Elouise
#788 for girls in 2025, 344 births · Last seen for boys in 1924 at #4,347
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1933 · 232 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,398since 1889
Elouise over time
Rank among girls' names. Elouise has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #788 | 344 | — | |
| 2024 | #970 | 267 | — | |
| 2023 | #953 | 274 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,077 | 233 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,129 | 218 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,318 | 167 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,218 | 192 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,540 | 141 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,591 | 137 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,865 | 110 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,442 | 74 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,508 | 71 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,314 | 49 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,358 | 25 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,306 | 34 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | — | |
| 2006 | #10,611 | 10 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | — | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | — | |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | — | |
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | — | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,577 | 17 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,610 | 14 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,167 | 30 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,558 | 13 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,204 | 29 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,246 | 29 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,094 | 32 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,757 | 42 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,666 | 46 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,597 | 49 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,417 | 57 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,203 | 78 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,202 | 77 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,086 | 90 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,347 | 56 | — | |
| 1954 | #969 | 100 | — | |
| 1953 | #874 | 115 | — | |
| 1952 | #863 | 114 | — | |
| 1951 | #819 | 119 | — | |
| 1950 | #738 | 136 | — | |
| 1949 | #737 | 134 | — | |
| 1948 | #681 | 148 | — | |
| 1947 | #667 | 159 | — | |
| 1946 | #645 | 150 | — | |
| 1945 | #559 | 173 | — | |
| 1944 | #562 | 168 | — | |
| 1943 | #526 | 203 | — | |
| 1942 | #517 | 206 | — | |
| 1941 | #513 | 180 | — | |
| 1940 | #549 | 157 | — | |
| 1939 | #493 | 183 | — | |
| 1938 | #507 | 173 | — | |
| 1937 | #478 | 188 | — | |
| 1936 | #482 | 177 | — | |
| 1935 | #450 | 205 | — | |
| 1934 | #439 | 219 | — | |
| 1933 | #420 | 232 | — | |
| 1932 | #440 | 225 | — | |
| 1931 | #450 | 204 | — | |
| 1930 | #427 | 242 | — | |
| 1929 | #450 | 214 | — | |
| 1928 | #435 | 241 | — | |
| 1927 | #434 | 249 | — | |
| 1926 | #428 | 259 | — | |
| 1925 | #425 | 265 | — | |
| 1924 | #426 | 272 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #427 | 248 | — | |
| 1922 | #459 | 223 | — | |
| 1921 | #499 | 198 | — | |
| 1920 | #456 | 220 | — | |
| 1919 | #477 | 195 | — | |
| 1918 | #526 | 175 | — | |
| 1917 | #550 | 149 | — | |
| 1916 | #557 | 145 | — | |
| 1915 | #615 | 113 | — | |
| 1914 | #582 | 95 | — | |
| 1913 | #615 | 71 | — | |
| 1912 | #648 | 59 | — | |
| 1911 | #641 | 45 | — | |
| 1910 | #723 | 34 | — | |
| 1909 | #691 | 33 | — | |
| 1908 | #678 | 32 | — | |
| 1907 | #637 | 34 | — | |
| 1906 | #678 | 29 | — | |
| 1905 | #734 | 24 | — | |
| 1904 | #805 | 20 | — | |
| 1903 | #862 | 16 | — | |
| 1902 | #756 | 21 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,008 | 14 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | #1,167 | 8 | — | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | #1,437 | 5 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | — | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Elouise! It came in at #1,279, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1889–1891, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Elouise is popular in 1922
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#155 · 1 in 776
- Florida#171 · 1 in 728
- Louisiana#187 · 1 in 877
- Alabama#238 · 1 in 1,493
- Georgia#268 · 1 in 2,076
Best ever in a state: #94 in Florida, 1930.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #155 | 32 | 1 in 776 |
| Florida | #171 | 16 | 1 in 728 |
| Louisiana | #187 | 27 | 1 in 877 |
| Alabama | #238 | 21 | 1 in 1,493 |
| Georgia | #268 | 18 | 1 in 2,076 |
| North Carolina | #280 | 17 | 1 in 2,272 |
| Arkansas | #323 | 10 | 1 in 2,068 |
| Mississippi | #324 | 10 | 1 in 2,259 |
| Oklahoma | #366 | 9 | 1 in 2,783 |
| Texas | #443 | 20 | 1 in 2,948 |
| Michigan | #468 | 5 | 1 in 7,401 |
| New York | #625 | 6 | 1 in 16,475 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elouise
- 182 spots since 2024 (#970 → #788)
- 530 spots since 2020 (#1,318 → #788)
- 1,005 spots since 2015 (#1,793 → #788)
- Biggest jump: 380 spots in 1902 (#1,136 → #756)
- Biggest drop: 378 spots in 1955 (#969 → #1,347)
- Debuted 1889
- Peaked 1933 at #420 (232 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 19 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 56 yrs · run 1902–1954
- Highest: 1 in 4,345 girls born in 1933 were named Elouise (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,672 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 21.0% of all girls named Elouise (2,389) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #1,279 (1889) | #1,279 |
| 1890s | 33 | #1,167 (1897) | #1,310 |
| 1900s | 232 | #637 (1907) | #799 |
| 1910s | 1,081 | #477 (1919) | #593 |
| 1920s | 2,389 | #425 (1925) | #444 |
| 1930s | 2,048 | #420 (1933) | #459 |
| 1940s | 1,678 | #513 (1941) | #596 |
| 1950s | 942 | #738 (1950) | #1,052 |
| 1960s | 295 | #1,597 (1960) | #2,532 |
| 1970s | 93 | #3,577 (1970) | #6,347 |
| 1980s | 52 | #5,885 (1981) | #7,266 |
| 1990s | 26 | #10,271 (1991) | #11,223 |
| 2000s | 72 | #6,544 (2009) | #11,397 |
| 2010s | 949 | #1,218 (2019) | #2,594 |
| 2020s | 1,503 | #788 (2025) | #1,039 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Elouise in 1922
Top girls' names in 1922
More about 1922
girls
1,201,003 girls got a published name in 1922; 1 in 5,386 of them was named Elouise, which outranked 92.1% of the 5,789 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).