Emma

#3 for girls in 2025, 12,754 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2014 · 20,970 births
Debut · girls
2,003 births
In top 100 · girls
95 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
776,439
since 1880

Emma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201967peak #1, 2014girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#312,754#6,14314
2024#213,524#5,44317
2023#213,590#5,47017
2022#214,512#5,87415
2021#215,549#6,03214
2020#215,723#4,85519
2019#217,226#7,17311
2018#118,824#8,1549
2017#119,873#6,06014
2016#119,550#5,12418
2015#120,487#7,49110
2014#120,970#6,63212
2013#220,973#4,98118
2012#220,976#4,68620
2011#318,825#3,30633
2010#317,366#5,25117
2009#217,910#4,74820
2008#118,830#5,76715
2007#318,390#4,49321
2006#219,133#4,22322
2005#220,362#2,90236
2004#221,625#1,394102
2003#222,719#2,67437
2002#416,558#4,91915
2001#1313,327#5,14214
2000#1712,560#4,78515
1999#1711,751#4,16217
1998#2210,451#5,46611
1997#367,749#6,1009
1996#536,151#7,9716
1995#675,050#8,8685
1994#744,765#8,8005
1993#804,108#6,2288
1992#1043,212—
1991#1232,595—
1990#1302,420#5,3829
1989#1491,938#3,20518
1988#1601,795#4,16211
1987#1751,589#4,5739
1986#2091,259#6,7215
1985#263947—
1984#341678#4,9737
1983#398551#4,9077
1982#410560#6,3855
1981#412534—
1980#416530—
1979#428488#6,0565
1978#450442—
1977#423479—
1976#463414—
1975#422477—
1974#408490—
1973#447419#4,5056
1972#428453—
1971#442474#4,9075
1970#421529—
1969#426516—
1968#426494#4,1365
1967#385564—
1966#364619—
1965#359640—
1964#343770—
1963#352724#4,0485
1962#331798#3,0418
1961#307892—
1960#297976—
1959#2701,056#3,9885
1958#2661,084—
1957#2431,217#3,9935
1956#2261,340#3,2167
1955#2111,460#3,8865
1954#2021,530#3,1767
1953#1951,590#2,53110
1952#1801,709—
1951#1741,731—
1950#1541,896#3,6815
1949#1471,999#2,6069
1948#1382,099#3,3166
1947#1412,141#2,35611
1946#1312,070#2,40310
1945#1232,052#2,9966
1944#1182,247#1,98813
1943#1142,422#3,5385
1942#1082,606#1,73017
1941#992,546#1,90314
1940#942,606#1,43322
1939#892,685#1,71216
1938#962,670#1,61318
1937#892,750#1,62718
1936#852,831#1,80115
1935#892,802#1,53820
1934#852,940#1,29327
1933#753,152#1,23029
1932#763,330#1,65119
1931#763,307#1,42724
1930#733,555#1,55922
1929#693,803#1,52323
1928#674,017#1,70720
1927#644,327#1,51625
1926#594,480#1,56523
1925#574,714#1,80619
1924#574,897#1,62823
1923#534,977#1,69621
1922#505,013#2,04016
1921#525,072#2,50212
1920#465,238#2,76510
1919#455,087#2,38512
1918#465,324#1,76719
1917#465,121#1,98615
1916#415,217#1,77117
1915#405,044#1,37224
1914#393,972#1,97511
1913#383,474#1,67611
1912#353,357#1,61910
1911#352,616#1,2908
1910#342,607#72917
1909#342,338#1,4405
1908#302,357—
1907#272,356#81511
1906#282,224#9278
1905#262,298#1,0916
1904#222,312#68612
1903#232,308#73410
1902#182,514#68711
1901#172,374#7798
1900#133,095#51821
1899#132,445#66110
1898#132,788#8048
1897#102,698—
1896#102,872#67411
1895#102,952#60912
1894#92,937#52115
1893#92,968#50914
1892#73,128#59712
1891#52,884#49713
1890#52,980#45816
1889#52,884#62810
1888#43,087#46417
1887#42,647#46114
1886#32,764#57811
1885#32,728#49814
1884#32,587#6639
1883#32,367#7207
1882#32,303#7547
1881#32,034#5959
1880#32,003#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Emma was already there! It came in at #3, and was given to 2,003 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1966–1983, when fewer than 620 girls a year got the name.

Where Emma is popular in 1967

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #432 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 3,561 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #520 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 5,938 girlsMINew York: #486 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 4,227 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #368 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,910 girlsINOhio: #416 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,760 girlsOHPennsylvania: #373 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,285 girlsPANew Jersey: #438 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,818 girlsNJConnecticut: #396 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,475 girlsCTCalifornia: #451 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 3,186 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedUTColorado: #387 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,540 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #420 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,723 girlsMOKentucky: #283 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,050 girlsKYWest Virginia: #229 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,370 girlsWVVirginia: #279 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,762 girlsVAMaryland: #371 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,865 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #326 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,617 girlsNMKansas: #312 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,932 girlsKSArkansas: #244 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,345 girlsARTennessee: #296 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,137 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #225 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,313 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #206 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,079 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #378 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,598 girlsOKLouisiana: #300 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,734 girlsLAMississippi: #191 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 934 girlsMSAlabama: #253 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,407 girlsALGeorgia: #224 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,229 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedHITexas: #292 for girls · 58 births · 1 in 1,585 girlsTXFlorida: #276 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,534 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#191 · 1 in 934
  2. South Carolina#206 · 1 in 1,079
  3. Georgia#224 · 1 in 1,229
  4. North Carolina#225 · 1 in 1,313
  5. West Virginia#229 · 1 in 1,370

Best ever in a state: #1 in Vermont, 2002.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#191201 in 934
South Carolina#206191 in 1,079
Georgia#224301 in 1,229
North Carolina#225301 in 1,313
West Virginia#22991 in 1,370
Arkansas#244101 in 1,345
Alabama#253191 in 1,407
Florida#276271 in 1,534
Virginia#279191 in 1,762
Kentucky#283121 in 2,050
Texas#292581 in 1,585
Tennessee#296141 in 2,137
Louisiana#300181 in 1,734
Kansas#31271 in 1,932
New Mexico#32651 in 1,617
Indiana#368141 in 2,910
Maryland#37191 in 2,865
Pennsylvania#373261 in 3,285
Oklahoma#37861 in 2,598
Colorado#38761 in 2,540
Connecticut#39661 in 3,475
Ohio#416221 in 3,760
Missouri#42091 in 3,723
Illinois#432241 in 3,561
New Jersey#438131 in 3,818
California#451481 in 3,186
New York#486331 in 4,227
Michigan#520121 in 5,938
Alaska———
Arizona———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Emma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#2 → #3)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#2 → #3)
  • 2 spots since 2015 (#1 → #3)
  • Biggest jump: 78 spots in 1985 (#341 → #263)
  • Biggest drop: 41 spots in 1968 (#385 → #426)
Rise & fade · girls
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #1 (20,970 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: 42 yrs · run 2002–2025
  • Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1880–1941
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1881 were named Emma (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
  • Its best rank, #1 in 2014, was only 1 in 85 (1.2%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 25.1% of all girls named Emma (195,070) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #3 (1886) → #463 (1976) → #1 (2014)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s25,404#3 (1886)#3
1890s28,652#5 (1890)#9
1900s24,176#13 (1900)#24
1910s41,819#34 (1910)#40
1920s46,538#46 (1920)#57
1930s30,022#73 (1930)#83
1940s22,788#94 (1940)#121
1950s14,613#154 (1950)#212
1960s6,993#297 (1960)#359
1970s4,665#408 (1974)#433
1980s10,381#149 (1989)#293
1990s58,252#17 (1999)#71
2000s181,414#1 (2008)#5
2010s195,070#1 (2014)#2
2020s85,652#2 (2020)#2

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Emma in 1967

girls
#385
564 births · 1 in 2,927 girls

Top girls' names in 1967

  1. #1Lisa52,437
  2. #2Kimberly33,097
  3. #3Michelle30,827
  4. #4Mary25,316
  5. #5Susan22,262
  6. #6Karen21,537
  7. #7Angela19,555
  8. #8Tammy18,652
  9. #9Melissa18,377
  10. #10Jennifer18,236
  11. #385Emma564
More about 1967

girls

1,651,025 girls got a published name in 1967; 1 in 2,927 of them was named Emma, which outranked 95.1% of the 7,852 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #381Irma576
  2. #383Bridgette575
  3. #384Mildred570
  4. #385Emma564
  5. #386Deanne561
  6. #387Darcy560
  7. #387Ladonna560
Biggest movers since 1966
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,873Anissa#2,519 → #646
  2. ↑ 1,660Buffy#2,453 → #793
  3. ↑ 1,522Nichelle#2,022 → #500
  4. ↑ 893Josette#1,621 → #728
  5. ↑ 862Lissette#1,600 → #738
Fallers
  1. ↓ 792Tatia#668 → #1,460
  2. ↓ 531Inger#929 → #1,460
  3. ↓ 400Sonji#639 → #1,039
  4. ↓ 389Sunday#983 → #1,372
  5. ↓ 325Cinda#944 → #1,269

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1967 →