Emmaline
#1,235 for girls in 2025, 182 births
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 14 births
- Debut · girls
- 14 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,422since 1880
Emmaline over time
Rank among girls' names. Emmaline has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,235 | 182 |
| 2024 | #1,196 | 198 |
| 2023 | #1,226 | 192 |
| 2022 | #1,073 | 234 |
| 2021 | #1,081 | 231 |
| 2020 | #972 | 262 |
| 2019 | #916 | 289 |
| 2018 | #897 | 300 |
| 2017 | #897 | 299 |
| 2016 | #897 | 312 |
| 2015 | #904 | 305 |
| 2014 | #873 | 313 |
| 2013 | #959 | 263 |
| 2012 | #891 | 297 |
| 2011 | #1,086 | 226 |
| 2010 | #1,190 | 204 |
| 2009 | #1,408 | 167 |
| 2008 | #1,421 | 167 |
| 2007 | #1,726 | 126 |
| 2006 | #1,905 | 106 |
| 2005 | #1,719 | 115 |
| 2004 | #1,488 | 135 |
| 2003 | #1,411 | 141 |
| 2002 | #1,456 | 131 |
| 2001 | #1,585 | 117 |
| 2000 | #1,744 | 100 |
| 1999 | #1,857 | 85 |
| 1998 | #1,734 | 91 |
| 1997 | #1,845 | 80 |
| 1996 | #2,058 | 67 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 |
| 1994 | #2,432 | 52 |
| 1993 | #2,600 | 47 |
| 1992 | #2,830 | 42 |
| 1991 | #3,301 | 33 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 |
| 1988 | #4,496 | 19 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 |
| 1986 | #4,539 | 17 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 |
| 1947 | #2,448 | 17 |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 |
| 1943 | #2,079 | 18 |
| 1942 | #2,117 | 17 |
| 1941 | #2,096 | 16 |
| 1940 | #2,109 | 15 |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 |
| 1938 | #1,752 | 20 |
| 1937 | #1,999 | 16 |
| 1936 | #1,593 | 22 |
| 1935 | #1,449 | 26 |
| 1934 | #1,913 | 17 |
| 1933 | #2,052 | 15 |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 |
| 1931 | #1,686 | 21 |
| 1930 | #1,569 | 25 |
| 1929 | #1,892 | 19 |
| 1928 | #2,023 | 18 |
| 1927 | #1,728 | 24 |
| 1926 | #1,279 | 37 |
| 1925 | #1,376 | 34 |
| 1924 | #1,612 | 28 |
| 1923 | #1,350 | 34 |
| 1922 | #1,309 | 36 |
| 1921 | #1,126 | 46 |
| 1920 | #1,282 | 36 |
| 1919 | #1,133 | 42 |
| 1918 | #1,411 | 30 |
| 1917 | #1,337 | 30 |
| 1916 | #1,227 | 34 |
| 1915 | #990 | 45 |
| 1914 | #1,262 | 24 |
| 1913 | #1,405 | 17 |
| 1912 | #1,032 | 25 |
| 1911 | #898 | 23 |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 |
| 1909 | #1,152 | 13 |
| 1908 | #1,261 | 11 |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 |
| 1905 | #1,162 | 11 |
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 |
| 1902 | #1,024 | 12 |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 |
| 1900 | #1,231 | 10 |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 |
| 1898 | #920 | 14 |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 |
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 |
| 1893 | #826 | 13 |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 |
| 1888 | #724 | 13 |
| 1887 | #937 | 7 |
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 |
| 1885 | #793 | 8 |
| 1884 | #793 | 8 |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | #740 | 6 |
| 1880 | #449 | 14 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Emmaline was already there! It came in at #449, and was given to 14 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Emmaline is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wisconsin#514 · 1 in 3,187
- Utah#548 · 1 in 2,841
- Virginia#824 · 1 in 5,921
- North Carolina#1,144 · 1 in 9,018
- Georgia#1,274 · 1 in 9,612
Best ever in a state: #152 in Hawaii, 1935.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | #514 | 8 | 1 in 3,187 |
| Utah | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,841 |
| Virginia | #824 | 6 | 1 in 5,921 |
| North Carolina | #1,144 | 5 | 1 in 9,018 |
| Georgia | #1,274 | 5 | 1 in 9,612 |
| Illinois | #1,555 | 5 | 1 in 14,248 |
| Texas | #1,767 | 9 | 1 in 17,020 |
| California | #1,874 | 11 | 1 in 20,348 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emmaline
- 39 spots since 2024 (#1,196 → #1,235)
- 263 spots since 2020 (#972 → #1,235)
- 331 spots since 2015 (#904 → #1,235)
- Biggest jump: 523 spots in 1911 (#1,421 → #898)
- Biggest drop: 423 spots in 1889 (#724 → #1,147)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #449 (14 births)
- Births halved by 1881, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 2012–2020
- Highest: 1 in 5,670 girls born in 2018 were named Emmaline (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,831 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #449 in 1880, was only 1 in 6,500 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.8% of all girls named Emmaline (2,808) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 67 | #449 (1880) | #836 |
| 1890s | 80 | #826 (1893) | #1,130 |
| 1900s | 106 | #990 (1907) | #1,209 |
| 1910s | 281 | #898 (1911) | #1,212 |
| 1920s | 312 | #1,126 (1921) | #1,498 |
| 1930s | 192 | #1,449 (1935) | #1,826 |
| 1940s | 140 | #2,079 (1943) | #2,603 |
| 1950s | 85 | #3,106 (1951) | #4,267 |
| 1960s | 34 | #4,437 (1960) | #5,760 |
| 1970s | 31 | #6,611 (1976) | #8,080 |
| 1980s | 116 | #3,893 (1989) | #6,673 |
| 1990s | 566 | #1,734 (1998) | #2,540 |
| 2000s | 1,305 | #1,408 (2009) | #1,586 |
| 2010s | 2,808 | #873 (2014) | #951 |
| 2020s | 1,299 | #972 (2020) | #1,131 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emmaline in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 18,160 of them was named Emmaline, which outranked 90.1% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,730Rosie101
- #1,730Susie101
- #1,730Tricia101
- #1,744Emmaline100
- #1,744Dasha100
- #1,744Izabel100
- #1,744Jaylah100
- #1,759Abbigale99
- #1,759Adelina99
- #1,759August99
Tied with 14 names at #1,744; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.