Emilia
- #45 for girls in 2025, 4,677 births
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 4,854 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 9 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 69,076since 1880
Emilia over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #45 | 4,677 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #43 | 4,649 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #42 | 4,687 | #9,763 | 7 |
| 2022 | #44 | 4,685 | #8,300 | 9 |
| 2021 | #40 | 4,854 | — | |
| 2020 | #41 | 4,786 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #44 | 4,774 | #9,756 | 7 |
| 2018 | #58 | 4,040 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #77 | 3,596 | — | |
| 2016 | #103 | 3,033 | — | |
| 2015 | #145 | 2,225 | — | |
| 2014 | #164 | 2,004 | — | |
| 2013 | #205 | 1,564 | — | |
| 2012 | #268 | 1,213 | — | |
| 2011 | #325 | 972 | — | |
| 2010 | #348 | 927 | — | |
| 2009 | #399 | 789 | — | |
| 2008 | #401 | 804 | — | |
| 2007 | #420 | 781 | — | |
| 2006 | #420 | 759 | — | |
| 2005 | #434 | 711 | — | |
| 2004 | #468 | 631 | — | |
| 2003 | #514 | 557 | — | |
| 2002 | #544 | 506 | — | |
| 2001 | #614 | 408 | — | |
| 2000 | #624 | 402 | — | |
| 1999 | #758 | 292 | — | |
| 1998 | #855 | 249 | — | |
| 1997 | #861 | 237 | — | |
| 1996 | #879 | 224 | — | |
| 1995 | #889 | 213 | — | |
| 1994 | #905 | 211 | — | |
| 1993 | #979 | 190 | — | |
| 1992 | #933 | 208 | — | |
| 1991 | #960 | 197 | — | |
| 1990 | #981 | 188 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,067 | 158 | — | |
| 1988 | #986 | 167 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,156 | 127 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,194 | 118 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,219 | 113 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,035 | 137 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,084 | 127 | — | |
| 1982 | #958 | 155 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,017 | 142 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,161 | 116 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,503 | 78 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,397 | 83 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,440 | 77 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,252 | 89 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,439 | 72 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,532 | 63 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,527 | 61 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,627 | 55 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,473 | 69 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,330 | 79 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,402 | 68 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,291 | 73 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,281 | 71 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,189 | 81 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,366 | 65 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,229 | 80 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,361 | 66 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,266 | 76 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,305 | 72 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,354 | 66 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,358 | 62 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,448 | 54 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,344 | 62 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,141 | 82 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,197 | 70 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,206 | 69 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,130 | 74 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,156 | 67 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,031 | 81 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,145 | 65 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,077 | 69 | — | |
| 1948 | #993 | 77 | — | |
| 1947 | #926 | 92 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,042 | 66 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,060 | 54 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,005 | 60 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,006 | 62 | — | |
| 1942 | #928 | 71 | — | |
| 1941 | #845 | 74 | — | |
| 1940 | #879 | 66 | — | |
| 1939 | #848 | 68 | — | |
| 1938 | #840 | 71 | — | |
| 1937 | #804 | 73 | — | |
| 1936 | #909 | 56 | — | |
| 1935 | #861 | 64 | — | |
| 1934 | #680 | 96 | — | |
| 1933 | #736 | 80 | — | |
| 1932 | #724 | 86 | — | |
| 1931 | #728 | 85 | — | |
| 1930 | #634 | 119 | — | |
| 1929 | #678 | 107 | — | |
| 1928 | #664 | 111 | — | |
| 1927 | #651 | 123 | — | |
| 1926 | #662 | 119 | — | |
| 1925 | #639 | 130 | — | |
| 1924 | #628 | 143 | — | |
| 1923 | #649 | 129 | — | |
| 1922 | #665 | 119 | — | |
| 1921 | #667 | 122 | — | |
| 1920 | #698 | 109 | — | |
| 1919 | #660 | 112 | — | |
| 1918 | #653 | 117 | — | |
| 1917 | #624 | 120 | — | |
| 1916 | #638 | 112 | — | |
| 1915 | #599 | 119 | — | |
| 1914 | #608 | 88 | — | |
| 1913 | #519 | 96 | — | |
| 1912 | #722 | 48 | — | |
| 1911 | #667 | 42 | — | |
| 1910 | #663 | 41 | — | |
| 1909 | #541 | 49 | — | |
| 1908 | #567 | 43 | — | |
| 1907 | #507 | 50 | — | |
| 1906 | #570 | 38 | — | |
| 1905 | #609 | 33 | — | |
| 1904 | #600 | 32 | — | |
| 1903 | #496 | 41 | — | |
| 1902 | #623 | 28 | — | |
| 1901 | #645 | 24 | — | |
| 1900 | #556 | 38 | — | |
| 1899 | #550 | 30 | — | |
| 1898 | #666 | 24 | — | |
| 1897 | #567 | 28 | — | |
| 1896 | #635 | 24 | — | |
| 1895 | #622 | 24 | — | |
| 1894 | #535 | 29 | — | |
| 1893 | #630 | 21 | — | |
| 1892 | #638 | 20 | — | |
| 1891 | #608 | 19 | — | |
| 1890 | #599 | 19 | — | |
| 1889 | #600 | 18 | — | |
| 1888 | #525 | 23 | — | |
| 1887 | #733 | 10 | — | |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | — | |
| 1885 | #576 | 14 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #480 | 16 | — | |
| 1882 | #678 | 8 | — | |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 | — | |
| 1880 | #580 | 9 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Emilia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Emilia is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Illinois#21 · 1 in 207
- Arizona#22 · 1 in 188
- Colorado#26 · 1 in 208
- Delaware#27 · 1 in 133
- California#27 · 1 in 230
Best ever in a state: #14 in District of Columbia, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois | #21 | 214 | 1 in 207 |
| Arizona | #22 | 150 | 1 in 188 |
| Colorado | #26 | 112 | 1 in 208 |
| California | #27 | 704 | 1 in 230 |
| Delaware | #27 | 17 | 1 in 133 |
| Texas | #28 | 623 | 1 in 258 |
| Washington | #30 | 132 | 1 in 219 |
| Rhode Island | #31 | 18 | 1 in 136 |
| Wyoming | #31 | 8 | 1 in 101 |
| New Mexico | #33 | 25 | 1 in 187 |
| District of Columbia | #34 | 15 | 1 in 135 |
| New Jersey | #35 | 166 | 1 in 214 |
| New York | #36 | 296 | 1 in 265 |
| Connecticut | #37 | 62 | 1 in 186 |
| Florida | #37 | 322 | 1 in 269 |
| Massachusetts | #38 | 112 | 1 in 215 |
| Oregon | #38 | 59 | 1 in 221 |
| Maine | #45 | 17 | 1 in 183 |
| New Hampshire | #45 | 21 | 1 in 181 |
| Nevada | #46 | 39 | 1 in 236 |
| Alaska | #50 | 10 | 1 in 165 |
| Montana | #50 | 15 | 1 in 188 |
| North Carolina | #50 | 155 | 1 in 300 |
| Pennsylvania | #56 | 151 | 1 in 309 |
| Idaho | #58 | 28 | 1 in 256 |
| Georgia | #61 | 120 | 1 in 377 |
| Maryland | #65 | 55 | 1 in 363 |
| Utah | #66 | 56 | 1 in 305 |
| Michigan | #68 | 98 | 1 in 365 |
| South Carolina | #72 | 53 | 1 in 345 |
| Ohio | #73 | 122 | 1 in 387 |
| Virginia | #73 | 84 | 1 in 402 |
| Minnesota | #74 | 66 | 1 in 325 |
| Indiana | #75 | 75 | 1 in 372 |
| Vermont | #75 | 5 | 1 in 195 |
| Wisconsin | #75 | 59 | 1 in 343 |
| Nebraska | #87 | 23 | 1 in 309 |
| Tennessee | #89 | 79 | 1 in 406 |
| West Virginia | #100 | 15 | 1 in 338 |
| North Dakota | #101 | 9 | 1 in 300 |
| Alabama | #108 | 40 | 1 in 458 |
| Kansas | #108 | 29 | 1 in 407 |
| Missouri | #108 | 54 | 1 in 450 |
| Oklahoma | #110 | 32 | 1 in 462 |
| Iowa | #117 | 27 | 1 in 436 |
| Louisiana | #121 | 34 | 1 in 481 |
| Arkansas | #131 | 22 | 1 in 482 |
| South Dakota | #160 | 7 | 1 in 436 |
| Hawaii | #168 | 5 | 1 in 429 |
| Kentucky | #172 | 26 | 1 in 664 |
| Mississippi | #242 | 11 | 1 in 809 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emilia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 4 spots since 2020 (#41 → #45)
- 100 spots since 2015 (#145 → #45)
- Biggest jump: 208 spots in 1888
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 1935
Rise & fade · girls
141 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2021 at #40 (4,854 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 9 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Top 1,000: 103 yrs · run 1880–1942
Share of babies · girls
1 in 338
- Highest: 1 in 338 girls born in 2020 were named Emilia (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 344 girls born in 2025 (0.29%)
- Its best rank, #40 in 2021, was only 1 in 338 (0.30%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 41.0% of all girls named Emilia (28,338) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 133 | #480 (1883) | #601 |
| 1890s | 238 | #535 (1894) | #605 |
| 1900s | 376 | #496 (1903) | #571 |
| 1910s | 895 | #519 (1913) | #635 |
| 1920s | 1,212 | #628 (1924) | #660 |
| 1930s | 798 | #634 (1930) | #776 |
| 1940s | 691 | #845 (1941) | #976 |
| 1950s | 686 | #1,031 (1951) | #1,216 |
| 1960s | 718 | #1,189 (1966) | #1,304 |
| 1970s | 726 | #1,252 (1976) | #1,452 |
| 1980s | 1,360 | #958 (1982) | #1,088 |
| 1990s | 2,209 | #758 (1999) | #900 |
| 2000s | 6,348 | #399 (2009) | #484 |
| 2010s | 24,348 | #44 (2019) | #174 |
| 2020s | 28,338 | #40 (2021) | #43 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Emilia ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: