Estell
Last seen for girls in 1983 at #10,275 · Last seen for boys in 1971 at #4,907
Given to girls 88.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1910 · 105 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,232since 1880
Estell over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | — | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #4,896 | 8 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,450 | 20 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,236 | 22 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #2,074 | 24 | #2,875 | 8 |
| 1951 | #2,314 | 19 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,871 | 26 | #2,019 | 14 |
| 1949 | #1,882 | 26 | #2,453 | 10 |
| 1948 | #2,070 | 22 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,448 | 17 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,418 | 32 | #2,393 | 9 |
| 1944 | #1,609 | 26 | #2,195 | 11 |
| 1943 | #1,527 | 30 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,497 | 30 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,310 | 34 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #1,374 | 30 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #1,424 | 27 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #1,045 | 47 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #1,160 | 38 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,182 | 36 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #981 | 49 | #1,783 | 16 |
| 1933 | #973 | 50 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #816 | 70 | #2,101 | 13 |
| 1931 | #844 | 66 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #768 | 84 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #779 | 80 | #1,933 | 16 |
| 1928 | #773 | 86 | #1,822 | 18 |
| 1927 | #717 | 101 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1926 | #690 | 111 | #2,725 | 10 |
| 1925 | #721 | 104 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1924 | #705 | 111 | #3,505 | 7 |
| 1923 | #666 | 125 | #1,502 | 25 |
| 1922 | #632 | 135 | #1,434 | 27 |
| 1921 | #672 | 121 | #1,549 | 24 |
| 1920 | #576 | 155 | #1,543 | 24 |
| 1919 | #597 | 139 | #1,973 | 16 |
| 1918 | #587 | 148 | #2,543 | 11 |
| 1917 | #592 | 133 | #1,693 | 19 |
| 1916 | #619 | 119 | #1,265 | 28 |
| 1915 | #576 | 126 | #1,878 | 15 |
| 1914 | #518 | 117 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #525 | 94 | #1,497 | 13 |
| 1912 | #464 | 105 | #1,619 | 10 |
| 1911 | #501 | 68 | — | |
| 1910 | #385 | 105 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #468 | 64 | — | |
| 1908 | #448 | 65 | #1,021 | 8 |
| 1907 | #497 | 52 | — | |
| 1906 | #437 | 62 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #510 | 44 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #445 | 53 | — | |
| 1903 | #527 | 37 | — | |
| 1902 | #509 | 39 | — | |
| 1901 | #499 | 37 | — | |
| 1900 | #415 | 66 | #836 | 10 |
| 1899 | #449 | 42 | #1,051 | 5 |
| 1898 | #697 | 22 | — | |
| 1897 | #660 | 22 | — | |
| 1896 | #538 | 31 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | — | |
| 1894 | #494 | 33 | — | |
| 1893 | #487 | 31 | — | |
| 1892 | #685 | 18 | — | |
| 1891 | #589 | 20 | — | |
| 1890 | #499 | 27 | #994 | 5 |
| 1889 | #589 | 19 | — | |
| 1888 | #959 | 8 | — | |
| 1887 | #586 | 15 | — | |
| 1886 | #731 | 10 | — | |
| 1885 | #576 | 14 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | #678 | 8 | — | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | #580 | 9 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Estell was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Estell is popular in 1911
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#140 · 1 in 650
- Alabama#161 · 1 in 798
- Georgia#280 · 1 in 2,145
- Texas#509 · 1 in 3,905
Best ever in a state: #140 in South Carolina, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #140 | 14 | 1 in 650 |
| Alabama | #161 | 15 | 1 in 798 |
| Georgia | #280 | 7 | 1 in 2,145 |
| Texas | #509 | 5 | 1 in 3,905 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Estell
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1983
- Biggest jump: 370 spots in 1889 (#959 → #589)
- Biggest drop: 373 spots in 1888 (#586 → #959)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1910 at #385 (105 births)
- Births halved by 1933, 23 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1884–1934
- Highest: 1 in 3,776 girls born in 1910 were named Estell (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 334,122 girls born in 1983 (0.00%)
- 27.3% of all girls named Estell (1,154) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 96 | #576 (1885) | #660 |
| 1890s | 269 | #449 (1899) | #574 |
| 1900s | 519 | #415 (1900) | #476 |
| 1910s | 1,154 | #385 (1910) | #536 |
| 1920s | 1,129 | #576 (1920) | #693 |
| 1930s | 507 | #768 (1930) | #1,031 |
| 1940s | 274 | #1,310 (1941) | #1,686 |
| 1950s | 164 | #1,871 (1950) | #3,050 |
| 1960s | 68 | #4,011 (1962) | #4,964 |
| 1970s | 39 | #5,751 (1979) | #7,598 |
| 1980s | 13 | #7,418 (1980) | #8,847 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Estell in 1911
Top girls' names in 1911
More about 1911
girls
418,309 girls got a published name in 1911; 1 in 6,152 of them was named Estell, which outranked 82.5% of the 2,868 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).