Estill
Last seen for girls in 1920 at #3,957 · Last seen for boys in 1993 at #8,700
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1883 · 5 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,246since 1883
Estill over time
Rank among boys' names. Estill has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | #8,700 | 5 | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | #6,250 | 5 | |
| 1979 | — | #6,056 | 5 | |
| 1978 | — | #4,157 | 8 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,164 | 8 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #3,659 | 9 | |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,986 | 5 | |
| 1971 | — | #4,375 | 6 | |
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,314 | 8 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,735 | 10 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,611 | 10 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,784 | 9 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,780 | 9 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,854 | 9 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,044 | 8 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,504 | 11 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,706 | 10 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,210 | 14 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #2,506 | 11 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,375 | 12 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,497 | 11 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,435 | 11 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,743 | 9 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,514 | 10 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,904 | 16 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,019 | 14 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,820 | 17 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,519 | 24 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,509 | 22 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,581 | 18 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,574 | 19 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,461 | 23 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,799 | 16 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,759 | 16 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,081 | 12 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,578 | 18 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,337 | 25 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,627 | 18 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,463 | 21 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,929 | 14 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,725 | 17 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,405 | 23 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,356 | 26 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,101 | 13 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,559 | 22 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,611 | 21 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,323 | 30 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,516 | 25 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,432 | 26 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,225 | 34 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,492 | 26 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,696 | 21 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,503 | 25 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,140 | 39 | |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | #1,252 | 33 |
| 1919 | — | #1,034 | 43 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,152 | 36 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,113 | 36 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,072 | 36 | |
| 1915 | — | #980 | 41 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,545 | 16 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,173 | 19 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,095 | 18 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,290 | 8 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,589 | 5 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,277 | 6 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,113 | 7 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #1,004 | 7 | |
| 1905 | — | #1,233 | 5 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #1,101 | 5 | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Estill! It came in at #892, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1893, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Estill is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#103 · 1 in 552
Best ever in a state: #103 in Kentucky, 1915.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #103 | 34 | 1 in 552 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Estill
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1993
- Biggest jump: 565 spots in 1915 (#1,545 → #980)
- Biggest drop: 92 spots in 1916 (#980 → #1,072)
- Debuted 1883
- Peaked 1883 at #892 (5 births)
- Births halved by 1884, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 3 yrs · 1883–1915
- Highest: 1 in 19,022 boys born in 1906 were named Estill (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 392,266 boys born in 1993 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #892 in 1883, was only 1 in 20,925 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.5% of all boys named Estill (280) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #892 (1883) | #892 |
| 1890s | 11 | #954 (1894) | #1,028 |
| 1900s | 41 | #1,004 (1906) | #1,150 |
| 1910s | 258 | #980 (1915) | #1,204 |
| 1920s | 280 | #1,140 (1921) | #1,419 |
| 1930s | 197 | #1,337 (1938) | #1,608 |
| 1940s | 176 | #1,461 (1943) | #1,771 |
| 1950s | 104 | #1,904 (1951) | #2,392 |
| 1960s | 98 | #2,210 (1960) | #2,754 |
| 1970s | 59 | #3,659 (1975) | #4,545 |
| 1980s | 12 | #4,961 (1981) | #5,606 |
| 1990s | 5 | #8,700 (1993) | #8,700 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Estill in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 20,697 of them was named Estill, which outranked 77.7% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).