Emerald
#741 for girls in 2025, 367 births · #3,513 for boys in 2025, 32 births
Given to girls 94.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 397 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,518since 1904
Emerald over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #741 | 367 | #3,513 | 32 |
| 2024 | #708 | 397 | #4,072 | 26 |
| 2023 | #745 | 377 | #4,886 | 20 |
| 2022 | #767 | 373 | #5,445 | 17 |
| 2021 | #904 | 299 | #4,936 | 19 |
| 2020 | #953 | 268 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #967 | 271 | #4,337 | 23 |
| 2018 | #1,026 | 252 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #975 | 269 | #6,060 | 14 |
| 2016 | #1,125 | 225 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #1,247 | 196 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #1,139 | 220 | #5,997 | 14 |
| 2013 | #1,281 | 184 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #1,523 | 145 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #1,671 | 126 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,696 | 124 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,444 | 161 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,589 | 143 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,335 | 174 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #1,265 | 177 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #1,249 | 174 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #1,160 | 186 | — | |
| 2002 | #995 | 221 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #961 | 226 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #966 | 219 | — | |
| 1999 | #905 | 233 | — | |
| 1998 | #812 | 262 | — | |
| 1997 | #930 | 213 | — | |
| 1996 | #843 | 236 | — | |
| 1995 | #853 | 229 | — | |
| 1994 | #766 | 268 | — | |
| 1993 | #943 | 200 | — | |
| 1992 | #917 | 213 | — | |
| 1991 | #962 | 196 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,088 | 162 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,057 | 161 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #1,118 | 137 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #1,257 | 112 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,304 | 102 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #1,439 | 87 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,368 | 86 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,665 | 66 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,531 | 77 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,674 | 68 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,440 | 39 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,304 | 41 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,267 | 23 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,854 | 12 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | — | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | — | |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #3,493 | 12 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #3,370 | 6 |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | — | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #2,609 | 8 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #4,001 | 5 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,589 | 10 | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #2,048 | 15 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #1,871 | 18 |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #2,731 | 12 | #2,459 | 12 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #2,152 | 14 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #2,423 | 11 |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 | #2,259 | 12 |
| 1915 | #2,255 | 13 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | #1,740 | 5 |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | — | |
| 1908 | — | #1,217 | 6 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Emerald! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1904–1908, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Emerald is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#449 · 1 in 1,604
- Oregon#661 · 1 in 3,127
- Alabama#797 · 1 in 4,003
- North Carolina#834 · 1 in 4,642
- Texas#1,105 · 1 in 6,944
Best ever in a state: #274 in New Mexico, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #449 | 5 | 1 in 1,604 |
| Oregon | #661 | 5 | 1 in 3,127 |
| Alabama | #797 | 5 | 1 in 4,003 |
| North Carolina | #834 | 10 | 1 in 4,642 |
| Texas | #1,105 | 24 | 1 in 6,944 |
| Georgia | #1,113 | 8 | 1 in 6,340 |
| California | #1,199 | 26 | 1 in 8,396 |
| Florida | #1,224 | 10 | 1 in 8,233 |
| Illinois | #1,483 | 6 | 1 in 10,540 |
| New York | #2,264 | 5 | 1 in 18,955 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emerald
- 33 spots since 2024 (#708 → #741)
- 212 spots since 2020 (#953 → #741)
- 506 spots since 2015 (#1,247 → #741)
- Biggest jump: 177 spots in 1994 (#943 → #766)
- Biggest drop: 165 spots in 2003 (#995 → #1,160)
- Debuted 1904
- Peaked 2024 at #708 (397 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 1991–2002
- Highest: 1 in 4,081 girls born in 2024 were named Emerald (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,379 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 23.2% of all girls named Emerald (2,212) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1960, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 17 | #1,763 (1909) | #1,857 |
| 1910s | 82 | #2,144 (1912) | #2,470 |
| 1920s | 78 | #2,731 (1920) | #3,536 |
| 1930s | 11 | #3,901 (1932) | #4,060 |
| 1940s | 29 | #4,007 (1947) | #4,497 |
| 1950s | 31 | #3,493 (1956) | #4,704 |
| 1960s | 42 | #4,539 (1963) | #5,580 |
| 1970s | 152 | #2,304 (1979) | #5,253 |
| 1980s | 935 | #1,057 (1989) | #1,485 |
| 1990s | 2,212 | #766 (1994) | #902 |
| 2000s | 1,836 | #961 (2001) | #1,245 |
| 2010s | 2,012 | #967 (2019) | #1,265 |
| 2020s | 2,081 | #708 (2024) | #803 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emerald in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 11,411 of them was named Emerald, which outranked 92.9% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,441Cayleigh162
- #1,441Ivette162
- #1,441Ryley162
- #1,444Emerald161
- #1,444Adamaris161
- #1,444Lela161
- #1,444Lourdes161
- #1,450Adrian160
- #1,450Alyse160
- #1,450Anaiah160
Tied with 5 names at #1,444; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.