Erick
- Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902
- #366 for boys in 2025, 879 births
- Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2007 · 2,432 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 79,463since 1883
Erick over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Erick has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #366 | 879 | |
| 2024 | — | #332 | 1,040 | |
| 2023 | — | #302 | 1,107 | |
| 2022 | — | #321 | 1,050 | |
| 2021 | — | #318 | 1,041 | |
| 2020 | — | #298 | 1,126 | |
| 2019 | — | #277 | 1,284 | |
| 2018 | — | #282 | 1,247 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #256 | 1,433 |
| 2016 | — | #239 | 1,602 | |
| 2015 | — | #265 | 1,372 | |
| 2014 | — | #258 | 1,444 | |
| 2013 | — | #260 | 1,360 | |
| 2012 | — | #236 | 1,520 | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #232 | 1,546 |
| 2010 | — | #200 | 1,862 | |
| 2009 | — | #191 | 2,004 | |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #179 | 2,220 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #166 | 2,432 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #174 | 2,346 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #181 | 2,245 |
| 2004 | — | #180 | 2,232 | |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 | #186 | 2,094 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #182 | 2,052 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | #192 | 1,921 |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | #189 | 1,884 |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 | #193 | 1,742 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #206 | 1,577 |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | #197 | 1,617 |
| 1996 | #5,531 | 17 | #188 | 1,705 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #191 | 1,609 |
| 1994 | #6,319 | 14 | #185 | 1,679 |
| 1993 | #5,673 | 16 | #203 | 1,502 |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | #222 | 1,373 |
| 1991 | #4,808 | 20 | #206 | 1,508 |
| 1990 | #4,380 | 22 | #223 | 1,370 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #245 | 1,071 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #253 | 929 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #250 | 917 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #262 | 840 |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | #263 | 825 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #249 | 880 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #247 | 863 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #252 | 874 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #250 | 874 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #240 | 928 |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | #244 | 902 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #259 | 784 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #300 | 644 |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | #272 | 714 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #301 | 629 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #274 | 685 |
| 1973 | — | #274 | 669 | |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | #263 | 748 |
| 1971 | #3,508 | 18 | #276 | 766 |
| 1970 | — | #313 | 626 | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #340 | 530 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #358 | 469 |
| 1967 | — | #347 | 460 | |
| 1966 | — | #380 | 396 | |
| 1965 | — | #356 | 456 | |
| 1964 | — | #465 | 290 | |
| 1963 | — | #565 | 196 | |
| 1962 | — | #564 | 195 | |
| 1961 | — | #663 | 139 | |
| 1960 | — | #612 | 164 | |
| 1959 | — | #627 | 152 | |
| 1958 | — | #636 | 146 | |
| 1957 | — | #694 | 120 | |
| 1956 | — | #756 | 94 | |
| 1955 | — | #942 | 63 | |
| 1954 | — | #918 | 65 | |
| 1953 | — | #920 | 61 | |
| 1952 | — | #755 | 87 | |
| 1951 | — | #806 | 76 | |
| 1950 | — | #791 | 74 | |
| 1949 | — | #717 | 92 | |
| 1948 | — | #802 | 71 | |
| 1947 | — | #815 | 72 | |
| 1946 | — | #856 | 59 | |
| 1945 | — | #864 | 52 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,235 | 29 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,308 | 28 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,381 | 25 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,446 | 22 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,433 | 22 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,879 | 14 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,185 | 11 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,403 | 23 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,872 | 14 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,708 | 17 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,022 | 13 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,093 | 12 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,716 | 18 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,471 | 10 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,964 | 15 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,793 | 18 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,960 | 16 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,034 | 16 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,911 | 17 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,193 | 14 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,380 | 29 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,502 | 25 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,434 | 27 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,265 | 14 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,885 | 18 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,695 | 20 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,905 | 17 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,986 | 15 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,549 | 21 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,306 | 26 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,300 | 21 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,580 | 12 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,885 | 8 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | #951 | 10 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #857 | 7 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | #942 | 6 | |
| 1896 | — | #722 | 10 | |
| 1895 | — | #1,079 | 5 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #956 | 6 | |
| 1891 | — | #963 | 5 | |
| 1890 | — | #629 | 10 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | #765 | 7 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1883
The first year at least five boys were named Erick! It came in at #892, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Erick is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Jersey#219 · 1 in 925
- Texas#246 · 1 in 1,108
- California#252 · 1 in 1,178
- New Mexico#270 · 1 in 929
- Florida#300 · 1 in 1,493
Best ever in a state: #83 in District of Columbia, 2008.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #219 | 43 | 1 in 925 |
| Texas | #246 | 158 | 1 in 1,108 |
| California | #252 | 149 | 1 in 1,178 |
| New Mexico | #270 | 7 | 1 in 929 |
| Florida | #300 | 64 | 1 in 1,493 |
| Colorado | #305 | 21 | 1 in 1,279 |
| Illinois | #306 | 35 | 1 in 1,416 |
| Arizona | #308 | 25 | 1 in 1,309 |
| New York | #311 | 59 | 1 in 1,431 |
| Nevada | #323 | 9 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Virginia | #329 | 25 | 1 in 1,490 |
| Tennessee | #359 | 23 | 1 in 1,599 |
| Massachusetts | #361 | 14 | 1 in 1,930 |
| Maryland | #389 | 13 | 1 in 1,761 |
| Georgia | #393 | 29 | 1 in 1,732 |
| Oregon | #398 | 9 | 1 in 1,673 |
| South Carolina | #414 | 12 | 1 in 1,767 |
| Minnesota | #420 | 13 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Nebraska | #432 | 5 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Wisconsin | #437 | 11 | 1 in 2,130 |
| Arkansas | #444 | 7 | 1 in 1,798 |
| North Carolina | #447 | 24 | 1 in 2,145 |
| Kentucky | #450 | 10 | 1 in 2,054 |
| Oklahoma | #464 | 9 | 1 in 1,965 |
| Kansas | #468 | 7 | 1 in 2,007 |
| Indiana | #545 | 12 | 1 in 2,639 |
| Utah | #561 | 7 | 1 in 2,809 |
| Missouri | #597 | 9 | 1 in 3,090 |
| Michigan | #601 | 13 | 1 in 3,092 |
| Alabama | #622 | 7 | 1 in 3,074 |
| Washington | #639 | 10 | 1 in 3,280 |
| Louisiana | #775 | 5 | 1 in 3,826 |
| Pennsylvania | #792 | 10 | 1 in 5,226 |
| Ohio | #1,111 | 6 | 1 in 8,756 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Erick
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 68 spots since 2020 (#298 → #366)
- Biggest jump: 371 spots in 1945
- Biggest drop: 334 spots in 1891
Rise & fade · boys
124 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1883
- Peaked 2007 at #166 (2,432 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 92 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1945–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 853
- Highest: 1 in 853 boys born in 2007 were named Erick (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,943 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 27.0% of all boys named Erick (21,430) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 25 | #722 (1889) | #835 |
| 1890s | 49 | #629 (1890) | #878 |
| 1900s | 10 | #951 (1909) | #951 |
| 1910s | 140 | #1,300 (1914) | #1,651 |
| 1920s | 194 | #1,380 (1924) | #1,836 |
| 1930s | 147 | #1,403 (1937) | #1,931 |
| 1940s | 472 | #717 (1949) | #1,086 |
| 1950s | 938 | #627 (1959) | #785 |
| 1960s | 3,295 | #340 (1969) | #465 |
| 1970s | 7,167 | #244 (1979) | #278 |
| 1980s | 9,001 | #240 (1980) | #251 |
| 1990s | 15,682 | #185 (1994) | #201 |
| 2000s | 21,430 | #166 (2007) | #182 |
| 2010s | 14,670 | #200 (2010) | #251 |
| 2020s | 6,243 | #298 (2020) | #323 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Erick ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: