Emma

#3 for girls in 2025, 12,754 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2014 · 20,970 births
Debut · girls
2,003 births
In top 100 · girls
95 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
776,439
since 1880

Emma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201940peak #1, 2014girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#312,754#6,14314
2024#213,524#5,44317
2023#213,590#5,47017
2022#214,512#5,87415
2021#215,549#6,03214
2020#215,723#4,85519
2019#217,226#7,17311
2018#118,824#8,1549
2017#119,873#6,06014
2016#119,550#5,12418
2015#120,487#7,49110
2014#120,970#6,63212
2013#220,973#4,98118
2012#220,976#4,68620
2011#318,825#3,30633
2010#317,366#5,25117
2009#217,910#4,74820
2008#118,830#5,76715
2007#318,390#4,49321
2006#219,133#4,22322
2005#220,362#2,90236
2004#221,625#1,394102
2003#222,719#2,67437
2002#416,558#4,91915
2001#1313,327#5,14214
2000#1712,560#4,78515
1999#1711,751#4,16217
1998#2210,451#5,46611
1997#367,749#6,1009
1996#536,151#7,9716
1995#675,050#8,8685
1994#744,765#8,8005
1993#804,108#6,2288
1992#1043,212—
1991#1232,595—
1990#1302,420#5,3829
1989#1491,938#3,20518
1988#1601,795#4,16211
1987#1751,589#4,5739
1986#2091,259#6,7215
1985#263947—
1984#341678#4,9737
1983#398551#4,9077
1982#410560#6,3855
1981#412534—
1980#416530—
1979#428488#6,0565
1978#450442—
1977#423479—
1976#463414—
1975#422477—
1974#408490—
1973#447419#4,5056
1972#428453—
1971#442474#4,9075
1970#421529—
1969#426516—
1968#426494#4,1365
1967#385564—
1966#364619—
1965#359640—
1964#343770—
1963#352724#4,0485
1962#331798#3,0418
1961#307892—
1960#297976—
1959#2701,056#3,9885
1958#2661,084—
1957#2431,217#3,9935
1956#2261,340#3,2167
1955#2111,460#3,8865
1954#2021,530#3,1767
1953#1951,590#2,53110
1952#1801,709—
1951#1741,731—
1950#1541,896#3,6815
1949#1471,999#2,6069
1948#1382,099#3,3166
1947#1412,141#2,35611
1946#1312,070#2,40310
1945#1232,052#2,9966
1944#1182,247#1,98813
1943#1142,422#3,5385
1942#1082,606#1,73017
1941#992,546#1,90314
1940#942,606#1,43322
1939#892,685#1,71216
1938#962,670#1,61318
1937#892,750#1,62718
1936#852,831#1,80115
1935#892,802#1,53820
1934#852,940#1,29327
1933#753,152#1,23029
1932#763,330#1,65119
1931#763,307#1,42724
1930#733,555#1,55922
1929#693,803#1,52323
1928#674,017#1,70720
1927#644,327#1,51625
1926#594,480#1,56523
1925#574,714#1,80619
1924#574,897#1,62823
1923#534,977#1,69621
1922#505,013#2,04016
1921#525,072#2,50212
1920#465,238#2,76510
1919#455,087#2,38512
1918#465,324#1,76719
1917#465,121#1,98615
1916#415,217#1,77117
1915#405,044#1,37224
1914#393,972#1,97511
1913#383,474#1,67611
1912#353,357#1,61910
1911#352,616#1,2908
1910#342,607#72917
1909#342,338#1,4405
1908#302,357—
1907#272,356#81511
1906#282,224#9278
1905#262,298#1,0916
1904#222,312#68612
1903#232,308#73410
1902#182,514#68711
1901#172,374#7798
1900#133,095#51821
1899#132,445#66110
1898#132,788#8048
1897#102,698—
1896#102,872#67411
1895#102,952#60912
1894#92,937#52115
1893#92,968#50914
1892#73,128#59712
1891#52,884#49713
1890#52,980#45816
1889#52,884#62810
1888#43,087#46417
1887#42,647#46114
1886#32,764#57811
1885#32,728#49814
1884#32,587#6639
1883#32,367#7207
1882#32,303#7547
1881#32,034#5959
1880#32,003#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Emma was already there! It came in at #3, and was given to 2,003 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1966–1983, when fewer than 620 girls a year got the name.

Where Emma is popular in 1940

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNHWashington: #274 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,312 girlsWAIdaho: #112 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 475 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #167 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 886 girlsNDMinnesota: #359 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,540 girlsMNIllinois: #199 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,655 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #209 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,749 girlsMINew York: #210 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 1,602 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedRIOregon: #188 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,189 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNVWyoming: #100 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 331 girlsWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedSDIowa: #221 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,972 girlsIAIndiana: #122 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 689 girlsINOhio: #114 for girls · 86 births · 1 in 613 girlsOHPennsylvania: #126 for girls · 114 births · 1 in 658 girlsPANew Jersey: #141 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 833 girlsNJConnecticut: #216 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,130 girlsCTCalifornia: #216 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 1,349 girlsCAUtah: #175 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 834 girlsUTColorado: #138 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 568 girlsCONebraska: #187 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,321 girlsNEMissouri: #116 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 583 girlsMOKentucky: #50 for girls · 137 births · 1 in 209 girlsKYWest Virginia: #55 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 246 girlsWVVirginia: #62 for girls · 98 births · 1 in 252 girlsVAMaryland: #118 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 520 girlsMDDelaware: #60 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 199 girlsDEArizona: #114 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 404 girlsAZNew Mexico: #67 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 245 girlsNMKansas: #148 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 820 girlsKSArkansas: #30 for girls · 112 births · 1 in 171 girlsARTennessee: #43 for girls · 153 births · 1 in 184 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #42 for girls · 193 births · 1 in 195 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #31 for girls · 132 births · 1 in 166 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #172 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,022 girlsDCOklahoma: #85 for girls · 51 births · 1 in 395 girlsOKLouisiana: #50 for girls · 113 births · 1 in 207 girlsLAMississippi: #16 for girls · 201 births · 1 in 113 girlsMSAlabama: #27 for girls · 186 births · 1 in 159 girlsALGeorgia: #33 for girls · 177 births · 1 in 179 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedHITexas: #45 for girls · 240 births · 1 in 250 girlsTXFlorida: #39 for girls · 74 births · 1 in 200 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#16 · 1 in 113
  2. Alabama#27 · 1 in 159
  3. Arkansas#30 · 1 in 171
  4. South Carolina#31 · 1 in 166
  5. Georgia#33 · 1 in 179

Best ever in a state: #1 in Vermont, 2002.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#162011 in 113
Alabama#271861 in 159
Arkansas#301121 in 171
South Carolina#311321 in 166
Georgia#331771 in 179
Florida#39741 in 200
North Carolina#421931 in 195
Tennessee#431531 in 184
Texas#452401 in 250
Kentucky#501371 in 209
Louisiana#501131 in 207
West Virginia#55771 in 246
Delaware#6081 in 199
Virginia#62981 in 252
New Mexico#67241 in 245
Oklahoma#85511 in 395
Wyoming#10051 in 331
Idaho#11291 in 475
Arizona#114121 in 404
Ohio#114861 in 613
Missouri#116481 in 583
Maryland#118251 in 520
Indiana#122391 in 689
Pennsylvania#1261141 in 658
Colorado#138161 in 568
New Jersey#141311 in 833
Kansas#148151 in 820
North Dakota#16761 in 886
District of Columbia#17261 in 1,022
Utah#17561 in 834
Nebraska#18771 in 1,321
Oregon#18861 in 1,189
Illinois#199341 in 1,655
Michigan#209251 in 1,749
New York#210561 in 1,602
California#216371 in 1,349
Connecticut#21651 in 2,130
Iowa#221101 in 1,972
Washington#27451 in 2,312
Minnesota#35951 in 4,540
Alaska———
Hawaii———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Emma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#2 → #3)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#2 → #3)
  • 2 spots since 2015 (#1 → #3)
  • Biggest jump: 78 spots in 1985 (#341 → #263)
  • Biggest drop: 41 spots in 1968 (#385 → #426)
Rise & fade · girls
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #1 (20,970 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: 42 yrs · run 2002–2025
  • Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1880–1941
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1881 were named Emma (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
  • Its best rank, #1 in 2014, was only 1 in 85 (1.2%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 25.1% of all girls named Emma (195,070) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #3 (1886) → #463 (1976) → #1 (2014)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s25,404#3 (1886)#3
1890s28,652#5 (1890)#9
1900s24,176#13 (1900)#24
1910s41,819#34 (1910)#40
1920s46,538#46 (1920)#57
1930s30,022#73 (1930)#83
1940s22,788#94 (1940)#121
1950s14,613#154 (1950)#212
1960s6,993#297 (1960)#359
1970s4,665#408 (1974)#433
1980s10,381#149 (1989)#293
1990s58,252#17 (1999)#71
2000s181,414#1 (2008)#5
2010s195,070#1 (2014)#2
2020s85,652#2 (2020)#2

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Emma in 1940

girls
#94
2,606 births · 1 in 439 girls
boys
#1,433
22 births · 1 in 52,690 boys

Top girls' names in 1940

  1. #1Mary56,216
  2. #2Barbara36,736
  3. #3Patricia32,665
  4. #4Judith22,385
  5. #5Betty22,077
  6. #6Carol21,759
  7. #7Nancy19,737
  8. #8Linda18,370
  9. #9Shirley17,881
  10. #10Sandra16,153
  11. #94Emma2,606

Top boys' names in 1940

  1. #1James62,481
  2. #2Robert61,198
  3. #3John54,786
  4. #4William44,779
  5. #5Richard37,425
  6. #6Charles31,689
  7. #7David27,690
  8. #8Thomas23,991
  9. #9Donald23,115
  10. #10Ronald20,741
  11. #1,433Emma22
More about 1940

girls

1,143,528 girls got a published name in 1940; 1 in 439 of them was named Emma, which outranked 98.1% of the 5,028 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #91Julia2,709
  2. #91Katherine2,709
  3. #93Wilma2,621
  4. #94Emma2,606
  5. #95Lorraine2,579
  6. #96Rebecca2,555
  7. #97Lillian2,525
Biggest movers since 1939
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,494Scarlett#3,429 → #935
  2. ↑ 1,465Lonna#2,206 → #741
  3. ↑ 834Pam#1,797 → #963
  4. ↑ 659Jody#1,638 → #979
  5. ↑ 633Laraine#1,474 → #841
Fallers
  1. ↓ 481Fredia#996 → #1,477
  2. ↓ 430Eleanora#974 → #1,404
  3. ↓ 375Danielle#811 → #1,186
  4. ↓ 342Eloisa#930 → #1,272
  5. ↓ 298Coral#996 → #1,294

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,159,172 boys got a published name in 1940; 1 in 52,690 of them was named Emma, which outranked 63.6% of the 3,937 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #1,397Vic23
  2. #1,397Washington23
  3. #1,397Xavier23
  4. #1,433Emma22
  5. #1,433Algie22
  6. #1,433Ansel22
  7. #1,433Anson22
  8. #1,471Ace21
  9. #1,471Adolf21
  10. #1,471Adrain21

Tied with 37 names at #1,433; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1939
Risers
  1. ↑ 565Whitney#1,458 → #893
  2. ↑ 447Gonzalo#1,297 → #850
  3. ↑ 419Weston#1,323 → #904
  4. ↑ 368Ashley#1,272 → #904
  5. ↑ 366Agustin#1,238 → #872
Fallers
  1. ↓ 886Montie#916 → #1,802
  2. ↓ 446Verlon#888 → #1,334
  3. ↓ 394Issac#857 → #1,251
  4. ↓ 392Otho#942 → #1,334
  5. ↓ 384Pearl#867 → #1,251

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1940 →