Eunice
#2,354 for girls in 2025, 77 births · Last seen for boys in 1991 at #5,096
Given to girls 98.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1908 · 676 births
- Debut · girls
- 67 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 80,336since 1880
Eunice over time
Rank among girls' names. Eunice has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,354 | 77 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,966 | 100 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,195 | 86 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,828 | 111 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,071 | 92 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,860 | 104 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,585 | 134 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,672 | 125 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,625 | 133 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,505 | 151 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,537 | 145 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,508 | 147 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,502 | 147 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,602 | 135 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,540 | 142 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,372 | 169 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,650 | 135 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,486 | 157 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,424 | 166 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,314 | 178 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,508 | 138 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,082 | 212 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,209 | 176 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,142 | 182 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,147 | 182 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,075 | 192 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,012 | 202 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,028 | 193 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,061 | 179 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,036 | 180 | — | |
| 1995 | #893 | 212 | — | |
| 1994 | #931 | 202 | — | |
| 1993 | #934 | 202 | — | |
| 1992 | #898 | 218 | — | |
| 1991 | #965 | 195 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #924 | 206 | — | |
| 1989 | #972 | 179 | — | |
| 1988 | #841 | 214 | — | |
| 1987 | #913 | 182 | — | |
| 1986 | #915 | 176 | — | |
| 1985 | #969 | 159 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,028 | 138 | — | |
| 1983 | #983 | 148 | — | |
| 1982 | #914 | 165 | — | |
| 1981 | #998 | 146 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #871 | 176 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #995 | 143 | — | |
| 1978 | #924 | 153 | #5,059 | 6 |
| 1977 | #936 | 148 | — | |
| 1976 | #818 | 170 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #807 | 170 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #831 | 159 | — | |
| 1973 | #761 | 177 | — | |
| 1972 | #784 | 174 | — | |
| 1971 | #788 | 184 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #762 | 191 | — | |
| 1969 | #717 | 198 | — | |
| 1968 | #688 | 198 | — | |
| 1967 | #685 | 200 | — | |
| 1966 | #630 | 231 | — | |
| 1965 | #624 | 245 | — | |
| 1964 | #565 | 303 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #564 | 303 | — | |
| 1962 | #560 | 306 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #541 | 332 | — | |
| 1960 | #533 | 326 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #498 | 384 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #486 | 384 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #452 | 437 | #2,631 | 10 |
| 1956 | #453 | 406 | #2,168 | 14 |
| 1955 | #424 | 432 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #427 | 422 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #397 | 456 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #367 | 505 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #349 | 525 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #332 | 543 | #2,438 | 10 |
| 1949 | #329 | 555 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #314 | 601 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #297 | 705 | #2,251 | 12 |
| 1946 | #291 | 632 | #1,884 | 15 |
| 1945 | #275 | 628 | #1,697 | 16 |
| 1944 | #255 | 715 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #241 | 785 | #1,636 | 19 |
| 1942 | #240 | 799 | #1,799 | 16 |
| 1941 | #226 | 772 | #1,588 | 19 |
| 1940 | #202 | 868 | #1,471 | 21 |
| 1939 | #205 | 848 | #1,879 | 14 |
| 1938 | #195 | 942 | #1,559 | 19 |
| 1937 | #186 | 1,042 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #179 | 1,062 | #1,417 | 22 |
| 1935 | #170 | 1,129 | #1,584 | 19 |
| 1934 | #161 | 1,231 | #1,461 | 22 |
| 1933 | #154 | 1,189 | #1,281 | 27 |
| 1932 | #146 | 1,376 | #1,254 | 29 |
| 1931 | #147 | 1,344 | #1,538 | 21 |
| 1930 | #148 | 1,438 | #1,283 | 31 |
| 1929 | #145 | 1,546 | #1,443 | 25 |
| 1928 | #138 | 1,721 | #1,293 | 31 |
| 1927 | #134 | 1,948 | #1,468 | 26 |
| 1926 | #134 | 1,942 | #1,331 | 30 |
| 1925 | #130 | 2,097 | #1,144 | 38 |
| 1924 | #130 | 2,147 | #1,204 | 36 |
| 1923 | #125 | 2,114 | #1,420 | 27 |
| 1922 | #119 | 2,179 | #1,367 | 29 |
| 1921 | #120 | 2,240 | #1,329 | 31 |
| 1920 | #115 | 2,238 | #1,119 | 40 |
| 1919 | #119 | 2,061 | #1,097 | 39 |
| 1918 | #111 | 2,224 | #1,373 | 27 |
| 1917 | #111 | 2,035 | #1,322 | 27 |
| 1916 | #110 | 1,964 | #922 | 47 |
| 1915 | #109 | 1,860 | #1,217 | 29 |
| 1914 | #109 | 1,478 | #1,300 | 21 |
| 1913 | #107 | 1,214 | #1,311 | 16 |
| 1912 | #109 | 1,066 | #1,174 | 16 |
| 1911 | #109 | 830 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | #113 | 742 | #1,314 | 7 |
| 1909 | #117 | 625 | #951 | 10 |
| 1908 | #106 | 676 | #825 | 11 |
| 1907 | #111 | 608 | #999 | 8 |
| 1906 | #114 | 554 | #798 | 10 |
| 1905 | #122 | 525 | #1,091 | 6 |
| 1904 | #117 | 502 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #119 | 469 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #118 | 490 | #933 | 7 |
| 1901 | #122 | 424 | — | |
| 1900 | #125 | 503 | #699 | 13 |
| 1899 | #126 | 385 | #928 | 6 |
| 1898 | #123 | 437 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #127 | 387 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #136 | 351 | — | |
| 1895 | #137 | 334 | #978 | 6 |
| 1894 | #148 | 295 | — | |
| 1893 | #135 | 310 | #1,035 | 5 |
| 1892 | #141 | 294 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #148 | 237 | — | |
| 1890 | #166 | 214 | — | |
| 1889 | #163 | 185 | — | |
| 1888 | #162 | 180 | — | |
| 1887 | #172 | 136 | — | |
| 1886 | #163 | 142 | — | |
| 1885 | #157 | 136 | — | |
| 1884 | #166 | 112 | — | |
| 1883 | #160 | 106 | — | |
| 1882 | #183 | 75 | — | |
| 1881 | #172 | 77 | — | |
| 1880 | #182 | 67 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Eunice was already there! It came in at #182, and was given to 67 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 78 girls a year got the name.
Where Eunice is popular in 1933
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Florida#70 · 1 in 288
- North Dakota#87 · 1 in 321
- Wisconsin#87 · 1 in 390
- South Dakota#100 · 1 in 396
- Mississippi#106 · 1 in 398
Best ever in a state: #36 in Florida, 1919.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #70 | 39 | 1 in 288 |
| North Dakota | #87 | 17 | 1 in 321 |
| Wisconsin | #87 | 55 | 1 in 390 |
| South Dakota | #100 | 13 | 1 in 396 |
| Mississippi | #106 | 51 | 1 in 398 |
| Nebraska | #108 | 19 | 1 in 515 |
| Virginia | #110 | 54 | 1 in 419 |
| Minnesota | #111 | 34 | 1 in 539 |
| South Carolina | #115 | 42 | 1 in 479 |
| Hawaii | #116 | 7 | 1 in 445 |
| New Hampshire | #116 | 5 | 1 in 564 |
| Georgia | #118 | 55 | 1 in 523 |
| Alabama | #124 | 53 | 1 in 517 |
| Michigan | #125 | 50 | 1 in 695 |
| Iowa | #126 | 27 | 1 in 638 |
| District of Columbia | #128 | 5 | 1 in 729 |
| North Carolina | #134 | 61 | 1 in 564 |
| Louisiana | #139 | 37 | 1 in 516 |
| Arkansas | #140 | 34 | 1 in 539 |
| Massachusetts | #140 | 28 | 1 in 985 |
| West Virginia | #145 | 27 | 1 in 609 |
| Illinois | #147 | 57 | 1 in 844 |
| Oklahoma | #150 | 31 | 1 in 705 |
| New Mexico | #153 | 7 | 1 in 640 |
| Missouri | #157 | 32 | 1 in 819 |
| Kentucky | #158 | 36 | 1 in 722 |
| Oregon | #160 | 6 | 1 in 777 |
| Ohio | #164 | 36 | 1 in 1,193 |
| Tennessee | #171 | 31 | 1 in 827 |
| Connecticut | #173 | 7 | 1 in 1,323 |
| Colorado | #177 | 9 | 1 in 844 |
| Maine | #182 | 6 | 1 in 986 |
| Kansas | #190 | 11 | 1 in 1,167 |
| Indiana | #210 | 13 | 1 in 1,650 |
| California | #215 | 25 | 1 in 1,316 |
| Maryland | #218 | 7 | 1 in 1,631 |
| New York | #218 | 47 | 1 in 1,759 |
| Pennsylvania | #221 | 36 | 1 in 1,906 |
| Washington | #230 | 5 | 1 in 1,687 |
| New Jersey | #231 | 11 | 1 in 2,193 |
| Texas | #238 | 47 | 1 in 1,160 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eunice
- 388 spots since 2024 (#1,966 → #2,354)
- 494 spots since 2020 (#1,860 → #2,354)
- 817 spots since 2015 (#1,537 → #2,354)
- Biggest jump: 124 spots in 1980 (#995 → #871)
- Biggest drop: 143 spots in 1996 (#893 → #1,036)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1908 at #106 (676 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 52 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 115 yrs · run 1880–1983
- Highest: 1 in 495 girls born in 1908 were named Eunice (0.20%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,874 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 25.1% of all girls named Eunice (20,172) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,216 | #157 (1885) | #168 |
| 1890s | 3,244 | #123 (1898) | #139 |
| 1900s | 5,376 | #106 (1908) | #117 |
| 1910s | 15,474 | #107 (1913) | #111 |
| 1920s | 20,172 | #115 (1920) | #129 |
| 1930s | 11,601 | #146 (1932) | #169 |
| 1940s | 7,060 | #202 (1940) | #267 |
| 1950s | 4,494 | #332 (1950) | #419 |
| 1960s | 2,642 | #533 (1960) | #611 |
| 1970s | 1,669 | #761 (1973) | #841 |
| 1980s | 1,683 | #841 (1988) | #940 |
| 1990s | 1,989 | #893 (1995) | #968 |
| 2000s | 1,718 | #1,075 (2000) | #1,304 |
| 2010s | 1,428 | #1,372 (2010) | #1,545 |
| 2020s | 570 | #1,828 (2022) | #2,046 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eunice in 1933
Top girls' names in 1933
Top boys' names in 1933
More about 1933
girls
1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 848 of them was named Eunice, which outranked 96.8% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 36,723 of them was named Eunice, which outranked 69.2% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,251Titus28
- #1,251Wendel28
- #1,251Zack28
- #1,281Eunice27
- #1,281Braxton27
- #1,281Donavon27
- #1,281Doy27
- #1,310Anastacio26
- #1,310Conway26
- #1,310Doyal26
Tied with 28 names at #1,281; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.