Faye

#514 for girls in 2025, 579 births · Last seen for boys in 1964 at #3,601
Given to girls 99.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1934 · 1,420 births
Debut · girls
8 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
72,142
since 1880

Faye over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Faye has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202015peak #146, 1934girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#514579—
2024#539563—
2023#500612—
2022#564537—
2021#603496—
2020#687414—
2019#694416—
2018#700415—
2017#709405—
2016#822349—
2015#930292—
2014#911297—
2013#1,008247—
2012#1,069234—
2011#1,469152—
2010#1,414162—
2009#1,629137—
2008#1,620140—
2007#1,770121—
2006#1,833111—
2005#1,533134—
2004#1,734111—
2003#2,12582—
2002#1,771102—
2001#1,99585—
2000#1,99883—
1999#2,36862—
1998#2,49855—
1997#2,32857—
1996#2,55849—
1995#2,68745—
1994#2,25558—
1993#2,26757—
1992#1,71387—
1991#1,89474—
1990#1,89274—
1989#1,70180—
1988#1,89165—
1987#1,44690—
1986#1,249109—
1985#1,249109—
1984#1,126122—
1983#1,30393—
1982#1,107127—
1981#1,017142—
1980#1,125121—
1979#905164—
1978#919154—
1977#952145—
1976#992128—
1975#917141—
1974#871149—
1973#958125—
1972#848153—
1971#750195—
1970#729204—
1969#653234—
1968#614245—
1967#602248—
1966#573270—
1965#519338—
1964#464437#3,6016
1963#445477—
1962#414556—
1961#377657—
1960#337782—
1959#341772#3,9885
1958#311856#3,0338
1957#298941#3,2577
1956#279974#2,7989
1955#2621,029—
1954#2451,097#2,9428
1953#2531,029#3,7985
1952#2261,221#3,0957
1951#2191,237#2,8448
1950#2101,271#2,7708
1949#2071,292—
1948#2001,345#2,7888
1947#1931,383#2,35611
1946#1821,422—
1945#1691,376#2,5748
1944#1651,353#3,4305
1943#1631,468#2,40510
1942#1751,304#2,38610
1941#1601,377#3,5055
1940#1531,391#1,68017
1939#1611,328#2,6098
1938#1621,323#1,97613
1937#1601,300#2,4799
1936#1621,215#2,18411
1935#1611,257#3,2526
1934#1461,420#2,7428
1933#1531,202#1,90514
1932#1591,223#1,65119
1931#1581,188#2,47110
1930#1771,099#2,17813
1929#1821,080#2,9808
1928#1921,078#3,0768
1927#1871,093#2,03416
1926#1731,219#2,18614
1925#2011,011#2,75510
1924#212920#2,04316
1923#203984#2,22414
1922#210924#2,34713
1921#202989#2,26514
1920#208935#2,23114
1919#202925#2,06315
1918#206932#1,99816
1917#197931#2,09114
1916#204865#1,84916
1915#209790#1,55320
1914#198663#2,6517
1913#194561#1,49713
1912#207459#1,8858
1911#183388#1,5376
1910#208312—
1909#217261#1,4405
1908#184311—
1907#194268—
1906#199239—
1905#227189—
1904#205214—
1903#219190#1,1305
1902#220183#1,1375
1901#226161#1,0585
1900#229194—
1899#251125—
1898#238153—
1897#225148—
1896#240132—
1895#259118—
1894#245121—
1893#256107—
1892#26997—
1891#29870—
1890#32959—
1889#33455—
1888#32056—
1887#32842—
1886#35636—
1885#37330—
1884#41623—
1883#51714—
1882#40720—
1881#49112—
1880#6288—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Faye was already there! It came in at #628, and was given to 8 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 13 girls a year got the name.

Where Faye is popular in 2015

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedNHWashington: #518 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,411 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #444 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,039 girlsMNIllinois: #635 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 3,252 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedMINew York: #1,015 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 6,088 girlsNYMassachusetts: #417 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,945 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedRIOregon: #293 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,171 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedIAIndiana: #854 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,375 girlsINOhio: #893 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,278 girlsOHPennsylvania: #713 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 3,771 girlsPANew Jersey: #856 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,645 girlsNJConnecticut: #501 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,406 girlsCTCalifornia: #776 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 4,464 girlsCAUtah: #424 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,781 girlsUTColorado: #767 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,899 girlsCONebraska: #411 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,603 girlsNEMissouri: #675 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,400 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedKSArkansas: #574 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,364 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Faye, so not publishedHITexas: #1,230 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 8,080 girlsTXFlorida: #1,642 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 12,281 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Oregon#293 · 1 in 1,171
  2. Nebraska#411 · 1 in 1,603
  3. Massachusetts#417 · 1 in 1,945
  4. Utah#424 · 1 in 1,781
  5. Minnesota#444 · 1 in 2,039

Best ever in a state: #35 in Utah, 1914.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Oregon#293131 in 1,171
Nebraska#41151 in 1,603
Massachusetts#417131 in 1,945
Utah#424101 in 1,781
Minnesota#444121 in 2,039
Connecticut#50151 in 2,406
Washington#518131 in 2,411
Arkansas#57451 in 2,364
Illinois#635181 in 3,252
Missouri#67581 in 3,400
Pennsylvania#713141 in 3,771
Colorado#76761 in 3,899
California#776461 in 4,464
Indiana#85471 in 4,375
New Jersey#85681 in 4,645
Ohio#893101 in 5,278
New York#1,015151 in 6,088
Texas#1,230211 in 8,080
Florida#1,64271 in 12,281
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Faye
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 25 spots since 2024 (#539 → #514)
  • 173 spots since 2020 (#687 → #514)
  • 416 spots since 2015 (#930 → #514)
  • Biggest jump: 137 spots in 1881 (#628 → #491)
  • Biggest drop: 220 spots in 1980 (#905 → #1,125)
Rise & fade · girls
54 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1934 at #146 (1,420 births)
  • Births halved by 1961, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 112 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 112 yrs · run 1880–1979
Share of babies · girls
1 in 735
  • Highest: 1 in 735 girls born in 1934 were named Faye (0.14%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,776 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 19.0% of all girls named Faye (13,711) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s296#320 (1888)#417
1890s1,130#225 (1897)#261
1900s2,210#184 (1908)#212
1910s6,826#183 (1911)#201
1920s10,233#173 (1926)#197
1930s12,555#146 (1934)#160
1940s13,711#153 (1940)#177
1950s10,427#210 (1950)#264
1960s4,244#337 (1960)#500
1970s1,558#729 (1970)#884
1980s1,058#1,017 (1981)#1,321
1990s618#1,713 (1992)#2,246
2000s1,106#1,533 (2005)#1,801
2010s2,969#694 (2019)#973
2020s3,201#500 (2023)#568

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Faye in 2015

girls
#930
292 births · 1 in 6,113 girls

Top girls' names in 2015

  1. #1Emma20,487
  2. #2Olivia19,729
  3. #3Sophia17,454
  4. #4Ava16,416
  5. #5Isabella15,667
  6. #6Mia14,943
  7. #7Abigail12,422
  8. #8Emily11,808
  9. #9Charlotte11,415
  10. #10Harper10,311
  11. #930Faye292
More about 2015

girls

1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 6,113 of them was named Faye, which outranked 95.1% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Faye
  1. #927Belen296
  2. #928Aliya293
  3. #928Judith293
  4. #930Faye292
  5. #930Saniyah292
  6. #930Yasmin292
  7. #933Aranza290
  8. #933Dixie290
  9. #933Jaylin290

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,984Alaia#2,648 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,835Meilani#2,781 → #946
  3. ↑ 1,733Aitana#2,648 → #915
  4. ↑ 1,387Aislinn#2,351 → #964
  5. ↑ 1,072Taya#2,049 → #977
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,075Isis#703 → #1,778
  2. ↓ 502Annabell#923 → #1,425
  3. ↓ 500Anabel#911 → #1,411
  4. ↓ 344Cindy#711 → #1,055
  5. ↓ 334Anabella#529 → #863

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2015 →