Emmalynn
- #1,525 for girls in 2025, 139 births
- Peak · girls
- 2015 · 409 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,780since 1985
Emmalynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Emmalynn has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,525 | 139 |
| 2024 | #1,505 | 144 |
| 2023 | #1,430 | 156 |
| 2022 | #1,259 | 190 |
| 2021 | #1,116 | 221 |
| 2020 | #984 | 259 |
| 2019 | #906 | 293 |
| 2018 | #835 | 324 |
| 2017 | #889 | 304 |
| 2016 | #848 | 334 |
| 2015 | #693 | 409 |
| 2014 | #765 | 365 |
| 2013 | #841 | 313 |
| 2012 | #910 | 287 |
| 2011 | #1,079 | 228 |
| 2010 | #1,133 | 216 |
| 2009 | #1,660 | 134 |
| 2008 | #2,267 | 86 |
| 2007 | #3,247 | 52 |
| 2006 | #2,815 | 62 |
| 2005 | #2,969 | 54 |
| 2004 | #3,490 | 42 |
| 2003 | #3,472 | 41 |
| 2002 | #5,254 | 22 |
| 2001 | #6,956 | 15 |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 |
| 1994 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 |
| 1991 | — | |
| 1990 | — | |
| 1989 | — | |
| 1988 | — | |
| 1987 | — | |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | — | |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | — | |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Emmalynn! It came in at #10,677, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1991, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Emmalynn is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Missouri#640 · 1 in 3,037
- Indiana#916 · 1 in 4,651
- Washington#1,046 · 1 in 5,772
- Tennessee#1,127 · 1 in 6,415
- Ohio#1,134 · 1 in 6,753
Best ever in a state: #223 in West Virginia, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | #640 | 8 | 1 in 3,037 |
| Indiana | #916 | 6 | 1 in 4,651 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| Tennessee | #1,127 | 5 | 1 in 6,415 |
| Ohio | #1,134 | 7 | 1 in 6,753 |
| Georgia | #1,358 | 6 | 1 in 7,535 |
| Texas | #1,790 | 12 | 1 in 13,379 |
| Florida | #2,151 | 5 | 1 in 17,352 |
| California | #2,487 | 7 | 1 in 23,103 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emmalynn
- 541 spots since 2020 (#984 → #1,525)
- Biggest jump: 169 spots in 2012
- Biggest drop: 155 spots in 2016
- Debuted 1985
- Peaked 2015 at #693 (409 births)
- Births halved by 2022, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2012–2020
- Highest: 1 in 4,365 girls born in 2015 were named Emmalynn (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,563 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 64.3% of all girls named Emmalynn (3,073) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | #10,677 (1985) | #10,677 |
| 1990s | 68 | #6,360 (1998) | #9,287 |
| 2000s | 525 | #1,660 (2009) | #3,834 |
| 2010s | 3,073 | #693 (2015) | #890 |
| 2020s | 1,109 | #984 (2020) | #1,303 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Emmalynn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: