Emma

#3 for girls in 2025, 12,754 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2014 · 20,970 births
Debut · girls
2,003 births
In top 100 · girls
95 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
776,439
since 1880

Emma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201958peak #1, 2014girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#312,754#6,14314
2024#213,524#5,44317
2023#213,590#5,47017
2022#214,512#5,87415
2021#215,549#6,03214
2020#215,723#4,85519
2019#217,226#7,17311
2018#118,824#8,1549
2017#119,873#6,06014
2016#119,550#5,12418
2015#120,487#7,49110
2014#120,970#6,63212
2013#220,973#4,98118
2012#220,976#4,68620
2011#318,825#3,30633
2010#317,366#5,25117
2009#217,910#4,74820
2008#118,830#5,76715
2007#318,390#4,49321
2006#219,133#4,22322
2005#220,362#2,90236
2004#221,625#1,394102
2003#222,719#2,67437
2002#416,558#4,91915
2001#1313,327#5,14214
2000#1712,560#4,78515
1999#1711,751#4,16217
1998#2210,451#5,46611
1997#367,749#6,1009
1996#536,151#7,9716
1995#675,050#8,8685
1994#744,765#8,8005
1993#804,108#6,2288
1992#1043,212—
1991#1232,595—
1990#1302,420#5,3829
1989#1491,938#3,20518
1988#1601,795#4,16211
1987#1751,589#4,5739
1986#2091,259#6,7215
1985#263947—
1984#341678#4,9737
1983#398551#4,9077
1982#410560#6,3855
1981#412534—
1980#416530—
1979#428488#6,0565
1978#450442—
1977#423479—
1976#463414—
1975#422477—
1974#408490—
1973#447419#4,5056
1972#428453—
1971#442474#4,9075
1970#421529—
1969#426516—
1968#426494#4,1365
1967#385564—
1966#364619—
1965#359640—
1964#343770—
1963#352724#4,0485
1962#331798#3,0418
1961#307892—
1960#297976—
1959#2701,056#3,9885
1958#2661,084—
1957#2431,217#3,9935
1956#2261,340#3,2167
1955#2111,460#3,8865
1954#2021,530#3,1767
1953#1951,590#2,53110
1952#1801,709—
1951#1741,731—
1950#1541,896#3,6815
1949#1471,999#2,6069
1948#1382,099#3,3166
1947#1412,141#2,35611
1946#1312,070#2,40310
1945#1232,052#2,9966
1944#1182,247#1,98813
1943#1142,422#3,5385
1942#1082,606#1,73017
1941#992,546#1,90314
1940#942,606#1,43322
1939#892,685#1,71216
1938#962,670#1,61318
1937#892,750#1,62718
1936#852,831#1,80115
1935#892,802#1,53820
1934#852,940#1,29327
1933#753,152#1,23029
1932#763,330#1,65119
1931#763,307#1,42724
1930#733,555#1,55922
1929#693,803#1,52323
1928#674,017#1,70720
1927#644,327#1,51625
1926#594,480#1,56523
1925#574,714#1,80619
1924#574,897#1,62823
1923#534,977#1,69621
1922#505,013#2,04016
1921#525,072#2,50212
1920#465,238#2,76510
1919#455,087#2,38512
1918#465,324#1,76719
1917#465,121#1,98615
1916#415,217#1,77117
1915#405,044#1,37224
1914#393,972#1,97511
1913#383,474#1,67611
1912#353,357#1,61910
1911#352,616#1,2908
1910#342,607#72917
1909#342,338#1,4405
1908#302,357—
1907#272,356#81511
1906#282,224#9278
1905#262,298#1,0916
1904#222,312#68612
1903#232,308#73410
1902#182,514#68711
1901#172,374#7798
1900#133,095#51821
1899#132,445#66110
1898#132,788#8048
1897#102,698—
1896#102,872#67411
1895#102,952#60912
1894#92,937#52115
1893#92,968#50914
1892#73,128#59712
1891#52,884#49713
1890#52,980#45816
1889#52,884#62810
1888#43,087#46417
1887#42,647#46114
1886#32,764#57811
1885#32,728#49814
1884#32,587#6639
1883#32,367#7207
1882#32,303#7547
1881#32,034#5959
1880#32,003#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Emma was already there! It came in at #3, and was given to 2,003 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1966–1983, when fewer than 620 girls a year got the name.

Where Emma is popular in 1958

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #108 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 358 girlsAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNHWashington: #384 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,163 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #392 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 3,794 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #355 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 3,406 girlsMINew York: #372 for girls · 50 births · 1 in 3,393 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #304 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,402 girlsINOhio: #282 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 2,226 girlsOHPennsylvania: #307 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 2,634 girlsPANew Jersey: #289 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 2,394 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #414 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 3,395 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #313 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,783 girlsMOKentucky: #219 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,431 girlsKYWest Virginia: #190 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,137 girlsWVVirginia: #227 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 1,459 girlsVAMaryland: #261 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,001 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDEArizona: #220 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 936 girlsAZNew Mexico: #222 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 959 girlsNMKansas: #286 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,105 girlsKSArkansas: #136 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 689 girlsARTennessee: #164 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 940 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #157 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 794 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #112 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 497 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #262 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,777 girlsOKLouisiana: #172 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 893 girlsLAMississippi: #79 for girls · 80 births · 1 in 316 girlsMSAlabama: #113 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 562 girlsALGeorgia: #132 for girls · 72 births · 1 in 627 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedHITexas: #212 for girls · 107 births · 1 in 1,049 girlsTXFlorida: #215 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 1,283 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#79 · 1 in 316
  2. Alaska#108 · 1 in 358
  3. South Carolina#112 · 1 in 497
  4. Alabama#113 · 1 in 562
  5. Georgia#132 · 1 in 627

Best ever in a state: #1 in Vermont, 2002.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#79801 in 316
Alaska#10871 in 358
South Carolina#112541 in 497
Alabama#113641 in 562
Georgia#132721 in 627
Arkansas#136261 in 689
North Carolina#157621 in 794
Tennessee#164391 in 940
Louisiana#172441 in 893
West Virginia#190171 in 1,137
Texas#2121071 in 1,049
Florida#215371 in 1,283
Kentucky#219231 in 1,431
Arizona#220151 in 936
New Mexico#222121 in 959
Virginia#227281 in 1,459
Maryland#261151 in 2,001
Oklahoma#262121 in 1,777
Ohio#282481 in 2,226
Kansas#286101 in 2,105
New Jersey#289241 in 2,394
Indiana#304211 in 2,402
Pennsylvania#307441 in 2,634
Missouri#313161 in 2,783
Michigan#355271 in 3,406
New York#372501 in 3,393
Washington#38491 in 3,163
Illinois#392281 in 3,794
California#414481 in 3,395
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Emma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#2 → #3)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#2 → #3)
  • 2 spots since 2015 (#1 → #3)
  • Biggest jump: 78 spots in 1985 (#341 → #263)
  • Biggest drop: 41 spots in 1968 (#385 → #426)
Rise & fade · girls
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #1 (20,970 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: 42 yrs · run 2002–2025
  • Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1880–1941
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1881 were named Emma (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
  • Its best rank, #1 in 2014, was only 1 in 85 (1.2%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 25.1% of all girls named Emma (195,070) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #3 (1886) → #463 (1976) → #1 (2014)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s25,404#3 (1886)#3
1890s28,652#5 (1890)#9
1900s24,176#13 (1900)#24
1910s41,819#34 (1910)#40
1920s46,538#46 (1920)#57
1930s30,022#73 (1930)#83
1940s22,788#94 (1940)#121
1950s14,613#154 (1950)#212
1960s6,993#297 (1960)#359
1970s4,665#408 (1974)#433
1980s10,381#149 (1989)#293
1990s58,252#17 (1999)#71
2000s181,414#1 (2008)#5
2010s195,070#1 (2014)#2
2020s85,652#2 (2020)#2

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Emma in 1958

girls
#266
1,084 births · 1 in 1,856 girls

Top girls' names in 1958

  1. #1Mary55,848
  2. #2Susan45,175
  3. #3Linda41,904
  4. #4Karen38,487
  5. #5Patricia37,961
  6. #6Debra35,521
  7. #7Deborah32,943
  8. #8Cynthia31,014
  9. #9Barbara27,874
  10. #10Donna26,959
  11. #266Emma1,084
More about 1958

girls

2,011,619 girls got a published name in 1958; 1 in 1,856 of them was named Emma, which outranked 96.2% of the 7,030 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #263Georgia1,112
  2. #264Jacquelyn1,109
  3. #265Mona1,090
  4. #266Emma1,084
  5. #267Kristine1,082
  6. #268Paulette1,068
  7. #269Jeannie1,065
Biggest movers since 1957
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,133Brigitte#1,904 → #771
  2. ↑ 760Samantha#1,754 → #994
  3. ↑ 709Selena#1,388 → #679
  4. ↑ 672Tambra#1,588 → #916
  5. ↑ 570Bridgette#1,274 → #704
Fallers
  1. ↓ 312Sarita#970 → #1,282
  2. ↓ 311Beryl#910 → #1,221
  3. ↓ 309Sherree#827 → #1,136
  4. ↓ 275Winnie#965 → #1,240
  5. ↓ 236Jacalyn#975 → #1,211

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1958 →