Emmaleigh
- #5,410 for girls in 2025, 23 births
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 143 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,546since 1986
Emmaleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Emmaleigh has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,410 | 23 |
| 2024 | #4,669 | 29 |
| 2023 | #4,047 | 36 |
| 2022 | #4,907 | 27 |
| 2021 | #3,883 | 38 |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 |
| 2019 | #2,681 | 64 |
| 2018 | #1,978 | 99 |
| 2017 | #1,716 | 124 |
| 2016 | #2,149 | 90 |
| 2015 | #2,039 | 96 |
| 2014 | #1,922 | 104 |
| 2013 | #1,814 | 112 |
| 2012 | #1,782 | 115 |
| 2011 | #1,612 | 134 |
| 2010 | #1,556 | 143 |
| 2009 | #1,830 | 117 |
| 2008 | #1,789 | 122 |
| 2007 | #1,744 | 124 |
| 2006 | #1,905 | 106 |
| 2005 | #1,681 | 118 |
| 2004 | #1,734 | 111 |
| 2003 | #1,874 | 98 |
| 2002 | #2,379 | 67 |
| 2001 | #2,487 | 62 |
| 2000 | #2,593 | 57 |
| 1999 | #2,935 | 45 |
| 1998 | #3,301 | 37 |
| 1997 | #3,365 | 34 |
| 1996 | #3,302 | 35 |
| 1995 | #4,217 | 24 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 |
| 1993 | #5,673 | 16 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 |
| 1988 | — | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 |
| 1985 | — | |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | — | |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | — | |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Emmaleigh! It came in at #9,545, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1988, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Emmaleigh is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #819 | 5 | 1 in 3,664 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emmaleigh
- 2,728 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #5,410)
- Debuted 1986
- Peaked 2010 at #1,556 (143 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 12,431 girls born in 2010 were named Emmaleigh (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 69,881 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.5% of all girls named Emmaleigh (1,081) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 20 | #8,761 (1989) | #9,377 |
| 1990s | 248 | #2,935 (1999) | #5,096 |
| 2000s | 982 | #1,681 (2005) | #2,002 |
| 2010s | 1,081 | #1,556 (2010) | #1,925 |
| 2020s | 215 | #2,682 (2020) | #4,266 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Emmaleigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: