Ewell
Last seen for girls in 1919 at #3,817 · Last seen for boys in 1982 at #5,619
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1903 · 12 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,051since 1882
Ewell over time
Rank among boys' names. Ewell has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #5,619 | 6 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #3,357 | 12 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #4,164 | 8 | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | #4,190 | 7 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,445 | 9 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,986 | 5 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,836 | 7 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,415 | 13 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,107 | 8 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,139 | 14 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,986 | 8 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,084 | 15 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,282 | 7 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,115 | 15 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,900 | 9 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,121 | 15 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,759 | 21 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,370 | 12 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,190 | 14 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,821 | 19 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,725 | 20 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,956 | 16 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,958 | 16 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,804 | 18 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,462 | 26 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,746 | 18 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,583 | 22 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,400 | 27 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,519 | 24 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,557 | 21 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,378 | 23 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,574 | 19 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,280 | 29 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,537 | 21 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,633 | 18 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,208 | 31 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,359 | 24 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,095 | 35 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,481 | 21 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,095 | 35 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,247 | 29 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,077 | 37 | |
| 1933 | — | #961 | 43 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,035 | 41 | |
| 1931 | — | #939 | 48 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,190 | 35 | |
| 1929 | — | #995 | 46 | |
| 1928 | — | #938 | 52 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,012 | 48 | |
| 1926 | — | #831 | 63 | |
| 1925 | — | #945 | 51 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,045 | 46 | |
| 1923 | — | #882 | 59 | |
| 1922 | — | #977 | 52 | |
| 1921 | — | #939 | 56 | |
| 1920 | — | #987 | 48 | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #766 | 71 |
| 1918 | — | #824 | 63 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,017 | 41 | |
| 1916 | — | #952 | 45 | |
| 1915 | — | #916 | 46 | |
| 1914 | — | #898 | 37 | |
| 1913 | — | #914 | 29 | |
| 1912 | — | #816 | 29 | |
| 1911 | — | #824 | 16 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,118 | 9 | |
| 1909 | — | #756 | 14 | |
| 1908 | — | #946 | 9 | |
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | #674 | 13 | |
| 1905 | — | #919 | 8 | |
| 1904 | — | #874 | 8 | |
| 1903 | — | #656 | 12 | |
| 1902 | — | #794 | 9 | |
| 1901 | — | #858 | 7 | |
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | #714 | 9 | |
| 1898 | — | #1,002 | 6 | |
| 1897 | — | #787 | 8 | |
| 1896 | — | #1,101 | 5 | |
| 1895 | — | #872 | 7 | |
| 1894 | — | #1,074 | 5 | |
| 1893 | — | #1,035 | 5 | |
| 1892 | — | #861 | 7 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | #884 | 6 | |
| 1889 | — | #789 | 7 | |
| 1888 | — | #1,031 | 5 | |
| 1887 | — | #819 | 6 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | #936 | 5 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Ewell! It came in at #943, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1886, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Ewell is popular in 1934
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#438 · 1 in 5,303
- Texas#775 · 1 in 9,710
Best ever in a state: #194 in Arkansas, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #438 | 5 | 1 in 5,303 |
| Texas | #775 | 6 | 1 in 9,710 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ewell
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1982
- Biggest jump: 314 spots in 1897 (#1,101 → #787)
- Biggest drop: 362 spots in 1910 (#756 → #1,118)
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1903 at #656 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 69 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 38 yrs · run 1899–1909
- Highest: 1 in 9,936 boys born in 1903 were named Ewell (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 302,408 boys born in 1982 (0.00%)
- 25.4% of all boys named Ewell (521) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 35 | #720 (1883) | #873 |
| 1890s | 58 | #714 (1899) | #926 |
| 1900s | 99 | #656 (1903) | #826 |
| 1910s | 386 | #766 (1919) | #905 |
| 1920s | 521 | #831 (1926) | #955 |
| 1930s | 348 | #939 (1931) | #1,148 |
| 1940s | 235 | #1,208 (1940) | #1,467 |
| 1950s | 180 | #1,462 (1951) | #1,879 |
| 1960s | 114 | #2,084 (1965) | #2,582 |
| 1970s | 60 | #3,357 (1979) | #4,191 |
| 1980s | 15 | #4,153 (1981) | #4,886 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ewell in 1934
Top boys' names in 1934
More about 1934
boys
1,032,596 boys got a published name in 1934; 1 in 27,908 of them was named Ewell, which outranked 74.4% of the 4,205 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,059Reece38
- #1,059Thurston38
- #1,059Wayman38
- #1,077Ewell37
- #1,077Courtney37
- #1,077Curley37
- #1,077Davie37
- #1,092Alice36
- #1,092Alois36
- #1,092Arland36
Tied with 14 names at #1,077; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.