Emile
Last seen for girls in 2018 at #13,793 · #2,091 for boys in 2025, 70 births
Given to boys 93.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1882 · 37 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,641since 1880
Emile over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,091 | 70 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,902 | 83 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,173 | 66 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,083 | 72 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,853 | 83 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,996 | 71 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,170 | 65 | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | #2,262 | 60 |
| 2017 | — | #2,091 | 66 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,228 | 60 | |
| 2015 | #10,866 | 9 | #2,355 | 55 |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | #2,429 | 52 |
| 2013 | — | #2,594 | 46 | |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #2,905 | 40 |
| 2011 | — | #3,164 | 35 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,377 | 32 | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #2,560 | 49 |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | #2,542 | 49 |
| 2007 | #8,098 | 15 | #2,868 | 41 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #3,153 | 34 |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #2,528 | 44 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | #2,697 | 39 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #2,847 | 34 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | #2,403 | 42 |
| 2001 | #8,196 | 12 | #2,797 | 33 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #2,864 | 31 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #3,182 | 25 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #2,394 | 36 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #2,903 | 26 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #2,747 | 27 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #1,955 | 43 |
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | #2,123 | 38 |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | #2,509 | 29 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #2,303 | 32 |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | #1,952 | 39 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #2,628 | 25 |
| 1989 | #6,160 | 13 | #2,690 | 23 |
| 1988 | #4,840 | 17 | #1,731 | 40 |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 | #1,896 | 33 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #2,360 | 23 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #1,794 | 33 |
| 1984 | #4,478 | 16 | #1,933 | 28 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #1,787 | 31 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #1,596 | 38 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #1,433 | 44 |
| 1980 | #4,517 | 16 | #1,655 | 35 |
| 1979 | — | #1,598 | 36 | |
| 1978 | #5,563 | 11 | #1,508 | 38 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #1,743 | 30 |
| 1976 | — | #1,427 | 39 | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #1,478 | 36 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #1,370 | 39 |
| 1973 | — | #1,400 | 36 | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #1,391 | 37 |
| 1971 | — | #1,254 | 44 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,080 | 57 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,252 | 40 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,083 | 47 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,150 | 42 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,131 | 43 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,064 | 48 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,016 | 55 | |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #1,005 | 57 |
| 1962 | — | #953 | 63 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #915 | 69 |
| 1960 | — | #1,021 | 56 | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #914 | 70 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #877 | 74 |
| 1957 | — | #1,063 | 51 | |
| 1956 | — | #849 | 78 | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #995 | 57 |
| 1954 | #3,967 | 9 | #933 | 63 |
| 1953 | — | #863 | 69 | |
| 1952 | — | #814 | 74 | |
| 1951 | — | #857 | 66 | |
| 1950 | — | #819 | 69 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #770 | 80 |
| 1948 | — | #744 | 82 | |
| 1947 | — | #663 | 108 | |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #777 | 73 |
| 1945 | — | #699 | 76 | |
| 1944 | — | #687 | 82 | |
| 1943 | — | #692 | 86 | |
| 1942 | — | #687 | 87 | |
| 1941 | — | #665 | 84 | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | #718 | 72 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #605 | 92 |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | #615 | 93 |
| 1937 | #2,940 | 9 | #637 | 85 |
| 1936 | — | #611 | 91 | |
| 1935 | — | #641 | 85 | |
| 1934 | — | #697 | 76 | |
| 1933 | — | #588 | 97 | |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #558 | 112 |
| 1931 | — | #532 | 119 | |
| 1930 | — | #546 | 121 | |
| 1929 | — | #557 | 112 | |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #554 | 121 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #522 | 137 |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #528 | 131 |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 | #516 | 140 |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #519 | 147 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 | #485 | 158 |
| 1922 | — | #478 | 167 | |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #476 | 165 |
| 1920 | #2,899 | 11 | #511 | 142 |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | #486 | 150 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #480 | 153 |
| 1917 | #2,879 | 10 | #490 | 138 |
| 1916 | #3,031 | 9 | #485 | 136 |
| 1915 | #3,795 | 6 | #492 | 127 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #438 | 121 |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #436 | 95 |
| 1912 | — | #450 | 76 | |
| 1911 | — | #385 | 54 | |
| 1910 | — | #407 | 43 | |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | #408 | 36 |
| 1908 | — | #413 | 33 | |
| 1907 | — | #486 | 23 | |
| 1906 | — | #489 | 21 | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | #370 | 31 |
| 1904 | — | #390 | 28 | |
| 1903 | — | #411 | 23 | |
| 1902 | — | #507 | 18 | |
| 1901 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1900 | — | #402 | 31 | |
| 1899 | — | #384 | 23 | |
| 1898 | — | #345 | 31 | |
| 1897 | — | #384 | 24 | |
| 1896 | — | #323 | 34 | |
| 1895 | — | #426 | 21 | |
| 1894 | — | #358 | 26 | |
| 1893 | — | #359 | 25 | |
| 1892 | — | #357 | 28 | |
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | #476 | 14 |
| 1890 | — | #389 | 21 | |
| 1889 | — | #338 | 27 | |
| 1888 | — | #404 | 21 | |
| 1887 | — | #356 | 21 | |
| 1886 | — | #336 | 25 | |
| 1885 | — | #411 | 19 | |
| 1884 | — | #331 | 28 | |
| 1883 | — | #346 | 23 | |
| 1882 | — | #283 | 37 | |
| 1881 | — | #375 | 20 | |
| 1880 | — | #526 | 12 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Emile was already there! It came in at #526, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 13 boys a year got the name.
Where Emile is popular in 1947
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Rhode Island#99 · 1 in 941
- Louisiana#137 · 1 in 740
- Connecticut#230 · 1 in 4,199
- Massachusetts#286 · 1 in 8,694
- Mississippi#383 · 1 in 4,859
Best ever in a state: #39 in New Hampshire, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #99 | 9 | 1 in 941 |
| Louisiana | #137 | 46 | 1 in 740 |
| Connecticut | #230 | 5 | 1 in 4,199 |
| Massachusetts | #286 | 6 | 1 in 8,694 |
| Mississippi | #383 | 6 | 1 in 4,859 |
| California | #696 | 6 | 1 in 19,906 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emile
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 189 spots since 2024 (#1,902 → #2,091)
- 95 spots since 2020 (#1,996 → #2,091)
- 264 spots since 2015 (#2,355 → #2,091)
- Biggest jump: 186 spots in 1958 (#1,063 → #877)
- Biggest drop: 214 spots in 1957 (#849 → #1,063)
Rise & fade · boys
2 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #283 (37 births)
- Births halved by 1891, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 81 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 81 yrs · run 1880–1956
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,073
- Highest: 1 in 3,073 boys born in 1882 were named Emile (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 24,401 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 16.4% of all boys named Emile (1,420) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 233 | #283 (1882) | #371 |
| 1890s | 247 | #323 (1896) | #380 |
| 1900s | 264 | #370 (1905) | #430 |
| 1910s | 1,093 | #385 (1911) | #455 |
| 1920s | 1,420 | #476 (1921) | #515 |
| 1930s | 971 | #532 (1931) | #603 |
| 1940s | 830 | #663 (1947) | #710 |
| 1950s | 671 | #814 (1952) | #898 |
| 1960s | 520 | #915 (1961) | #1,059 |
| 1970s | 392 | #1,080 (1970) | #1,425 |
| 1980s | 328 | #1,433 (1981) | #1,888 |
| 1990s | 320 | #1,952 (1991) | #2,470 |
| 2000s | 396 | #2,403 (2002) | #2,726 |
| 2010s | 511 | #2,091 (2017) | #2,558 |
| 2020s | 445 | #1,853 (2021) | #2,016 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emile in 1947
boys
#663
108 births · 1 in 16,941 boys
Top boys' names in 1947
More about 1947
boys
1,829,599 boys got a published name in 1947; 1 in 16,941 of them was named Emile, which outranked 84.5% of the 4,266 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).