Emma

#3 for girls in 2025, 12,754 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2014 · 20,970 births
Debut · girls
2,003 births
In top 100 · girls
95 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
776,439
since 1880

Emma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201945peak #1, 2014girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#312,754#6,14314
2024#213,524#5,44317
2023#213,590#5,47017
2022#214,512#5,87415
2021#215,549#6,03214
2020#215,723#4,85519
2019#217,226#7,17311
2018#118,824#8,1549
2017#119,873#6,06014
2016#119,550#5,12418
2015#120,487#7,49110
2014#120,970#6,63212
2013#220,973#4,98118
2012#220,976#4,68620
2011#318,825#3,30633
2010#317,366#5,25117
2009#217,910#4,74820
2008#118,830#5,76715
2007#318,390#4,49321
2006#219,133#4,22322
2005#220,362#2,90236
2004#221,625#1,394102
2003#222,719#2,67437
2002#416,558#4,91915
2001#1313,327#5,14214
2000#1712,560#4,78515
1999#1711,751#4,16217
1998#2210,451#5,46611
1997#367,749#6,1009
1996#536,151#7,9716
1995#675,050#8,8685
1994#744,765#8,8005
1993#804,108#6,2288
1992#1043,212—
1991#1232,595—
1990#1302,420#5,3829
1989#1491,938#3,20518
1988#1601,795#4,16211
1987#1751,589#4,5739
1986#2091,259#6,7215
1985#263947—
1984#341678#4,9737
1983#398551#4,9077
1982#410560#6,3855
1981#412534—
1980#416530—
1979#428488#6,0565
1978#450442—
1977#423479—
1976#463414—
1975#422477—
1974#408490—
1973#447419#4,5056
1972#428453—
1971#442474#4,9075
1970#421529—
1969#426516—
1968#426494#4,1365
1967#385564—
1966#364619—
1965#359640—
1964#343770—
1963#352724#4,0485
1962#331798#3,0418
1961#307892—
1960#297976—
1959#2701,056#3,9885
1958#2661,084—
1957#2431,217#3,9935
1956#2261,340#3,2167
1955#2111,460#3,8865
1954#2021,530#3,1767
1953#1951,590#2,53110
1952#1801,709—
1951#1741,731—
1950#1541,896#3,6815
1949#1471,999#2,6069
1948#1382,099#3,3166
1947#1412,141#2,35611
1946#1312,070#2,40310
1945#1232,052#2,9966
1944#1182,247#1,98813
1943#1142,422#3,5385
1942#1082,606#1,73017
1941#992,546#1,90314
1940#942,606#1,43322
1939#892,685#1,71216
1938#962,670#1,61318
1937#892,750#1,62718
1936#852,831#1,80115
1935#892,802#1,53820
1934#852,940#1,29327
1933#753,152#1,23029
1932#763,330#1,65119
1931#763,307#1,42724
1930#733,555#1,55922
1929#693,803#1,52323
1928#674,017#1,70720
1927#644,327#1,51625
1926#594,480#1,56523
1925#574,714#1,80619
1924#574,897#1,62823
1923#534,977#1,69621
1922#505,013#2,04016
1921#525,072#2,50212
1920#465,238#2,76510
1919#455,087#2,38512
1918#465,324#1,76719
1917#465,121#1,98615
1916#415,217#1,77117
1915#405,044#1,37224
1914#393,972#1,97511
1913#383,474#1,67611
1912#353,357#1,61910
1911#352,616#1,2908
1910#342,607#72917
1909#342,338#1,4405
1908#302,357—
1907#272,356#81511
1906#282,224#9278
1905#262,298#1,0916
1904#222,312#68612
1903#232,308#73410
1902#182,514#68711
1901#172,374#7798
1900#133,095#51821
1899#132,445#66110
1898#132,788#8048
1897#102,698—
1896#102,872#67411
1895#102,952#60912
1894#92,937#52115
1893#92,968#50914
1892#73,128#59712
1891#52,884#49713
1890#52,980#45816
1889#52,884#62810
1888#43,087#46417
1887#42,647#46114
1886#32,764#57811
1885#32,728#49814
1884#32,587#6639
1883#32,367#7207
1882#32,303#7547
1881#32,034#5959
1880#32,003#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Emma was already there! It came in at #3, and was given to 2,003 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1966–1983, when fewer than 620 girls a year got the name.

Where Emma is popular in 1945

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNHWashington: #261 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,123 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #225 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,922 girlsILWisconsin: #289 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,789 girlsWIMichigan: #208 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,719 girlsMINew York: #290 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 2,777 girlsNYMassachusetts: #332 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,962 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedRIOregon: #144 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 755 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #107 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 616 girlsINOhio: #165 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 1,127 girlsOHPennsylvania: #157 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 1,015 girlsPANew Jersey: #173 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,150 girlsNJConnecticut: #241 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,350 girlsCTCalifornia: #269 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 1,942 girlsCAUtah: #195 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,037 girlsUTColorado: #235 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,465 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #126 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 747 girlsMOKentucky: #62 for girls · 95 births · 1 in 283 girlsKYWest Virginia: #71 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 380 girlsWVVirginia: #81 for girls · 76 births · 1 in 377 girlsVAMaryland: #121 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 584 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDEArizona: #130 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 506 girlsAZNew Mexico: #94 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 323 girlsNMKansas: #169 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,052 girlsKSArkansas: #49 for girls · 79 births · 1 in 232 girlsARTennessee: #56 for girls · 104 births · 1 in 287 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #55 for girls · 141 births · 1 in 288 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #41 for girls · 121 births · 1 in 193 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #142 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 725 girlsDCOklahoma: #120 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 662 girlsOKLouisiana: #66 for girls · 97 births · 1 in 265 girlsLAMississippi: #30 for girls · 149 births · 1 in 156 girlsMSAlabama: #46 for girls · 135 births · 1 in 231 girlsALGeorgia: #41 for girls · 161 births · 1 in 214 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedHITexas: #83 for girls · 192 births · 1 in 376 girlsTXFlorida: #82 for girls · 61 births · 1 in 368 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#30 · 1 in 156
  2. South Carolina#41 · 1 in 193
  3. Georgia#41 · 1 in 214
  4. Alabama#46 · 1 in 231
  5. Arkansas#49 · 1 in 232

Best ever in a state: #1 in Vermont, 2002.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#301491 in 156
Georgia#411611 in 214
South Carolina#411211 in 193
Alabama#461351 in 231
Arkansas#49791 in 232
North Carolina#551411 in 288
Tennessee#561041 in 287
Kentucky#62951 in 283
Louisiana#66971 in 265
West Virginia#71461 in 380
Virginia#81761 in 377
Florida#82611 in 368
Texas#831921 in 376
New Mexico#94191 in 323
Indiana#107481 in 616
Oklahoma#120281 in 662
Maryland#121301 in 584
Missouri#126401 in 747
Arizona#130121 in 506
District of Columbia#142131 in 725
Oregon#144131 in 755
Pennsylvania#157771 in 1,015
Ohio#165531 in 1,127
Kansas#169131 in 1,052
New Jersey#173291 in 1,150
Utah#19561 in 1,037
Michigan#208291 in 1,719
Illinois#225321 in 1,922
Colorado#23571 in 1,465
Connecticut#24161 in 2,350
Washington#26191 in 2,123
California#269431 in 1,942
Wisconsin#28971 in 3,789
New York#290391 in 2,777
Massachusetts#33271 in 4,962
Alaska———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Emma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#2 → #3)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#2 → #3)
  • 2 spots since 2015 (#1 → #3)
  • Biggest jump: 78 spots in 1985 (#341 → #263)
  • Biggest drop: 41 spots in 1968 (#385 → #426)
Rise & fade · girls
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #1 (20,970 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: 42 yrs · run 2002–2025
  • Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1880–1941
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1881 were named Emma (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
  • Its best rank, #1 in 2014, was only 1 in 85 (1.2%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 25.1% of all girls named Emma (195,070) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #3 (1886) → #463 (1976) → #1 (2014)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s25,404#3 (1886)#3
1890s28,652#5 (1890)#9
1900s24,176#13 (1900)#24
1910s41,819#34 (1910)#40
1920s46,538#46 (1920)#57
1930s30,022#73 (1930)#83
1940s22,788#94 (1940)#121
1950s14,613#154 (1950)#212
1960s6,993#297 (1960)#359
1970s4,665#408 (1974)#433
1980s10,381#149 (1989)#293
1990s58,252#17 (1999)#71
2000s181,414#1 (2008)#5
2010s195,070#1 (2014)#2
2020s85,652#2 (2020)#2

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Emma in 1945

girls
#123
2,052 births · 1 in 637 girls
boys
#2,996
6 births · 1 in 224,309 boys

Top girls' names in 1945

  1. #1Mary59,278
  2. #2Linda41,465
  3. #3Barbara38,273
  4. #4Patricia35,844
  5. #5Carol30,389
  6. #6Sandra24,700
  7. #7Nancy21,456
  8. #8Sharon20,838
  9. #9Judith20,192
  10. #10Susan19,222
  11. #123Emma2,052

Top boys' names in 1945

  1. #1James74,464
  2. #2Robert69,947
  3. #3John66,117
  4. #4William50,218
  5. #5Richard46,046
  6. #6David37,110
  7. #7Charles32,469
  8. #8Thomas31,874
  9. #9Michael29,902
  10. #10Ronald23,665
  11. #2,996Emma6
More about 1945

girls

1,307,090 girls got a published name in 1945; 1 in 637 of them was named Emma, which outranked 97.7% of the 5,242 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #120Josephine2,146
  2. #121June2,071
  3. #122Jeanette2,053
  4. #123Emma2,052
  5. #124Lillian2,017
  6. #125Pauline1,975
  7. #126Andrea1,934
Biggest movers since 1944
Risers
  1. ↑ 799Lauren#1,153 → #354
  2. ↑ 707Amber#1,661 → #954
  3. ↑ 648Laureen#1,315 → #667
  4. ↑ 630Deidre#1,609 → #979
  5. ↑ 623Candice#1,364 → #741
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Bernardine#937 → #1,332
  2. ↓ 386Joella#988 → #1,374
  3. ↓ 342Venita#937 → #1,279
  4. ↓ 275Magdalene#867 → #1,142
  5. ↓ 249Alpha#964 → #1,213

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,345,855 boys got a published name in 1945; 1 in 224,309 of them was named Emma, which outranked 20.8% of the 3,783 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #2,743Wm7
  2. #2,743Zan7
  3. #2,743Zeno7
  4. #2,996Emma6
  5. #2,996Afton6
  6. #2,996Albertus6
  7. #2,996Alexandro6
  8. #3,338Add5
  9. #3,338Addis5
  10. #3,338Adelaido5

Tied with 341 names at #2,996; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1944
Risers
  1. ↑ 527Delano#1,085 → #558
  2. ↑ 499Dane#1,235 → #736
  3. ↑ 385Eusebio#1,328 → #943
  4. ↑ 371Erick#1,235 → #864
  5. ↑ 311Gerardo#1,282 → #971
Fallers
  1. ↓ 479Joan#870 → #1,349
  2. ↓ 408Kit#841 → #1,249
  3. ↓ 392Llewellyn#935 → #1,327
  4. ↓ 361Valentine#888 → #1,249
  5. ↓ 321Hilario#906 → #1,227

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1945 →