Estefany
#1,927 for girls in 2025, 100 births · Last seen for boys in 1993 at #8,700
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1996 · 202 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,660since 1983
Estefany over time
Rank among girls' names. Estefany has never cracked the top 900 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,927 | 100 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,546 | 138 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,636 | 127 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,763 | 117 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,910 | 103 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,716 | 118 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,875 | 107 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,787 | 114 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,703 | 125 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,573 | 141 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,545 | 143 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,757 | 118 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,824 | 111 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,530 | 144 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,469 | 152 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,342 | 175 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,322 | 182 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,200 | 212 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,100 | 236 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,068 | 238 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,067 | 223 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,121 | 203 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,013 | 228 | — | |
| 2002 | #958 | 232 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,025 | 210 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,120 | 182 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,215 | 156 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,065 | 183 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,120 | 167 | — | |
| 1996 | #950 | 202 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,120 | 158 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,304 | 130 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,460 | 109 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #1,434 | 112 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,656 | 90 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,923 | 72 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,338 | 50 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,393 | 28 | — | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Estefany! It came in at #10,275, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1983–1984, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Estefany is popular in 1996
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#455 · 1 in 2,703
- Arizona#623 · 1 in 3,559
- Illinois#632 · 1 in 4,466
- New Jersey#691 · 1 in 5,292
- Texas#728 · 1 in 5,168
Best ever in a state: #148 in District of Columbia, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #455 | 85 | 1 in 2,703 |
| Arizona | #623 | 8 | 1 in 3,559 |
| Illinois | #632 | 16 | 1 in 4,466 |
| New Jersey | #691 | 8 | 1 in 5,292 |
| Texas | #728 | 27 | 1 in 5,168 |
| New York | #898 | 15 | 1 in 6,955 |
| Florida | #912 | 10 | 1 in 7,273 |
| Georgia | #1,018 | 5 | 1 in 8,302 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Estefany
- 381 spots since 2024 (#1,546 → #1,927)
- 211 spots since 2020 (#1,716 → #1,927)
- 382 spots since 2015 (#1,545 → #1,927)
- Biggest jump: 170 spots in 1996 (#1,120 → #950)
- Biggest drop: 170 spots in 1997 (#950 → #1,120)
- Debuted 1983
- Peaked 1996 at #950 (202 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 29 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · 1996–2002
- Highest: 1 in 7,745 girls born in 2002 were named Estefany (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 16,073 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #950 in 1996, was only 1 in 8,678 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.9% of all girls named Estefany (2,146) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 102 | #2,338 (1989) | #7,533 |
| 1990s | 1,379 | #950 (1996) | #1,325 |
| 2000s | 2,146 | #958 (2002) | #1,099 |
| 2010s | 1,330 | #1,342 (2010) | #1,641 |
| 2020s | 703 | #1,546 (2024) | #1,750 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Estefany in 1996
Top girls' names in 1996
More about 1996
girls
1,753,007 girls got a published name in 1996; 1 in 8,678 of them was named Estefany, which outranked 94.0% of the 15,894 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #946Kyleigh203
- #946Tatum203
- #946Valentina203
- #950Estefany202
- #950Alyssia202
- #950Anjelica202
- #950Billie202
- #957Alesha201
- #957Ansley201
- #957Madyson201
Tied with 6 names at #950; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.