Everett
#2,298 for girls in 2025, 79 births · #77 for boys in 2025, 4,287 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 4,287 births
- Debut · boys
- 110 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 39 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 135,900since 1880
Everett over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,298 | 79 | #77 | 4,287 |
| 2024 | #2,607 | 67 | #85 | 3,961 |
| 2023 | #3,014 | 55 | #89 | 3,826 |
| 2022 | #2,404 | 76 | #81 | 4,141 |
| 2021 | #2,212 | 84 | #83 | 4,250 |
| 2020 | #2,376 | 74 | #90 | 4,013 |
| 2019 | #2,355 | 76 | #94 | 4,082 |
| 2018 | #2,610 | 66 | #95 | 4,029 |
| 2017 | #3,305 | 48 | #106 | 3,781 |
| 2016 | #3,229 | 50 | #114 | 3,514 |
| 2015 | #3,478 | 45 | #136 | 3,050 |
| 2014 | #4,269 | 34 | #167 | 2,538 |
| 2013 | #5,317 | 25 | #189 | 2,148 |
| 2012 | #6,110 | 21 | #214 | 1,740 |
| 2011 | #8,196 | 14 | #258 | 1,343 |
| 2010 | #10,451 | 10 | #287 | 1,179 |
| 2009 | #8,888 | 13 | #320 | 997 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #382 | 803 |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #381 | 804 |
| 2006 | — | #449 | 600 | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #534 | 455 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #536 | 440 |
| 2003 | — | #572 | 387 | |
| 2002 | — | #590 | 354 | |
| 2001 | — | #598 | 330 | |
| 2000 | — | #587 | 340 | |
| 1999 | — | #578 | 337 | |
| 1998 | — | #582 | 333 | |
| 1997 | — | #596 | 297 | |
| 1996 | — | #617 | 282 | |
| 1995 | — | #649 | 258 | |
| 1994 | — | #618 | 285 | |
| 1993 | — | #592 | 302 | |
| 1992 | — | #595 | 299 | |
| 1991 | — | #592 | 296 | |
| 1990 | — | #556 | 331 | |
| 1989 | — | #541 | 322 | |
| 1988 | — | #513 | 322 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #517 | 302 |
| 1986 | — | #527 | 282 | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #509 | 293 |
| 1984 | — | #485 | 298 | |
| 1983 | — | #490 | 295 | |
| 1982 | — | #467 | 328 | |
| 1981 | — | #448 | 341 | |
| 1980 | — | #459 | 336 | |
| 1979 | — | #455 | 318 | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #465 | 301 |
| 1977 | — | #453 | 311 | |
| 1976 | — | #432 | 320 | |
| 1975 | — | #413 | 350 | |
| 1974 | — | #422 | 345 | |
| 1973 | — | #397 | 382 | |
| 1972 | — | #380 | 425 | |
| 1971 | — | #381 | 443 | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #380 | 453 |
| 1969 | — | #365 | 467 | |
| 1968 | — | #347 | 497 | |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #321 | 542 |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | #314 | 558 |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #295 | 653 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #299 | 698 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #293 | 702 |
| 1962 | — | #303 | 651 | |
| 1961 | — | #295 | 691 | |
| 1960 | — | #312 | 630 | |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | #298 | 692 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #292 | 673 |
| 1957 | — | #280 | 728 | |
| 1956 | — | #281 | 693 | |
| 1955 | — | #262 | 713 | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #253 | 761 |
| 1953 | — | #252 | 745 | |
| 1952 | — | #248 | 749 | |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | #244 | 768 |
| 1950 | — | #244 | 749 | |
| 1949 | — | #219 | 835 | |
| 1948 | — | #213 | 881 | |
| 1947 | — | #213 | 896 | |
| 1946 | — | #191 | 935 | |
| 1945 | — | #185 | 828 | |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | #174 | 964 |
| 1943 | — | #174 | 1,002 | |
| 1942 | — | #161 | 1,056 | |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | #166 | 990 |
| 1940 | — | #168 | 927 | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #163 | 977 |
| 1938 | — | #159 | 999 | |
| 1937 | #2,940 | 9 | #156 | 975 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #154 | 977 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #146 | 1,071 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 | #145 | 1,068 |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #139 | 1,128 |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #140 | 1,205 |
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 | #136 | 1,229 |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | #134 | 1,326 |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | #130 | 1,309 |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | #123 | 1,427 |
| 1927 | #2,699 | 12 | #120 | 1,570 |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 | #119 | 1,569 |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #108 | 1,617 |
| 1924 | #2,809 | 12 | #104 | 1,696 |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | #99 | 1,745 |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | #98 | 1,798 |
| 1921 | #2,378 | 15 | #95 | 1,913 |
| 1920 | #2,731 | 12 | #95 | 1,827 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | #92 | 1,772 |
| 1918 | #2,376 | 14 | #93 | 1,891 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #94 | 1,734 |
| 1916 | — | #91 | 1,764 | |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | #89 | 1,731 |
| 1914 | #2,009 | 12 | #90 | 1,336 |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | #97 | 948 |
| 1912 | — | #96 | 806 | |
| 1911 | — | #102 | 384 | |
| 1910 | — | #88 | 382 | |
| 1909 | — | #90 | 314 | |
| 1908 | — | #90 | 294 | |
| 1907 | — | #88 | 302 | |
| 1906 | — | #81 | 291 | |
| 1905 | — | #89 | 270 | |
| 1904 | — | #95 | 229 | |
| 1903 | — | #95 | 204 | |
| 1902 | — | #88 | 238 | |
| 1901 | — | #86 | 218 | |
| 1900 | — | #100 | 237 | |
| 1899 | — | #95 | 181 | |
| 1898 | — | #95 | 212 | |
| 1897 | — | #100 | 179 | |
| 1896 | — | #90 | 224 | |
| 1895 | — | #94 | 207 | |
| 1894 | — | #86 | 226 | |
| 1893 | — | #109 | 160 | |
| 1892 | — | #105 | 176 | |
| 1891 | — | #93 | 174 | |
| 1890 | — | #102 | 163 | |
| 1889 | — | #102 | 163 | |
| 1888 | — | #107 | 156 | |
| 1887 | — | #102 | 140 | |
| 1886 | — | #103 | 150 | |
| 1885 | — | #109 | 128 | |
| 1884 | — | #112 | 134 | |
| 1883 | — | #92 | 143 | |
| 1882 | — | #105 | 139 | |
| 1881 | — | #110 | 111 | |
| 1880 | — | #120 | 110 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Everett was already there! It came in at #120, and was given to 110 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1890, when fewer than 170 boys a year got the name.
Where Everett is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Rhode Island#48 · 1 in 240
- Wyoming#55 · 1 in 208
- Vermont#60 · 1 in 243
- Kentucky#62 · 1 in 316
- Maine#65 · 1 in 295
Best ever in a state: #11 in Vermont, 2022.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #48 | 19 | 1 in 240 |
| Wyoming | #55 | 7 | 1 in 208 |
| Vermont | #60 | 10 | 1 in 243 |
| Kentucky | #62 | 83 | 1 in 316 |
| Maine | #65 | 22 | 1 in 295 |
| New Hampshire | #69 | 8 | 1 in 382 |
| Connecticut | #80 | 17 | 1 in 587 |
| Kansas | #80 | 41 | 1 in 340 |
| Missouri | #84 | 65 | 1 in 425 |
| Massachusetts | #87 | 40 | 1 in 745 |
| Idaho | #89 | 10 | 1 in 343 |
| West Virginia | #94 | 33 | 1 in 509 |
| Oklahoma | #95 | 48 | 1 in 453 |
| District of Columbia | #98 | 7 | 1 in 546 |
| Indiana | #99 | 43 | 1 in 537 |
| Nebraska | #103 | 24 | 1 in 456 |
| Iowa | #104 | 36 | 1 in 507 |
| Minnesota | #104 | 38 | 1 in 523 |
| Washington | #110 | 16 | 1 in 566 |
| Arkansas | #111 | 32 | 1 in 554 |
| Tennessee | #114 | 38 | 1 in 673 |
| Virginia | #114 | 38 | 1 in 591 |
| Illinois | #115 | 70 | 1 in 739 |
| Oregon | #119 | 9 | 1 in 584 |
| Colorado | #124 | 13 | 1 in 616 |
| Montana | #125 | 6 | 1 in 589 |
| New Jersey | #125 | 22 | 1 in 1,204 |
| Ohio | #130 | 50 | 1 in 922 |
| Florida | #137 | 16 | 1 in 758 |
| Wisconsin | #142 | 22 | 1 in 1,053 |
| New York | #146 | 63 | 1 in 1,406 |
| Maryland | #150 | 9 | 1 in 1,303 |
| North Dakota | #152 | 8 | 1 in 741 |
| North Carolina | #171 | 32 | 1 in 1,062 |
| California | #175 | 31 | 1 in 1,138 |
| Arizona | #179 | 5 | 1 in 795 |
| Michigan | #188 | 21 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Georgia | #196 | 20 | 1 in 1,460 |
| South Carolina | #197 | 13 | 1 in 1,455 |
| Texas | #208 | 49 | 1 in 1,147 |
| New Mexico | #211 | 5 | 1 in 951 |
| Louisiana | #233 | 13 | 1 in 1,489 |
| Mississippi | #233 | 11 | 1 in 1,799 |
| Pennsylvania | #258 | 19 | 1 in 3,877 |
| Alabama | #262 | 13 | 1 in 2,135 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Everett
- 8 spots since 2024 (#85 → #77)
- 13 spots since 2020 (#90 → #77)
- 59 spots since 2015 (#136 → #77)
- Biggest jump: 85 spots in 2006 (#534 → #449)
- Biggest drop: 36 spots in 1991 (#556 → #592)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #77 (4,287 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 39 yrs · run 1894–1910
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 398 boys born in 2025 were named Everett (0.25%)
- 20.2% of all boys named Everett (27,404) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #81 (1906) → #649 (1995) → #77 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,374 | #92 (1883) | #106 |
| 1890s | 1,902 | #86 (1894) | #97 |
| 1900s | 2,597 | #81 (1906) | #90 |
| 1910s | 12,748 | #88 (1910) | #93 |
| 1920s | 16,471 | #95 (1921) | #109 |
| 1930s | 10,955 | #134 (1930) | #147 |
| 1940s | 9,314 | #161 (1942) | #186 |
| 1950s | 7,271 | #244 (1951) | #265 |
| 1960s | 6,089 | #293 (1963) | #314 |
| 1970s | 3,648 | #380 (1970) | #418 |
| 1980s | 3,119 | #448 (1981) | #496 |
| 1990s | 3,020 | #556 (1990) | #598 |
| 2000s | 5,510 | #320 (2009) | #495 |
| 2010s | 27,404 | #94 (2019) | #166 |
| 2020s | 24,478 | #77 (2025) | #84 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Everett in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 177,858 of them was named Everett, which outranked 23.5% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,568Zellie7
- #3,568Zelphia7
- #3,568Zeola7
- #3,901Everett6
- #3,901Adalene6
- #3,901Adamae6
- #3,901Addis6
- #4,411Abbey5
- #4,411Adda5
- #4,411Adelita5
Tied with 509 names at #3,901; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 867 of them was named Everett, which outranked 96.7% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.