 | 1 in 462 |
| North Carolina | #125 | 58 | 1 in 585 |
| Washington | #134 | 14 | 1 in 708 |
| Oregon | #140 | 8 | 1 in 673 |
| Indiana | #146 | 33 | 1 in 787 |
| Ohio | #148 | 64 | 1 in 852 |
| Mississippi | #150 | 30 | 1 in 643 |
| Virginia | #158 | 30 | 1 in 905 |
| Iowa | #159 | 25 | 1 in 880 |
| Montana | #166 | 7 | 1 in 917 |
| California | #175 | 24 | 1 in 961 |
| Illinois | #178 | 52 | 1 in 1,192 |
| North Dakota | #180 | 7 | 1 in 1,090 |
| Maryland | #181 | 11 | 1 in 1,250 |
| Texas | #182 | 65 | 1 in 762 |
| Kansas | #183 | 16 | 1 in 997 |
| Michigan | #193 | 26 | 1 in 1,410 |
| Utah | #193 | 6 | 1 in 875 |
| New Mexico | #196 | 5 | 1 in 746 |
| Kentucky | #206 | 24 | 1 in 1,126 |
| Connecticut | #214 | 8 | 1 in 1,836 |
| Nebraska | #225 | 9 | 1 in 1,396 |
| Oklahoma | #225 | 20 | 1 in 1,167 |
| Minnesota | #234 | 13 | 1 in 1,732 |
| New York | #239 | 44 | 1 in 2,299 |
| Arkansas | #242 | 15 | 1 in 1,300 |
| Missouri | #248 | 18 | 1 in 1,708 |
| Tennessee | #248 | 15 | 1 in 1,714 |
| Pennsylvania | #284 | 26 | 1 in 3,829 |
| Wisconsin | #285 | 9 | 1 in 2,776 |
| Massachusetts | #327 | 8 | 1 in 4,617 |
| New Jersey | #358 | 5 | 1 in 6,328 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eloise
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 15 spots since 2024 (#64 → #49)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#137 → #49)
- 205 spots since 2015 (#254 → #49)
- Biggest jump: 384 spots in 2010 (#911 → #527)
- Biggest drop: 163 spots in 1966 (#854 → #1,017)
Rise & fade · girls
145 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #49 (4,251 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · run 2022–2025
- Top 1,000: 104 yrs · run 1880–1965
Share of babies · girls
1 in 378
- Highest: 1 in 378 girls born in 2025 were named Eloise (0.26%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 24.8% of all girls named Eloise (18,040) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #164 (1921) → #4,208 (1991) → #49 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 242 | #346 (1886) | #435 |
| 1890s | 641 | #312 (1899) | #353 |
| 1900s | 1,540 | #230 (1909) | #270 |
| 1910s | 7,071 | #187 (1916) | #202 |
| 1920s | 11,922 | #164 (1921) | #181 |
| 1930s | 7,469 | #189 (1930) | #229 |
| 1940s | 5,883 | #250 (1942) | #295 |
| 1950s | 3,676 | #341 (1950) | #486 |
| 1960s | 1,305 | #747 (1960) | #979 |
| 1970s | 429 | #1,464 (1970) | #2,211 |
| 1980s | 314 | #2,119 (1981) | #3,032 |
| 1990s | 359 | #2,570 (1998) | #3,374 |
| 2000s | 1,573 | #911 (2009) | #1,569 |
| 2010s | 12,235 | #149 (2019) | #295 |
| 2020s | 18,040 | #49 (2025) | #88 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eloise in 1918
girls
#189
1,063 births · 1 in 1,089 girls
Top girls' names in 1918
More about 1918
girls
1,157,631 girls got a published name in 1918; 1 in 1,089 of them was named Eloise, which outranked 96.6% of the 5,585 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Eloise
Biggest movers since 1917
Risers
- ↑ 547Jesse#1,507 → #960
- ↑ 494Liberty#1,079 → #585
- ↑ 389Marilynn#1,337 → #948
- ↑ 312Margueritte#1,281 → #969
- ↑ 306Syble#807 → #501
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.