Everleigh
- #194 for girls in 2025, 1,615 births
- Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
- Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 2,827 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 20,924since 2008
Everleigh over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #194 | 1,615 | — | |
| 2024 | #164 | 1,858 | — | |
| 2023 | #149 | 1,930 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #100 | 2,722 | — | |
| 2021 | #99 | 2,699 | — | |
| 2020 | #94 | 2,827 | — | |
| 2019 | #108 | 2,620 | — | |
| 2018 | #197 | 1,559 | — | |
| 2017 | #387 | 807 | — | |
| 2016 | #568 | 548 | — | |
| 2015 | #609 | 478 | — | |
| 2014 | #710 | 396 | — | |
| 2013 | #866 | 297 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,405 | 164 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,497 | 149 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,278 | 186 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,940 | 59 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | — | |
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
2008
The first year at least five girls were named Everleigh! It came in at #10,807, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2008, when fewer than 11 girls a year got the name.
Where Everleigh is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- West Virginia#32 · 1 in 164
- Arkansas#50 · 1 in 258
- Alabama#53 · 1 in 295
- Kentucky#62 · 1 in 303
- South Dakota#84 · 1 in 277
Best ever in a state: #15 in West Virginia, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #32 | 31 | 1 in 164 |
| Arkansas | #50 | 41 | 1 in 258 |
| Alabama | #53 | 62 | 1 in 295 |
| Kentucky | #62 | 57 | 1 in 303 |
| South Dakota | #84 | 11 | 1 in 277 |
| Mississippi | #86 | 25 | 1 in 356 |
| Missouri | #90 | 61 | 1 in 398 |
| Indiana | #96 | 65 | 1 in 429 |
| Tennessee | #104 | 69 | 1 in 465 |
| Ohio | #116 | 90 | 1 in 525 |
| North Carolina | #118 | 84 | 1 in 553 |
| Nebraska | #120 | 18 | 1 in 394 |
| Iowa | #126 | 25 | 1 in 471 |
| Maine | #131 | 8 | 1 in 389 |
| Kansas | #136 | 23 | 1 in 513 |
| Oklahoma | #138 | 27 | 1 in 547 |
| Delaware | #140 | 6 | 1 in 376 |
| Virginia | #141 | 54 | 1 in 625 |
| Idaho | #142 | 14 | 1 in 512 |
| Michigan | #143 | 58 | 1 in 616 |
| Louisiana | #147 | 28 | 1 in 585 |
| Georgia | #154 | 64 | 1 in 706 |
| South Carolina | #163 | 29 | 1 in 631 |
| Pennsylvania | #179 | 62 | 1 in 753 |
| Oregon | #199 | 18 | 1 in 725 |
| New Hampshire | #205 | 6 | 1 in 633 |
| Texas | #215 | 158 | 1 in 1,016 |
| Washington | #226 | 32 | 1 in 902 |
| Connecticut | #248 | 13 | 1 in 885 |
| New Mexico | #249 | 6 | 1 in 779 |
| Florida | #263 | 72 | 1 in 1,205 |
| Colorado | #264 | 24 | 1 in 972 |
| Illinois | #268 | 39 | 1 in 1,137 |
| Arizona | #282 | 25 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Minnesota | #285 | 19 | 1 in 1,130 |
| Wisconsin | #296 | 18 | 1 in 1,125 |
| Maryland | #304 | 17 | 1 in 1,176 |
| New York | #367 | 46 | 1 in 1,703 |
| New Jersey | #372 | 21 | 1 in 1,690 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Massachusetts | #481 | 11 | 1 in 2,185 |
| California | #592 | 54 | 1 in 2,995 |
| Utah | #704 | 5 | 1 in 3,415 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Everleigh
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 100 spots since 2020 (#94 → #194)
- 415 spots since 2015 (#609 → #194)
- Biggest jump: 539 spots in 2013
- Biggest drop: 49 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · girls
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 2008
- Peaked 2020 at #94 (2,827 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 2020–2022
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 2013–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 572
- Highest: 1 in 572 girls born in 2020 were named Everleigh (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 995 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 65.2% of all girls named Everleigh (13,651) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69 | #2,940 (2009) | #6,874 |
| 2010s | 7,204 | #108 (2019) | #763 |
| 2020s | 13,651 | #94 (2020) | #133 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Everleigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: